OT: And Then...................
 

And Then......................

Oh its over already???

Yeah that was good:eek:






Got cards that match this show em'

This flew right over my head...what am I missing here?

The same thing everyone else except Andrew is.

These match:

Those are pretty nice Barry. Bet they are worth a fortune.

Ok
 

What this guy said....

Wow, yes it's Monday, but I don't need any additional help getting lost!!!

Yeah it was that good!!!!!!!!

Ugh.

http://paulstallard.files.wordpress....dhatpieman.jpg

No "and then".

Are these 3 suitable? I like them!

OK...I will play along. Behold my Claude Rains rookie. :D




Best Regards,

Eric

Here is my COMPLETE set of commemorative Chicago Cubs World Series Champion cards from 1909-2012......

Picked this up from a board member.I think it looks better than a 7.What do you guys think?

Heres a scan of the back

Is this a reference to your card slabbing endeavor?

here's my T206 green Cobb with a red Cobb back in a 5.5. hope you guys like it

I don't have a 52 Topps Mantle PSA4 with great centering that looks more like a 5, but Adrian does!

I must have taken an extra Vicodin or three, because three pages in, I still don't know what the heck the original poster is wanting.

That's the point. It's a thread about nothing. Tough day yesterday so it was funny to see who all would post about nothing or play along and be silly with me. This thread could turn into whatever it wants.

H (grinnies not working)

Picked up this real nice '51 Bowman but since it's not pre-war, I won't post it.

bump.

Thread Idea
 

<a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/hljfnnhb13wn9SxZoxoj2IRT3dysq2WPtX5u9gk-z0Y?feat=embedwebsite"><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-v6-hj-upAVo/UTd_d3bpWYI/AAAAAAAAQ7g/kEF7ctBpDzc/s800/Butthead.jpg" height="191" width="341" /></a>

<a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/TP31zEfAZ08BxbhN4fYEl4RT3dysq2WPtX5u9gk-z0Y?feat=embedwebsite"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/--OjGTF3frI0/T_byLtohKFI/AAAAAAAALFc/vNC0b81nXzU/s800/Gollum.jpg" height="384" width="272" /></a>

Parental Guidance for free!
 

This post not authorized by its intended user.

... as always, should any member of this board be caught or killed (or found discussing things outside the realm of pre-war cards), the moderators will disavow all knowledge of your actions. This post will self-destruct in 5 seconds. Good Luck, Jim.......................................

Frank,

I hate to break this to you. Card #125, Jose Canseco, shows evidence of chemical alteration.

Oh, wait.

On second thought, I believe the player is chemically altered...not the card.

My mistake. Carry on.

:D

Best Regards,

Eric

My 1971 Dock Ellis has the same problem if not the same chemicals:D

You know the old players where chemically altered also. BEER!

Strange, but true........
 

If I used my middle name, I would be "Doc" Ellis with no "k".....okay:eek:

But Frank, your daily dabbling in modern chemistry is not EXACTLY what DOCK was enjoying.:D

These pretzels are making me thirsty!!!!!

Has anyone seen my keys?

From the estate of William Lucas, manager of the 1888 Davenport Onion Weeders, would this count as his Old Judge card and then make him the only rep from that team in the set? I think the second one should therefore count as Lucas and Dog, the companion of the Whitney/Dog card

“Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, 'if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.”

Twerk it Miley


:eek: