Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   2011 Topps Update Diamond Anniversary Mike Trout PSA 10 AUTO 10 (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=274633)

mlbgamejerseys 10-12-2019 02:01 PM
2011 Topps Update Diamond Anniversary Mike Trout PSA 10 AUTO 10
 
The base update PSA 10/10 has been selling for 4-5k. So is this one worth 16-20k+?

I checked PSA and there are only 6 with this grade, compared to 33 for the base version.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2011-Topps-...c&LH_Auction=1

Hxcmilkshake 10-12-2019 03:13 PM
IP auto?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

swarmee 10-12-2019 04:06 PM
Yes, these didn't come autographed. That's why there is no clouded section for the auto, no Topps Certified stamp, and it's PSA/DNA certified.

mlbgamejerseys 10-12-2019 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by swarmee (Post 1923122)
Yes, these didn't come autographed. That's why there is no clouded section for the auto, no Topps Certified stamp, and it's PSA/DNA certified.
Also, has the MLB certified hologram on the back of the card.

swarmee 10-12-2019 06:11 PM
Then I'm not a fan of it getting a PSA 10. Card has been altered with a sticker Topps didn't put on. May be covering up damage/scratch.

mlbgamejerseys 10-12-2019 06:25 PM
I'll take a shot at it, if it stays cheap. :D

steve B 10-12-2019 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by swarmee (Post 1923151)
Then I'm not a fan of it getting a PSA 10. Card has been altered with a sticker Topps didn't put on. May be covering up damage/scratch.
Being non- factory shouldn't it be a 9MK? (Assuming they don't do qualifiers on 10s)

Peter_Spaeth 10-12-2019 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B (Post 1923165)
Being non- factory shouldn't it be a 9MK? (Assuming they don't do qualifiers on 10s)
No, they grade unofficially autographed cards like this now. It looks a tad short to me though.

swarmee 10-12-2019 08:23 PM
A certified auto isn't considered a Mark. A piece of paper glued to a card should be treated as making the card Authentic; it's just like if you submitted a card still affixed to a scrapbook page.

steve B 10-13-2019 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923167)
No, they grade unofficially autographed cards like this now. It looks a tad short to me though.
So by that logic a nice card with a fake autograph could still grade a 10....
Writing is writing no matter who does it.

swarmee 10-13-2019 01:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B (Post 1923307)
So by that logic a nice card with a fake autograph could still grade a 10....
Writing is writing no matter who does it.
Not true. A fake auto would be either ungradeable or a MK. Probably ungradeable. A card signed by the player has a special exemption status instead of a qualifier.

Exhibitman 10-14-2019 08:29 AM
PSA is Humpty Dumpty: it is what it is until PSA says otherwise.

Gary Dunaier 10-19-2019 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by swarmee (Post 1923151)
Card has been altered with a sticker Topps didn't put on.
In this case it's not just "a sticker" but an official MLB Authentication hologram. Does that have any bearing on it?

The MLB Authentication Database for this hologram number describes the item as:
Item: Autographed Baseball Card
Hologram number JC128132
Event: MLAM Signing - Mike Trout
Date: May 02, 2019
Autographer: Mike Trout
Additional Information: Inscribed Millville Meteor

swarmee 10-20-2019 04:43 AM
Not to me. Again, the sticker could be covering up a flaw. To give the card a 10 grade with an aftermarket sticker applied isn't something I agree with.

Republicaninmass 10-20-2019 08:03 AM
Lofty predictions. I wonder how long until its relisted from The Vault?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:30 PM.