Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>BcD</b><p><img src="http://www.t207.com/bcd/t206_chase_mcgann.jpg"><br /><br />ok,the Chase looks trimmed-but it came from a book that was 96 years old and never touched until a year ago~ ( you know,attic,basement,old house,gramps,burried in yard ET)<br /><br /><img src="http://www.t207.com/bcd/t206_chase_mcgann_backs.jpg"><br /><br />there is nothing wrong with these!<br /><br /><img src="http://www.t207.com/bcd/t206_jennings_laporte.jpg"><br /><br />see!<br /><img src="http://www.t207.com/bcd/t206_jennings_laporte_backs.jpg"><br /><br />" I love PSA" Dan McKee<br /><br /><br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>Scott T</b><p>I think American Beauty T206's were a bit narrower than the other brands.<br><br>Scott <br />

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>Paul</b><p>I think the American Beauty packs were smaller, so the cards had to be smaller. Can somebody confirm this?

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>As BCD knows, and most other T206 collectors know, the American Beauty packs of stogey's were more narrow than other packs and therefore the cards are more narrow than others....

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>Todd</b><p>but I think Brian's point is that the cards are way too nice for the grade, unless they are trimmed, in which case they should be rejected altogether. Isn't kinda trimmed like kinda pregnant?<br /><br />Edited to add they both look trimmed to me, especially compared to the other 2 AB scans that were included.

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>Richard</b><p>The Jennings has paper loss on the front so I think the grade is accurate on that one. All of them seem to have water staining on the back. Perhaps from soaking? The back of the McGann really shows the staining well. <br /><br />The Chase seems to be low as a 1, but I do think that they are all accurately graded. If any of them, aside from Jennings, was in a 3 holder, I don't think anyone would question it. High end 2, low end 3, not much difference.<br /><br />

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>Brian Weisner</b><p><br /> Hi Guys,<br /> The cards are not trimmed, but I agree with Richard they do look like they came from a scrap book and may have some paper loss not visable on scans. <br /> I would buy all 4 cards in those grades.....<br /><br /> Be well Brian

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>B.C.Daniels</b><p>Richard should start his own grading company....<br /><br />he could call it EGC ( Exacto Grading Co.) or maybe WCG***<br />Wong's Correct Grading<br /><br /><a href="http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?from=R40&satitle=dept+56+wongs" target="_new" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?from=R40&satitle=dept+56+wongs</a" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?from=R40&satitle=dept+56+wongs</a</a>><br /><br />my favorite Wong piece!! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br /><br />The cards are NOT trimmed. I have 20 more from the same group and scrap book. <br />The Chase deserves a 6 holder~<br /><br />

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>warshawlaw</b><p>sorry...

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>joe brennan</b><p>I'm not sure if 2 Wongs make a right. <br />I know 2 wrongs don't make a right.<br />But I know for sure that 3 lefts make a right. <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br><br>A scared man can't gamble and a jealous man can't work.

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>cmoking</b><p>two wongs don't make a white<br /><br />

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>JimB</b><p>cmoking,<br />Thanks for the poignant remark.<br /><br />Aside from the Chase, those grades don't look all that inaccurate to me. As Richard said, maybe, they are off by one, but paper loss will kill a technical grade.<br />JimB

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>Rick</b><p>the cards are fine ...what exactly its the problem?

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>I think Brian posted these as undergraded because he thought the grader was afraid they may have been trimmed, which is not the case. <br /><br />Normally I stay out of these grading threads because I have trouble grading scans instead of cards...and I don't have a corner fettish.

Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA!
 

Posted By: <b>B.C.Daniels</b><p>for not recognizing the origin of King's quote of which I have stated many times to Richard Wong! He would enjoy it more if he saw this movie!<br /><br />The line is....<br />"two Wong's don't make a White" response<br />"and for that joke you shall die the death of a thousand men!"<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061177/" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061177/</a><br /><br /><br /><br />and yes,your assesment is accurate and I understand that without seeing the cards your expertise is free~ (for now!) <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br /><br />