What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>NetJr</b><p>Is there is a number marked out or is there a variation like this?<br /><br /><img src="http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r260/netjr/KeelerBatPSA2.jpg">

What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>jay behrens</b><p>Do you own the card? Being able to examine the card up close will be able to tell you a lot.<br /><br />Jay<br><br>I love pinatas. You get to beat the crap of something and get rewarded with candy.

What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>Judge Dred (Fred)</b><p>Can you scan the back at 400 dpi and then crop out the area in question. You'll be able to see so much more by creating a hi-res scan.

What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>MVSNYC</b><p>obviosuly there is paper-loss right where the "1" should be...i have never heard of a "50" series variation...

What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>tbarlage</b><p>Wow, this is actually a card I am selling in a small HOF lot now. Had to run and get the card for closer inspection but unfortunately I think the 1 is just missing as I believe it is a regular 150 series. While the back does not appear to be damaged it is a little rough in that area, just not quite smooth enough to believe it is a genuine printing error either. Not a bad PSA 2 though.

What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>steve f</b><p>with the crease and stain I would guess PSA missed the back issue (I did). Very nice Keeler though... Welcome back Jay!

What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>NetJr</b><p>Yes I pulled it off ebay as I liked the lot and was trying to figure it out.

What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>MVSNYC</b><p>...all's well that ends well. <br /><br />...wait, i think i just found a "60" series broad leaf, oh no, sorry, just some paper-loss. <img src="/images/wink.gif" height=14 width=14>

What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>Frank Wakefield</b><p>From the scan you've provided, it appears that a slight abrasion to the back has removed the first didgit of "150". It would be a card with slight back damage, not a rarity.

What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>Eric B</b><p>Wow. You can hardly tell. Amazing if it was by accident. If not, imagine what you could do with pencil marks <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

What is wrong with the back of this card?
 

Posted By: <b>andy becker</b><p>i am 99.9% certain that i used to own that card. paper loss were the "1" in 150 is.