Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   N172 Dave Foutz Pickup (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=256914)

rdwyer 06-30-2018 06:31 PM

N172 Dave Foutz Pickup
 
1 Attachment(s)
Can someone tell me what VCP has for a N172 Dave Foutz (a) bat at 45 degrees graded SGC Authentic (Rebacked) would be worth? (Retail price) Nothing on eBay or PWCC Marketplace, or even Card Target. My thinking is that it should be worth more than SCOVBC. TIA

Edit: SGC got it wrong. It's a N172.

rdwyer 06-30-2018 06:52 PM

It's a (a) bat at 45 degrees variation. Sorry

canjond 06-30-2018 07:44 PM

Nothing on VCP for an N173

Joe_G. 06-30-2018 08:12 PM

Sad to see it graded as an N173.

rdwyer 06-30-2018 08:21 PM

I'm pissed SGC could screw that up. I'm gonna take a loss now for their mistake. My only hope is that the pose might pay more.

canjond 06-30-2018 08:45 PM

Not many sales. The last SGC 20 that sold was $92, about 5 years ago.

rdwyer 06-30-2018 08:46 PM

Thanks Jon.

oldjudge 07-01-2018 10:16 AM

It's trimmed at the bottom and a common pose. Maybe if your stars align $100.

oldjudge 07-01-2018 10:18 AM

Anyone with eyes could see that this is not an N173; the mistake on the label shouldn't have affected anything. It would be no different than calling it a poodle.

renoch01 07-01-2018 11:42 AM

This is not surprising coming from an individual that tried to call my cigarette labels from the paten office were not real even though others including REA said REAL. There is a big difference between an N172 & N173 lol.

rdwyer 07-01-2018 06:08 PM

Worked out for me anyway. I got a N172 Cahill & Spider Clark instead. Also picked up near complete sets of 1960 Fleer Baseball and 1961 Fleer Baseball. Only missing 14 cards. Mostly EX & better.

When the label says N173, you would expect a N173. That's what I looked up because I thought SBC knew what they were doing.

Let it go renoch01. You're probably still stuck with those labels, so don't get mad at me.

Fred 07-02-2018 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 1791288)
Anyone with eyes could see that this is not an N173; the mistake on the label shouldn't have affected anything. It would be no different than calling it a poodle.

Is that a French poodle? Miniature poodle? Toy poodle? Ok, we'll stick with the miniature poodle seeing an N173 is a bit larger than an N172.

Agree, label indicating N173 shouldn't hurt. Shouldn't it have an "A" grade if it's trimmed?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:14 AM.