Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   T202 Lord Catches His Man - Joe Jackson poll (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=124211)

Leon 05-26-2010 12:45 PM

T202 Lord Catches His Man - Joe Jackson poll
 
On the whole "T202 Lord Catches His Man - Joe Jackson center panel" debate, a while back, I merged a new thread that was started as I felt all of the thoughts should be in one thread and didn't want the whole front page dominated by 1 debate. However, I think it will be fun to see what percentage of the board feels that the center panel of the T202 in question is Joe Jackson? Your responses will be seen publicy ....
regards

Jacklitsch 05-26-2010 12:47 PM

I do.

alanu 05-26-2010 12:48 PM

me too

teetwoohsix 05-26-2010 01:07 PM

I went ahead and picked that I 100% think it is JJ. The 91-99% would've been the "safer" way to vote, but I'm "going all in":)

And, I'm not afraid of being wrong, I've been wrong many times in life- but I'm now convinced that it is Jackson.

Sincerely,Clayton

Leon 05-26-2010 01:10 PM

all in fun and ...interesting
 
I know we have been a bit overwhelmed with this whole debate but I do think it will be interesting where this will end up on a percentage basis. I think I voted for the 61%-80% range...
I wonder if I should have done it as a closed poll so folks wouldn't be able to see how others voted? Maybe I will do a poll to see? :o (J/K)

Robextend 05-26-2010 01:11 PM

I voted 91-99%...it is closer to 100, but not quite there!

barrysloate 05-26-2010 01:12 PM

I voted in the 80% range even though it can't be 80% him. It's either 100% Joe Jackson, or 0%.

Leon 05-26-2010 01:15 PM

of course
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barrysloate (Post 812200)
I voted in the 80% range even though it can't be 80% him. It's either 100% Joe Jackson, or 0%.

Of course it's either 100% or 0% technically.This poll is only for how strongly you feel it is, or isn't, him.

Abravefan11 05-26-2010 01:15 PM

I voted 100% as I believe the newspaper photo and the T202 image were taken during the same play. Since I believe that then the T202 has to be Joe.

martyogelvie 05-26-2010 01:17 PM

call me brain dead but i voted 90%

teetwoohsix 05-26-2010 01:18 PM

Exactly Barry ;),,,,,that's why I picked 100%.That's not the only reason,,,with everything that has been presented-I do believe it's him.

Clayton

brett 05-26-2010 01:29 PM

I'm slightly leaning towards it being him.:D:D:D:

Robextend 05-26-2010 01:34 PM

So far according to Brett, 78% of this board are dopes.

Ladder7 05-26-2010 01:36 PM

The news photo did it for me. I thought the T202 fellow was just to pie-faced to be JJJ.

Good work by Brett and the others for the detective work.

150%

orator1 05-26-2010 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abravefan11 (Post 812203)
I voted 100% as I believe the newspaper photo and the T202 image were taken during the same play. Since I believe that then the T202 has to be Joe.

100% agree - The newspaper photo comparison clinched it for me.
I think the answer would have to be 100% if the poll question was written as follows:
"What percentage think the newspaper photo and center panel are from the same play?"

The curves in the pant stripe match exactly in both photos. Add this fact to the photo matches Tim and others pointed out and it must be the same play.

vintagebaseball 05-26-2010 01:41 PM

I would have to agree also 100% besides what do I have to lose:D

brett 05-26-2010 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robextend (Post 812216)
So far according to Brett, 78% of this board are dopes.

No, genius... but 80% of the people do think there's a better than 80% chance that it's him. That means they're all believers. People will always leave a little room for doubt if they're given that option. I would have rather the new poll simply stated "do you believe it's him, yes or no".

Leon 05-26-2010 01:48 PM

a million ways to do one
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by brett (Post 812222)
No, genius... but 80% of the people do think there's a better than 80% chance that it's him. That means they're all believers. People will always leave a little room for doubt if they're given that option. I would have rather the new poll simply stated "do you believe it's him, yes or no".

