|
1916 Sporting News Joe Jackson PSA 7
Posted By: <b>Steve Rector</b><p>I was going to bid on this card on an eBay auction ending on the February 8th, but I would like to get peoples' opinions on whether or not to bid on it.<BR><BR>Thanks<BR>Steve<BR><BR><BR><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1076164814.JPG">
|
1916 Sporting News Joe Jackson PSA 7
Posted By: <b>Mike Williams</b><p>I think it's a generous 7 based solely on the corner wear. JMO...come on spring!<BR><BR>Mike
|
1916 Sporting News Joe Jackson PSA 7
Posted By: <b>Julie Vognar</b><p>The corners are about EX, and there appears to be some surface wear (but that may just be the scan).<BR><BR>More learned oppinions than mine?<BR><BR>
|
1916 Sporting News Joe Jackson PSA 7
Posted By: <b>slacks</b><p>Ditto.
|
1916 Sporting News Joe Jackson PSA 7
Posted By: <b>Julie Vognar</b><p>...but you don't need the extra expense of bidding on a lower conditioned card in a PSA 7 holder.<BR><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1076166965.JPG"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1076167014.JPG"><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>(T his particular Standard Biscuit set shares a checklist and photos with the Sporting News series of 1916.) What's the back on yours (the one you're thinking of bidding on?)
|
1916 Sporting News Joe Jackson PSA 7
Posted By: <b>Steve</b><p>The back of the card says the Sporting News. <BR><BR>Thanks
|
1916 Sporting News Joe Jackson PSA 7
Posted By: <b>quan</b><p>wasn't ur jax an sgc50 from TIK? I could be mistaken.
|
1916 Sporting News Joe Jackson PSA 7
Posted By: <b>Julie</b><p>I was going to say, "What's the dfifference--SGC 50 or PSA 4?" But then, there's the difference between SGC and PSA. Let's not open THAT can of worms in this thread!<BR>It wasn't till I scanned the card this morning that I finally saw what's wrong with his nose (I knew there was SOMETHING),
|
1916 Sporting News Joe Jackson PSA 7
Posted By: <b>jay behrens</b><p>Card looks good other than the fact that it's overgraded. There is a sharp corner on that card. No way a card like that should have NM anywhere in its grade. A nice strong EX. No better, maybe worse depending on hidding defects.<BR><BR>Jay
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 PM. |