Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   I totally forgot PWCC had an auction ending tonight (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=271288)

Rhotchkiss 07-14-2019 08:15 PM

I totally forgot PWCC had an auction ending tonight
 
A buddy just texted me that “prices seemed soft”. I had no idea what he was talking about until he reminded me that a PWCC auction was ending tonight. I remembered that an auction had started a few days ago, but I did not follow a single lot and had no idea it was closing tonight. Anyone else take this one off?

Throttlesteer 07-14-2019 08:27 PM

I watched to see if there was any impact. I disagree with your buddy. Prices seemed just as silly as usual (e.g. $4k for a PSA 5 T206 Speaker). There are plenty who still want to buy from PWCC.

scooter729 07-14-2019 08:28 PM

I've been following some of the sales, and haven't seen too much softness in the ones I've been looking at. I may not be looking at all the cards, but the handful I wanted to watch were coming in close to, if not higher than, recent prior sales.

Johnny630 07-14-2019 08:31 PM

Business as usual the beat goes on....

Rhotchkiss 07-14-2019 08:38 PM

Well, soft or not, I didn’t bid. Hell, I totally forgot an auction was ending. Probably the first time in 3-4 years I didn’t bid on something. I have to imagine I am not the only one.

PiratesWS1979 07-14-2019 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Throttlesteer (Post 1899009)
I watched to see if there was any impact. I disagree with your buddy. Prices seemed just as silly as usual (e.g. $4k for a PSA 5 T206 Speaker). There are plenty who still want to buy from PWCC.


But the Speaker had EXTREMELY LARGE borders. Hopefully PSA and SGC keeps a file on that card.

Steve D 07-14-2019 09:04 PM

Well, I was just finally able to pick up a T202 Wood/Speaker, Speaker Rounding Third, after years of searching and being outbid.

:)
Steve

Peter_Spaeth 07-14-2019 09:15 PM

Never again.

Throttlesteer 07-14-2019 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PiratesWS1979 (Post 1899014)
But the Speaker had EXTREMELY LARGE borders. Hopefully PSA and SGC keeps a file on that card.

True and agree. It's a nice card that maybe should have grabbed $2-2500.

oldjudge 07-14-2019 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899033)
Never again.

+1

frankbmd 07-14-2019 10:06 PM

I didn’t look.

I didn’t bid.

I didn’t forget.

No regrets.

bounce 07-14-2019 10:07 PM

there's some of everything. a few of the items mentioned were strong. the ruth and gehrig goudeys seemed pretty strong as well.

however, i'd say the matty portraits were definitely lower than they'd been and those cards were nice. johnson pitching was probably disappointing to the consignor, and the young portraits weren't crazy. even a couple of the cobbs seemed somewhat reasonable to me.

it's only one night, but so far it's not records across the board like had been going on for the past two years or more. will be interesting to see what happens as the auction continues.

Bicem 07-14-2019 10:38 PM

No thanks, too many better places to get stuff.

irv 07-14-2019 10:42 PM

I haven't bid in any of their auctions now for 2 years and have zero future plans of doing so.

Vintageclout 07-15-2019 05:13 AM

Pwcc
 
Soft? I Don’t think so....

SGC 4.5 Green Cobb - $15K
PSA 4.5 Cobb Bat Off - $6K
PSA 4.5 Red Cobb - $5.8K
SGC 5 #144 Goudey Ruth - $10.6K
PSA 5 Brunner’s Young - Nearly $6K
PSA 4 M116 Wagner - $4.7K
PSA 5 T206 Speaker - Nearly $4K
PSA 5 US Caramel Gehrig - $6.1K

Just a few examples of strong pricing.

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 05:21 AM

To my eye the Caramel Gehrig was really white.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1932-U-S-Ca...p2047675.l2557

This natural beauty boasts an overall cleanliness not normally seen on the issue with virtually zero product toning present.

Maybe.

Why are we seeing all these super bright cards slabbed by S_C recently?

chalupacollects 07-15-2019 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss (Post 1899013)
Well, soft or not, I didn’t bid. Hell, I totally forgot an auction was ending. Probably the first time in 3-4 years I didn’t bid on something. I have to imagine I am not the only one.

