Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Signed T3's (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=232459)

conor912 12-14-2016 06:33 PM

Signed T3's
 
I realized today that in 25 years of collecting I've never once, to my recollection, seen a signed T3. Have they just managed to elude me all these years, or are they really that scarce? Either way, show 'em if you got 'em!

T206Collector 12-14-2016 08:51 PM

I've never seen one, and am fairly surprised about that. I have heard that the Hall of Fame has a signed Walter Johnson T3 in their collection.

prestigecollectibles 12-14-2016 08:56 PM

I searched on pricerealized.com and of the nearly 2000 T3 related lots none of them were autographed.

HRBAKER 12-14-2016 09:00 PM

If only Rube would have had one, there'd be dozens.

T206Collector 12-14-2016 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HRBAKER (Post 1610625)
If only Rube would have had one, there'd be dozens.

Or at least a couple!!

HOF Auto Rookies 12-14-2016 10:23 PM

Didn't Leon have a Hal Chase one signed by Chief Bender?

Republicaninmass 12-14-2016 11:46 PM

There are two graded by PSA
A Devlin and.......


A Mathewson !

T206Collector 12-15-2016 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HOF Auto Rookies (Post 1610638)
Didn't Leon have a Hal Chase one signed by Chief Bender?

I believe it was an M110 signed by Chief Meyers.

T206Collector 12-15-2016 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 1610644)
There are two graded by PSA
A Devlin and.......


A Mathewson !


I'll believe those when I see them, and for the time being consider it an accounting error on the registry.

HOF Auto Rookies 12-15-2016 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T206Collector (Post 1610672)
I believe it was an M110 signed by Chief Meyers.


Located the picture, you are correct. Thanks for the clarification.

Kawika 12-15-2016 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T206Collector (Post 1610674)
I'll believe those when I see them, and for the time being consider it an accounting error on the registry.

I'd never seen or even heard of a signed T3 Matty before this thread but, sure enough, the PSA registry says there is one. I am skeptical too. Like they say "pictures or it didn't happen".

Bruinsfan94 12-15-2016 11:16 AM

"pictures or it didn't happen".[/QUOTE]

+1

conor912 12-15-2016 03:38 PM

Interesting. Most of those players lived 50+ years after 1911 so there was plenty of time, plus I'd think the size would have made them more preferable than a T206, of which there seem to be plenty of signed copies, relatively speaking.

Jobu 12-15-2016 05:41 PM

My guess is that we see so few signed T3s because of their size. I am not an autograph expert, but I think a lot of pre-card show autographs were probably obtained through the mail. Much easier to mail a smaller card or notecard than a T3.

Hankphenom 12-15-2016 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T206Collector (Post 1610621)
I've never seen one, and am fairly surprised about that. I have heard that the Hall of Fame has a signed Walter Johnson T3 in their collection.

In 1991, I was going through the Johnson photo file at the HOF and came across a signed T3 that was mixed in randomly with the pile of photos. I took it to the librarian, Pat Kelly, and told her it would get damaged or stolen if kept in the regular file. There were several other items I recommended be separated from the general file for that reason, but I don't remember what they were.

Leon 12-15-2016 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HOF Auto Rookies (Post 1610638)
Didn't Leon have a Hal Chase one signed by Chief Bender?

It was an M110 Chase signed by Chief Meyers...Got it from another board member off of ebay, about 15 yrs ago, or so.....sold in the first collection sale.

T206Collector 12-15-2016 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hankphenom (Post 1610859)
In 1991, I was going through the Johnson photo file at the HOF and came across a signed T3 that was mixed in randomly with the pile of photos. I took it to the librarian, Pat Kelly, and told her it would get damaged or stolen if kept in the regular file. There were several other items I recommended be separated from the general file for that reason, but I don't remember what they were.

And that's who I heard it from! :D

brass_rat 12-15-2016 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jobu (Post 1610852)
My guess is that we see so few signed T3s because of their size. I am not an autograph expert, but I think a lot of pre-card show autographs were probably obtained through the mail. Much easier to mail a smaller card or notecard than a T3.

Good point, Bryan.

conor912 12-15-2016 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brass_rat (Post 1610915)
Good point, Bryan.

+1, though to see none....ever? Any of us?

Jobu 12-15-2016 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by conor912 (Post 1610932)
+1, though to see none....ever? Any of us?

Well, Hank has seen one (and what a one it must be). :D

I checked PSA for a few numbers:

T3 graded: 6,163
T3 signed: 2 (Devlin and Matty) + the HOF's WaJo=3. But let's call it 2 and assume 1 of PSA's was a mistake.
% signed: 2/6,163*100 = 0.032%

T206 graded: 197,763
T206 signed: 58
% signed: 58/197,763 = 0.029%

All the usual caveats that come with pop report data exist, but if we assume that T3 were a lot less likely to be signed due to their size and the much smaller number of both subjects and cards produced, I don't know that we should expect that there are more than 2-5 signed cards.

conor912 12-15-2016 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jobu (Post 1610949)
Well, Hank has seen one (and what a one it must be). :D

I checked PSA for a few numbers:

T3 graded: 6,163
T3 signed: 2 (Devlin and Matty) + the HOF's WaJo=3. But let's call it 2 and assume 1 of PSA's was a mistake.
% signed: 2/6,163*100 = 0.032%

T206 graded: 197,763
T206 signed: 58
% signed: 58/197,763 = 0.029%

All the usual caveats that come with pop report data exist, but if we assume that T3 were a lot less likely to be signed due to their size and the much smaller number of both subjects and cards produced, I don't know that we should expect that there are more than 2-5 signed cards.

So by that calculation those could be the only 3 in existence. Certainly possible, but I'd venture to guess there's more out there buried in family heirlooms....at least I'd like to think so.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:47 PM.