Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   OK. Who got this beauty? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=250177)

Brian Van Horn 01-16-2018 07:00 PM

OK. Who got this beauty?
 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Honus-Wagne...p2047675.l2557

The card actually sold twice 21 minutes apart:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Honus-Wagne...AAAOSwp7FaXqw9

murphy8276 01-16-2018 07:25 PM

Probably suffered from ebay's double listing bug. He will have to explain to some poor guy that his rat eaten card was won by another bidder.

Brian Van Horn 01-16-2018 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by murphy8276 (Post 1739371)
Probably suffered from ebay's double listing bug. He will have to explain to some poor guy that his rat eaten card was won by another bidder.

Actually, it was the same guy.

Bored5000 01-16-2018 07:52 PM

At least the seller was up front and honest that the card has "some discoloration." I would definitely be upset if I was the buyer and noticed some discoloration when the card arrived that was not otherwise noted.

Stampsfan 01-16-2018 11:59 PM

It's so discolored, it almost looks like part of the card is missing.

clydepepper 01-17-2018 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Van Horn (Post 1739374)
Actually, it was the same guy.



He'll just use the second one for parts.



-

CrackaJackKid 01-17-2018 12:50 PM

Hmmm
 
Maybe the card was purchased so fast that the seller didn’t think it had even listed so he relisted it and the buyer bought it again and then got refunded his money for the second buy. You guys are quite comical. Lol

Stampsfan 01-17-2018 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrackaJackKid (Post 1739518)
Maybe the card was purchased so fast that the seller didn’t think it had even listed so he relisted it and the buyer bought it again and then got refunded his money for the second buy. You guys are quite comical. Lol

Not likely. We prefer a good conspiracy theory vs. some logical explanation.

:D

terjung 01-17-2018 12:57 PM

Interestingly, the lot listing differs for the two lots. One says 104 year old 1914 CJ and the other says 103 year old 1915 CJ.

It's obviously not a '15 (which was listed and ended first). Perhaps he listed it as a 1915, then learned it was a 1914 and relisted it after thinking he took down the prior listing.

CrackaJackKid 01-17-2018 01:06 PM

Answer..
 
And Brian, I’d PM you and tell you exactly what happened but you felt the need to block me. Oh well.

Leon 01-19-2018 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Van Horn (Post 1739366)

I like the explanation of the 2nd one being used for parts :)...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:38 PM.