Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Grover Cleveland Alexander Rookies (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=151396)

bcbgcbrcb 05-20-2012 06:05 AM

Grover Cleveland Alexander Rookies
 
I would like to get a concensus of opinion on what everyone thinks Grover Cleveland Alexander's Rookie (notice I did not say Rookie Card) should be amongst the above four options

HRBAKER 05-20-2012 07:01 AM

A concensus may be tough here Phil.
Good luck!

FrankWakefield 05-20-2012 07:30 AM

I voted for the Supplement. I understand how that's not a traditional card, nor are the silks and leathers. But it sure seems to me that the 1913 card is a card; whatever distinguishes it from the Cracker Jack eludes me...

yanksfan09 05-20-2012 01:55 PM

I agree a game card is still that, a card. I'm not voting because I'm torn between the supplement or the game card. I can see the argument against the supplement and silks as they are not really cards but the game card is card, imo.

That being said I'd still rather have a cracker jack or fatima, but that doesn't make it his rookie. Sort of like the 1952 Mantle. It may be his best and most sought after card, but that doesn't make it a rookie.

FrankWakefield 05-20-2012 03:31 PM

http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j1...913NatGame.jpg
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j1...atGameback.jpg


Got this one years and years ago from Mr. Lipset.

Bicem 05-20-2012 03:59 PM

rookie what if not card?

Bosox Blair 05-20-2012 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrankWakefield (Post 995429)

Was that from Lew's brother, Chew Lipset? :D

FrankWakefield 05-20-2012 06:36 PM

How good of shape is your 1913 Alexander in?

mcap100176 05-20-2012 06:52 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here's my Alexander. It is one of my favorite cards.

Bosox Blair 05-20-2012 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrankWakefield (Post 995479)
How good of shape is your 1913 Alexander in?

Ummmm...just a little joke there, Frank. But since you asked, a fair bit nicer than yours. Why? It isn't a particularly rare or valuable card...a few hundred in Near Mint. Undervalued IMO.

And to the point of the thread - I already voted 1913 as RC. Don't see why CJ would be when there was a card a year before.

Cheers,
Blair

FrankWakefield 05-20-2012 09:52 PM

I agree it isn't the best. When I first held it I was reminded of what a piece of paper was like after a car tire rolled over it on rough concrete. Post your near mint one, so I can praise it's pristine state... I once heard someone say "don't blahh someone else's bling"... My red border Old Mill of Stengel wasn't the nicest out there. A few folks could post nicer ones. The Cleveland Fatima T200 premium I had was a bit worse for wear, but there weren't many folks that had one better. You just posted when I was a bit sensitive about blahhing. Sorry.

Bosox Blair 05-20-2012 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrankWakefield (Post 995557)
I agree it isn't the best. When I first held it I was reminded of what a piece of paper was like after a car tire rolled over it on rough concrete. Post your near mint one, so I can praise it's pristine state... I once heard someone say "don't blahh someone else's bling"... My red border Old Mill of Stengel wasn't the nicest out there. A few folks could post nicer ones. The Cleveland Fatima T200 premium I had was a bit worse for wear, but there weren't many folks that had one better. You just posted when I was a bit sensitive about blahhing. Sorry.

Hi Frank,

I apologize to you - I did not mean any disrespect or to hit any sensitive spot. I don't regard card collecting as competitive. I generally like to encourage my fellow collectors. That is partly why I avoid posting in the monthly pickup threads - sometimes (not always) I feel they take on a competitive vibe.

I was joking because I sometimes think I'm funny...others differ on that :p. All the best to you and my other brothers in collecting.

Cheers,
Blair

slidekellyslide 05-20-2012 10:37 PM

I'm still holding out hope of finding a small town Nebraska baseball team postcard with GCA on it...I know one has to exist. Two Dazzy Vance Superior cards have surfaced in the last year.

bcbgcbrcb 05-25-2012 04:24 PM

Looks like the concensus here is the M101-2 as the true Rookie for GCA. I'm kind of surprised that the "card" definition collectors opted more for the 1914 cards than the 1913 cards which were obviously all standard-size traditional cards. I guess the mainstream, nationally distributed thing came into play there.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 PM.