Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   1952 Topps 6th Series - Were They Really Dumped in the Ocean (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=348263)

Zach Wheat 04-10-2024 07:14 AM

1952 Topps 6th Series - Were They Really Dumped in the Ocean
 
The baseball season was well under way and Sy Berger and other Topps execs were debating about whether to issue a 6th and final series in their 1952 baseball Topps set. Sy Berger stated in interviews they debated about issuing the last "set" (Sy called the 6th series a "set") due to timing of the release. The final series of 97 cards came out later than anticipated at the close of the baseball season with many cards not reaching stores until well after the World Series had ended. The 6th series cards did not sell well.

Sy Berger, always the salesman, claimed that Topps was running out of warehouse space and the remaining inventory was dumped in the ocean off of a barge in the 1960's.

Is that really what occurred? Let's hear your thoughts.

jchcollins 04-10-2024 08:56 AM

I’ve always found this story dubious at best.

Berger did not start telling it until decades later when he was an older man, and from what I know - there were no other Topps employees at the time who ever confirmed it.

Realistically, why not just use the dumpster to get rid of the stuff instead of renting out a garbage scowl or whatever and sailing off into the East River?

Don’t get me wrong. It’s a great story. I would love for it to be true. But it doesn’t make a ton of sense. The idea that it’s fiction born when the hobby became popular and Berger and others started getting more requests for comments and interviews makes a lot more sense to me.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Volod 04-10-2024 09:49 AM

SS Topps
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jchcollins (Post 2425675)
I’ve always found this story dubious at best.

Berger did not start telling it until decades later when he was an older man, and from what I know - there were no other Topps employees at the time who ever confirmed it.

Realistically, why not just use the dumpster to get rid of the stuff instead of renting out a garbage scowl or whatever and sailing off into the East River?

Don’t get me wrong. It’s a great story. I would love for it to be true. But it doesn’t make a ton of sense. The idea that it’s fiction born when the hobby became popular and Berger and others started getting more requests for comments and interviews makes a lot more sense to me.

Agree with John's assessment...but, found this old photo somewhere, forget where.;)

G1911 04-10-2024 09:51 AM

It is a tale that can not be fact checked now and nothing in it is impossible, but it was probably a lie as most tightly-constructed stories decades after the fact that don't really make much sense if you think about it are.

ALR-bishop 04-10-2024 09:58 AM

Warehouse expense or expense of giving them away versus hiring trucks, loading trucks, unloading trucks, renting barge, loading barge, hiring crews for trucks, barge, dock workers....and Topps being cheap. Stuff of legends ?

Zach Wheat 04-10-2024 10:33 AM

In one interview Sy indicates Topps rented a garbage scow to dump the cards because they did not want them stolen from the dumpster. However, there were other ways to get rid of them.

I hope Toppcat is able to chime in...as always, his Topps Archives gives some very insightful and interesting details of the story

jchcollins 04-10-2024 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop (Post 2425695)
Warehouse expense or expense of giving them away versus hiring trucks, loading trucks, unloading trucks, renting barge, loading barge, hiring crews for trucks, barge, dock workers....and Topps being cheap. Stuff of legends ?


Supposedly they tried to give them away at fairs and carnivals for years - at least in some version of the story - and when this ultimately never worked, they dumped them in the river. Again, I don’t believe it but it’s a great story.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

ALR-bishop 04-10-2024 10:43 AM

It is a great hobby story, true or not

ALR-bishop 04-10-2024 10:44 AM

Double post

toppcat 04-10-2024 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zach Wheat (Post 2425703)
In one interview Sy indicates Topps rented a garbage scow to dump the cards because they did not want them stolen from the dumpster. However, there were other ways to get rid of them.

I hope Toppcat is able to chime in...as always, his Topps Archives gives some very insightful and interesting details of the story

My current thoughts are here:

https://www.thetoppsarchives.com/2021/08/highly-doubtful.html


This is the Sports Illustrated article I mention in the above linked post: https://www.si.com/mlb/2021/07/06/to...ow-daily-cover

JollyElm 04-10-2024 03:13 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Ummm...of course it's true!!!!!

Attachment 617801

jethrod3 04-10-2024 11:28 PM

When the legend becomes fact, print the legend!

Republicaninmass 04-11-2024 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toppcat (Post 2425782)
My current thoughts are here:

https://www.thetoppsarchives.com/2021/08/highly-doubtful.html


This is the Sports Illustrated article I mention in the above linked post: https://www.si.com/mlb/2021/07/06/to...ow-daily-cover

Just a note, I belive Rosen find was cello packs

Zach Wheat 04-11-2024 09:04 AM

Great stuff David, thanks for responding. So to summarize some of the issues, Sy was certainly a salesman, and the story about the garbage scow appears to arise around 1975. The origin of the story seems coincidental with a number of other events outlined by Toppcat in several areas of Topps Archives some of which are detailed below.

Additionally, according to interviews with Sy, the 6th and last "set" was printed at half the quantitiy of the other series. Presumably he means the 1st - 4th series as the 5th series of "semi-high #'s" is more rare than the other series. If up to 2 "truckloads" of cases of cards were thrown in to a garbage scow and dumped this equates to 74K - 150K 6th series cards or 1,500-3,000 Mantles. Or if you use a previous interpretation of Sy's story perhaps several million sheets were dumped.

