Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Ruth Ebay (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=261504)

Shoeless Moe 10-30-2018 01:21 PM

Ruth Ebay
 
1 Attachment(s)
Any thought to whether this was good or not?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-1914-D....m43663.l10137

Only 1 Ebayer took a chance but a veteran one (higher feedback rating) at that.

Bpm0014 10-30-2018 01:29 PM

Zero chance that is real unfortunately.

SetBuilder 10-30-2018 01:41 PM

What a waste of $400 (the catalog is scarce and is probably worth $100 or so).

Dpoolem3 10-31-2018 12:05 PM

I noticed it was in pencil

forgers use pencils to create fake autographs on old paper because if you use ink the paper absorbs the ink differently than it would when it was new giving away tell tale signs it is a fake...pre-ball point pen by the masses


I have a Gehrig I bought in the mid 90's that is in pencil on a pic of him taken out of a Who's Who of Baseball...it looks great but I have my doubts of it being legit(who carries around a page from a book to get signed at a barnstorming game????)

SetBuilder 10-31-2018 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dpoolem3 (Post 1823609)

forgers use pencils to create fake autographs on old paper because if you use ink the paper absorbs the ink differently than it would when it was new giving away tell tale signs it is a fake...pre-ball point pen by the masses


People repeat this like it's a concrete rule and it's not. It's very misleading.

Old paper doesn't always feather. New paper doesn't always not feather. It depends on the condition of the paper's surface coating, the viscosity of the ink, and if the ink is water based, alcohol based, oil based, etc.

thetruthisoutthere 10-31-2018 06:23 PM

Forged Babe Ruth Sold By Ebay Seller Dalebooks
 
1 Attachment(s)
What a waste of $499.99!!!!

Selling forgeries on Ebay is actually easier than selling authentic autographs.

Look at this crap.



Attachment 332837

w7imel 10-31-2018 06:44 PM

looks like a kid was just practicing his autograph...I would have hated to pay 400 and than find out its garbage...I guess on bright side it was only 400 bucks.:(:(

Shoeless Moe 10-31-2018 09:51 PM

That's 2 people now in this thread that have said it was "$400".

$499 is not $400, its $500.

khkco4bls 11-01-2018 11:28 AM

0H, 500 then it was well worth it....

Stampsfan 11-01-2018 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe (Post 1823750)
That's 2 people now in this thread that have said it was "$400".

$499 is not $400, its $500.

This is the same logic my wife uses when buying something.

David Atkatz 11-01-2018 12:59 PM

The point was, if you read the OP. that the catalog itself is worth $100, so the "winner" is really only down $400.

Shoeless Moe 11-01-2018 05:04 PM

Ah!

That's why this board needs a Professor, such as yourself.


My math is at the Larry Fine level.

Leon 11-06-2018 06:34 AM

Yuck. I could sign Ruth's signature better than that!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe (Post 1823407)
Any thought to whether this was good or not?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-1914-D....m43663.l10137

Only 1 Ebayer took a chance but a veteran one (higher feedback rating) at that.


frankbmd 11-06-2018 07:36 AM

Collins appears to be an eye witness of the autograph.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 PM.