Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   E90-1, The Kraken (AKA The E-Monster) - post your collection progress (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=247839)

Paul S 12-01-2017 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frankbmd (Post 1725166)
Brian,

You may consider the condition of the Cobb irrelevant, but I have never cared for an abdominal gunshot wound victim, who would agree with you.;)

My gut reaction: I miss that Cobb - but it couldn't be in better hands.:)

brianp-beme 12-01-2017 10:47 AM

Buckshot all around
 
1 Attachment(s)
All true, but what Paul fails to mention is that Cobb is the true hero in this story...he took the blunt of the attack for his fellow E90-1 ballplayers, but there was still some collateral damage.

Brian

familytoad 12-02-2017 01:34 AM

The modern abacus
 
Hmm...I build a spreadsheet to tabulate all of our Kraken numbers but something isn’t adding up.

I have 89 cards that are 1 pointers
I have 32 cards that are toughies, as listed in post #1

But my excel sheet only makes these add to 244, not the coveted 250.
I looked twice , maybe three times but it’s after midnight here...anyone care to check the math again?

To that point, I might have missed something but I have this electronic abacus file available to share so you can easily calculate your own Kraken number, just by clicking either “have” or “need”. There’s even a pie chart and some math formulae to help determine how close you are to the set, and the percentage of common (one pointers) versus “toughies”.

Let me know if you’d like the sheet... of course it needs to be fine tuned since my dreary eyes only see 244 points!

tonyo 12-02-2017 07:05 AM

Brian,
I agree with your math

brianp-beme 12-02-2017 10:44 AM

The concrete has been jackhammered and a new layer applied
 
Ouch. Tony and Brian (not me) are correct. I should stop messing with new math and just figure out things the old fashioned way, utilizing a series of fingers and toes. I checked my abacus and some of the little discs have chunks missing from them, which I assume affects performance as well.

Dammit I didn't want to make another change, but my poor mathematics and that mystical 250 Kraken # requires it. There are three cards that were on the bubble to be elevated from 1 point status to 3 point status. If I had added up correctly before they would have been included. They are:

Bemis - now 3 points instead of 1
O'Connor - now 3 points instead of 1
Seigle - now 3 points instead of 1

I regrettably need to revise (and set in concrete, and then put some sort of concrete shellacking material over top, if such a product exists) the point tallies to reflect this. The complete set should come to 250 points (please double-check me!) and anyone who sees their name on the Kraken list with a 'subject to change' needs to re-figure their official set number.

My apologies,

Brian (the less accurate one)

familytoad 12-02-2017 11:51 AM

Kraken Abacus ready to go
 
Brian P,

Thanks for all of your work on this.
It looks like we have finalized the Kraken number and we're ready to go!

So I've created the modern abacus to help track the complicated Kraken Calculation.
It doesn't appear as if I can upload a MS Excel file on to this site, so anyone desiring this spreadsheet can simply email me. A PM with *your* email address will also work.

My email address is my net54 user name at comcast dot net.

The familytoad Kraken number now sits at 110.

I don't have scans handy, but I'll add some of my low grade beauties as time allows.

familytoad 12-02-2017 12:01 PM

Abacus Preview
 
1 Attachment(s)
This is a snip of what the Kraken Abacus looks like. Mine shows 110 of the possible 250 points. 44% of the Kraken.

I have 77 of the 121 cards, or 63.64% of the actual set.
I also have 40% the toughies.
More pie charts will likely come with future versions.

To calculate, its as easy as picking "have" or "need" and the sheet does the work...

tedzan 12-02-2017 12:07 PM

Hi Brian P.

My current set (2nd set) consists of the subjects on display here, and 44 commons. Therefore, if my math is correct, my # is 93.


http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7.../batwagner.jpg . . http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...rfranknagy.jpg

http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7.../E90Upp50x.jpg . . http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...e/duffyupp.jpg

http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...eTinker50x.jpg . . http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...90Plank19x.jpg

http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7.../atrispeak.jpg . http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...e/abkeeler.jpg



http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...ze/e90cobb.jpg




TED Z

T206 Reference
.

brianp-beme 12-02-2017 12:29 PM

Hi Ted, nice tough cards. The total I come up with is 95. Possibly the difference in our totals is that you have shown the Tinker and Chase cards, which are only one point, and thus I have counted them twice (both as part of your 44 commons you mentioned, and since they were scanned for the post). Let us know what the official total is and I will get your Kraken # up there.

Brian

Steve D 12-02-2017 03:24 PM

I just updated my Excel spreadsheet, adding all 121 cards to it (previously, I just had the cards I actually own reflected on it), and including the weighting in Brian's first post. I got a total number of 250 also, so it looks like the numbers are correct.

My number of 93 is also correct.

Steve


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 AM.