Sy's reasoning for dumping cards in the ocean rather than going to the dumpster - was due to the possibility of theft. Topps had established pipelines for card distribution in Venezuela (Thanks Dave) with 6th series cards turning up there. However, the dumping story seems embellished.

https://www.thetoppsarchives.com/201...-dimaggio.html

Oddly, 5th & 6th series cards turned up at an OPC warehouse in London, Ontario when they were clearing it out. A Youtube video and Toppcat's coverage of that issue is here:

https://www.thetoppsarchives.com/sea...High%20Numbers

Per Mastro's subsequent auction, the box contained both 5th and 6th series cards, which is odd. How did this happen? No clue. Although some jobbers refused to carry the 6th series cards to their retailers, it is clear product was distributed in some fashion nationwide as cards made it to the east and west coast. Were cards really dumped in the ocean? A count of the cards in each series might give us some indication. As previously noted, Sy had indicated the 6th series cards were printed at about half the quantity of other series. D Hanley of Dean's Cards indicated the best way to approximate print ratio for each series was to review his inventory which would follow the approximate print distribution in the set. Assuming this is correct - perhaps a big assumption - the percentage of cards in each series as a % of total inventory of 3,559 cards, is as follows:

1st Series - 25.1%
2nd Series - 18.7%
3rd Series - 17.6%
4th Series 18.7%
5th Series - 10.8%
6th Series - 9%

I am making huge assumptions here, but this appears to follow what Sy had indicated in interviews about the total production of the 6th series. No clue what all this means or if it is even accurate but it does not appear that millions of sheets were dumped. Perhaps the truth is some cards were disposed of in some fashion and the story got embellished over the years. Who really knows.....

JustinD 04-11-2024 09:04 AM

I've never believed this story for a second.

As already mentioned Topps was not flush with cash to waste overhead in such a illogical way. I could believe incineration as it was a very popular method in these instances for that time. The math is just refusing to math on this.

Sy was always one to take advantage of a story and the myth was one of his favorites to wink about. The collectors that love a good conspiracy will always embrace this, however I have seen far of evidence of Bigfoot than a speck of discernable fact in this hobby myth.

As far as marketing goes, there has never been a reason to come out with the truth on this for Topps. More honestly, after this amount of time the only man that could have told the truth passed away in 2014.

This hobby story is forever here to stay, but there is zero truth to it in my mind.

deweyinthehall 04-11-2024 09:08 AM

Also, wasn't Rosen's find from a stash which was farmed out for inclusion with the sale of baseball gloves or some other sort of toy? Guessing they sold them to whatever company that guy's father worked for.

GasHouseGang 04-11-2024 11:08 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 2425915)
Just a note, I believe Rosen find was cello packs

That was Rosen's thought since there weren't any gum stains. Here's part of his ad where he says that is his belief.

toppcat 04-11-2024 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustinD (Post 2425933)
I've never believed this story for a second.

As already mentioned Topps was not flush with cash to waste overhead in such a illogical way. I could believe incineration as it was a very popular method in these instances for that time. The math is just refusing to math on this.

Sy was always one to take advantage of a story and the myth was one of his favorites to wink about. The collectors that love a good conspiracy will always embrace this, however I have seen far of evidence of Bigfoot than a speck of discernable fact in this hobby myth.

As far as marketing goes, there has never been a reason to come out with the truth on this for Topps. More honestly, after this amount of time the only man that could have told the truth passed away in 2014.

This hobby story is forever here to stay, but there is zero truth to it in my mind.

One thing I know for certain is there was no incinerator used by Topps, as confirmed by many who worked there over the years.

I have to think Sy's wife's story is accurate in the sense Topps emptied warehouses out at some point and he spoke of it sometimes while working at Topps but so much of it doesn't add up, at least where the 52 highs and the Mantles are concerned. And why is there no other contemporary account of this? The dumping of garbage at sea may have required a government contract. One of my long standing clients (I have been in the business of adjusting physical damage claims on ships, tugs and barges for 39 years) used to have this contract and I am familiar with how this worked in the 1990's, where there were City of New York garbage piers at various points, where the barges were loaded up but the practice in the Sixties could have been different. But Topps seems to have still used a private carter in the 1960's, which I am aware of via a friend's father who had the contract for a business next door at Bush Terminal. If Sy took a ride on the tug, it may or may not have been via the City of NY contract holder at the time. Which seems kind of far-fetched.

Per Mr. Mint's Insider Guide, in his own (ghost-written?) words:
"There were bricks of gem mint 1952s."

PSA Article: https://www.psacard.com/articles/articleview/7813/pulp-non-fiction-famous-1952-topps-baseball-find

He did this video 15 years ago on the Framingham find:
https://youtu.be/rjckQNXP4Gs?si=E32nlFqcI8K6LE8q

Is there a source for details on wrappers or other elements of the find? Rosen just mentions the "case." UPDATE-above post crossed with mine. I am unaware of anything but five cent wax packs for the highs, has anyone ever seen another form of packaging (or vending) for them? "apparently" indicates to me he didn't know, when he could have easily asked.

JustinD 04-11-2024 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toppcat (Post 2425970)

Per Mr. Mint's Insider Guide, in his own (ghost-written?) words:
"There were bricks of gem mint 1952s."

Is there a source for details on wrappers or other elements of the find? Rosen just mentions the "case." UPDATE-above post crossed with mine. I am unaware of anything but five cent wax packs for the highs, has anyone ever seen another form of packaging (or vending) for them? "apparently" indicates to me he didn't know, when he could have easily asked.

I've heard the Rosen story and it certainly has merit. I think there could be many different possibilities as businesses have suffered from overstock issues forever.

I think the only common explanation that just holds no water (pun totally intended, lol) is the dumping at sea. It just makes no logistical sense in the slightest. However, it is a great story for the hobby and I don't think Sy ever wanted to ruin it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 PM.