Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Change Of Subject: A New Challange: (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=209475)

clydepepper 08-02-2015 05:58 PM

Change Of Subject: A New Challange:
 
What is the lowest certification number of a graded card you own?

In other words, we are trying to find the card that was graded first
Chronologically speaking.
.
.
Show your Old Certification Scans!
.
.

Peter_Spaeth 08-02-2015 06:06 PM

PSA old labels starting with 0 are probably the oldest but they weren't in order, I think they did 0400s before 0200s if memory serves.

bnorth 08-02-2015 06:10 PM

Removed because of rule changes.:(

pokerplyr80 08-02-2015 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bnorth (Post 1437371)
I have these Beckett graded cards. These are the 5th and 7th cards ever graded by Beckett in testing before any where ever graded for the public.

You may have just abruptly ended this challenge. I'm sure #005 is going to be hard to beat.

clydepepper 08-02-2015 07:56 PM

I meant to specify PSA or SGC graded only since they have been doing it long enough not to have 'bogus' JoeBob's Grahdin' or even Dr. James (what, me an egomaniac?) Beckett entries.

I guess legit (MLB Players) cards graded by Beckett should be considered, since I think they have graded as long or close to as long as SGC.

Obviously, the Gretzsky Wagner card has the lowest number since it was the first PSA ever graded. but I wonder who was the first SGC graded card or who, among us, has the closest PSA number to that Wagner.
.
.

clydepepper 08-02-2015 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1437366)
PSA old labels starting with 0 are probably the oldest but they weren't in order, I think they did 0400s before 0200s if memory serves.

Peter - What a Buzz-Kill you are. While I do not in any way question your knowledge on this subject...you are still a buzz-kill.

Okay---well, let's still go with the lowest number quest just to see how it turns out. Okay, Peter?
.
.

Peter_Spaeth 08-02-2015 08:03 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Raymond here is my lowest serial number but it isn't even a first generation grade.

clydepepper 08-02-2015 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1437438)
Raymond here is my lowest serial number but it isn't even a first generation grade.

That okay - What a GREAT Card!!!
.
.

Jay Wolt 08-02-2015 08:15 PM

Here's a couple of PSA's I had graded when this card issue came out, they beat the '49 Paige
& will be happy to trade these 2 for that one ;)

http://www.qualitycards.com/pictures/01171623.jpg

clydepepper 08-02-2015 08:28 PM

Here's My Lowest (leader in the clubhouse)
 
1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 199270

Kenny Cole 08-02-2015 10:01 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I think this is my earliest PSA flip

ErikV 08-03-2015 12:45 AM

Re: Change Of Subject: A New Challange:
 
2 Attachment(s)
This a my lowest numbered PSA cards. The Bresnahan I no longer own, but it appears to have
an early PSA label and a somewhat low serial number.

ErikV


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.