Cozumeleno |
01-20-2015 10:55 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Econteachert205
(Post 1369276)
so this seems as good a time as any... do you think tpgs actually view grades like nrmnt as universal terms? like can you picture a 1972 topps card in such condition ever garnering such a grade? I honestly don't get it.
|
Absolutely not - and that's kind of my beef, to be honest. Imagine if you went to a card shop and they were selling a card a few years old with stains, paper loss, etc. as NM. It'd be utterly ridiculous. You don't need to look far to find that the grading is clearly eased up for older cards. For example, here's a Barry Bonds 1987 Topps PSA 7, which is pretty perfect with the exception of some very light wear to some corners. http://www.ebay.com/itm/1987-Topps-B...item3ceec6f144
I'm not in favor of it, but I can live with them allowing for some discoloration - but that's really it for me. NM should be NM regardless of year. That's why NM cards from that era command such premiums. A good example of why the grades should not be fluid is a Beckett Price Guide, which lists a pre-1948 card (I believe that's the cutoff, anyway) as 100% of the book value in EX condition. If it's NM, it is 300%. If you use that pricing, there's no way that they should be more flexible with grades for older cards.
IMO.
|