weird pop report situation
Just got a very nice r311 Cardinals premium back from SGC and I can't locate the set anywhere on PSA's pop report. Do they not grade these? I'd call them and ask, but I don't want to take anyone away from grading a card :D
|
Hey Scott, I'm about 95% sure they are too large for the PSA holder. For comparison, T3's are about 5.75x8, but the R311s are slightly larger at about 6x8.
DJ |
Thanks DJ, I have the best customers!
|
Since your question seems to be answered, can we open this thread up to other weird-pops (which sounds like the name of an ice cream product on a Wacky Pack sticker from the 70's)?
I was looking at the PSA site for my 1961 high numbers, and at the end of the list there is a strange anomaly. It lists card #603 as the Pirates Team, and there is a single card in the pop. For clarification, the set only goes to #589 and the Pirates card is #554. I know the obvious answer is the card is/was simply a 1971 Topps #603, the Pirates Team, erroneously labeled as 1961 (I guess it's possible, although incredibly unlikely, that something else is in play here, like a wrong back or something). Is that going to be forever left there until someone actually sends the slab in to be corrected, or the owner removes the card and sends the slab back in to PSA?? |
If you collected all the erroneous matter on PSA's site you'd have a full time job. I assume, like 99% of the others, that it is sloppy data entry and not something cool.
|
I have a Dizzy Dean from that set. Mine is SGC graded 3, but I think it looks great in their holder. I'm just fine if PSA doesn't grade them. Now, if only SGC would grade Butterfingers...
|
would love someone to grade blankets too while we're wishing
|
Quote:
Brian |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 AM. |