Bump
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
I don't know modern Mantles or Williams', but the 'B' in Ruth is horrible and the Gehrigs are also horrible. I have never understood why anyone bought either of these forgeries. The shellacked balls are equally horrible. |
Quote:
Forgery of sports memorabilia is one of the more difficult criminal cases to prosecute, because autographs can never be authenticated with 100% certainty. Everything is an opinion. Yet, criminal cases are subject to the highest evidentiary burden. It has to be "beyond a reasonable doubt." Being 99% sure someone forged autographs isn't good enough. These cases drain a lot of resources because of this. |
Beyond Reasonable Doubt Percent
Quote:
I don't know about that but maybe a board lawyer will know. According to Google 98%-99% is good.... . Whereas, in a civil trial, a party may prevail with as little as 51 percent probability (a preponderance), those legal authorities who venture to assign a numerical value to “beyond a reasonable doubt” place it in the certainty range of 98 or 99 percent. . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
(Of course there are sh*tloads of uneducated walking around,) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
- a former, private criminal defense attorney |
I was discussing the green 27 Yankees forged ball with my gf and she was confused as to why anyone would buy something like that, given the expert resources on this forum.
The people who buy that stuff don't come here. The letters are enough for them. |
Quote:
|
Great video...I remember exchanging emails and eventually purchasing some authentic items from the undercover agent in this case (John Ferreira) after he retired and opened his own shop up in Oregon.
I decided to look him up after watching the video as it's been several years since we last spoke and was saddened to learn he passed away in February. I wanted to pass this along in case anyone else spoke or bought from John. He was a great man and did a ton for the hobby. http://www.nmplimited.com/obituaries...A?obId=2978288 |
Quote:
It's worthy to side note that science is excellent at forgery detection, but has limits in authentication. For example, if the canvas and paint is scientifically shown to be from the 1900s, that in and of itself proves the Rembrandt painting is a fake. However, if the canvas and paint are shown to be from the correct period, that is important if not essential evidence but not proof in and of itself that the painting was by Rembrandt. |
I think what you are saying is, it's easier to prove something is not real than it is to prove something is real.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
I was collecting McGwire for several years before Operation Bullpen started. I managed to get "hired" by several auction houses after the story broke to check out their McGwire signatures. What amazed me in the video is that while he was pretty good at forging a lot of different players, his McGwire was so bad I thought anyone could see it!
|
1 Attachment(s)
My favorite autograph in my collection.
A copy of the book Operation Bullpen signed by Tim Fitzsimmons. Attachment 326947 |
Quote:
Very nice my friend, very nice. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:28 AM. |