There are a million ways to do a poll. I felt this would be more accurate. For most of us, as I am certain the poll will show (and you will begrudgingly have to concede to), it's not black or white. You don't have to agree, but the poll will inevitably show it's not what you would like it to be and profess it to be (which is everyone agreeing it's 100%). (at least not yet)

JasonL 05-26-2010 01:52 PM

indicative of my normal situation...
 
I ain't sure about anything!

Robextend 05-26-2010 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brett (Post 812222)
No, genius... but 80% of the people do think there's a better than 80% chance that it's him. That means they're all believers. People will always leave a little room for doubt if they're given that option. I would have rather the new poll simply stated "do you believe it's him, yes or no".

That was my whole point, wasn't it good enough for you that the majority of people were convinced that it might be him? You were saying how if you weren't 100% sure then you were brain-dead. I guess you softened your stance a little finally.

sox1903wschamp 05-26-2010 03:32 PM

I voted and can we also start a poll on how many of the posts in that thread could have been avoided by some "adult behavior"? I would vote about 50%....give or take.

Abravefan11 05-26-2010 05:14 PM

I would like to hear from those that are less than 90%. What at this point is keeping you from feeling stronger that it is Joe?

Paul and I both agree that if you think the newspaper photo and T202 panel were taken at the same time that it must be Joe. Do you disagree with this? Do you have doubts about the two photos being taken at the same time?

As I've become more comfortable with my position I would like to hear more from the other side.

Peter_Spaeth 05-26-2010 05:41 PM

90-99 percent here. I am curious as to the rationale of folks who felt it was less than 50 percent, if they care to share -- are we missing something?

Tcards-Please 05-26-2010 05:50 PM

50%??? I would love to hear the rationale from the person that says 0%. Even if you are skeptical, what is the reasoning behind a "NO WAY" call? Is the person that said no way, the person that took the picture or a spectator that day:D

I would find it really hard to give a flat out 0% chance. Just my opinion.

r/
Frank

teetwoohsix 05-26-2010 07:38 PM

Ditto what Tim, Peter, and Frank said.

Clayton

sox1903wschamp 05-26-2010 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sox1903wschamp (Post 812289)
I voted and can we also start a poll on how many of the posts in that thread could have been avoided by some "adult behavior"? I would vote about 50%....give or take.

Let me clear one thing up. I voted 91-99% on JJ being JJ. My vote of 50% was on my declaration of a fictitious poll on avoided posts on the JJ thread :)
It was great work except the non adult behavior...

Bicem 05-26-2010 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 812336)
90-99 percent here. I am curious as to the rationale of folks who felt it was less than 50 percent, if they care to share -- are we missing something?

well I voted w/o reading the other thread... whoops! :o Now that I have read the entire thread, I'd vote in the 80% range. Good stuff!

Abravefan11 05-26-2010 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bicem (Post 812387)
well I voted w/o reading the other thread... whoops! :o Now that I have read the entire thread, I'd vote in the 80% range. Good stuff!

Jeff - Do you still have doubt that the newspaper photo and the T202 photo were taken during the same play? I'm not looking to brow beat anyone but am just curious with the given information what your reservations are for not being more sure it's Joe. Thanks.

Steve D 05-26-2010 10:36 PM

I clicked 81%-90%.

I do not feel completely 100% comfortable in saying the two photos are of the same play. The newspaper photo is just too dark and grainy for me to make an intelligent decision. I see what I think are anomalies between the two photos, and until they are completely resolved, I just can't say that it is Joe Jackson on the T202.

Steve

Abravefan11 05-26-2010 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve D (Post 812435)
I clicked 81%-90%.
I see what I think are anomalies between the two photos, and until they are completely resolved, I just can't say that it is Joe Jackson on the T202.

Steve

Steve - Could you share the anomalies to give those of us that haven't seen them something to ponder or possibly explain.

Nap Rucker - The Southpaw 07-12-2010 11:52 AM

I do.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 AM.