The therapy is working? :D

Kingcobb 07-15-2019 05:51 AM

Pwcc
 
Prices were pretty strong PSA 4 commons averaging 120 5's close to 200 +. HOFer's were ridiculous.

1952boyntoncollector 07-15-2019 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny630 (Post 1899011)
Business as usual the beat goes on....

yep dont know why poeple say they arent bidding...when prices speak for themselves...

ullmandds 07-15-2019 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899069)
To my eye the Caramel Gehrig was really white.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1932-U-S-Ca...p2047675.l2557

This natural beauty boasts an overall cleanliness not normally seen on the issue with virtually zero product toning present.

Maybe.

Why are we seeing all these super bright cards slabbed by S_C recently?

I don't think there's any question that gehrig's been chemically bathed/bleached!

Rhotchkiss 07-15-2019 07:42 AM

I have not looked at the prices/checked the auction, but it sounds like I got some bad info that prices were soft (the Speaker sounds silly). That said, I watched True Romance (great movie - classic) with my wife last night and was not checking the phone every 3 minutes like I had done many times over in the past. And it was great! Yes, the therapy is working.

Between Heritage, REA, Memory Lane (sick auction coming up BTW), LOTG, Mile High, Brockelman, Sterling, Goldin, SCP, Baggers, etc etc., not to mention regular shows in Chantilly and Philly and maybe the national (or white plains), I have plenty of options and opportunities.

So, for the foreseeable future, PWCC is not an option for me. And, for now, I will ignore their sales on VCP as comps.

1952boyntoncollector 07-15-2019 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1899078)
I don't think there's any question that gehrig's been chemically bathed/bleached!

so if someone bought this card thinking it was bleached (bought the card not the holder) and was very confidant that it was like you, are they a future victim if there is more evidence of it..

ullmandds 07-15-2019 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1899098)
so if someone bought this card thinking it was bleached (bought the card not the holder) and was very confidant that it was like you, are they a future victim if there is more evidence of it..

im not following your "thought" process?

1952boyntoncollector 07-15-2019 08:23 AM

If someone stated on net54, i bought that card, and i KNOW it was bleached but i bought it anyway, and 2 months later there is a photo of the card 3 grades lower that sold 2 months prior to the purchaser that bought the card

are they avictim even though they KNOW it was bleached/altered when they bought (and posted admission of such on net54) the card and now want to use the PSA guarantee or whatever its called or ask for money back for PWCC...

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1899078)
I don't think there's any question that gehrig's been chemically bathed/bleached!

This is the third or fourth such card we've seen recently in an S_C holder that looked (to my eye) way too white. I don't know what's going on. A card that white, or as white as that Leaf Jackie was, should raise red flags.

Republicaninmass 07-15-2019 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899069)
To my eye the Caramel Gehrig was really white.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1932-U-S-Ca...p2047675.l2557

This natural beauty boasts an overall cleanliness not normally seen on the issue with virtually zero product toning present.

Maybe.

Why are we seeing all these super bright cards slabbed by S_C recently?


I see what you did there, no more G in SGC

Republicaninmass 07-15-2019 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PiratesWS1979 (Post 1899014)
But the Speaker had EXTREMELY LARGE borders. Hopefully PSA and SGC keeps a file on that card.


Before Moser takes a file to it

ullmandds 07-15-2019 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899104)
This is the third or fourth such card we've seen recently in an S_C holder that looked (to my eye) way too white. I don't know what's going on. A card that white, or as white as that Leaf Jackie was, should raise red flags.

Sadly I think the reality is that some alterations are not detectable...atleast not with current techniques used by SGC/PSA/Beckett.

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1899110)
Sadly I think the reality is that some alterations are not detectable...atleast not with current techniques used by SGC/PSA/Beckett.

How is it not detectable, you and I see it plain as day.

ullmandds 07-15-2019 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899113)
How is it not detectable, you and I see it plain as day.

I dunno how to answer that, Pete????? Borders on 85 year old cardboard just aren't that white in nature...only after treated not to mention the white speckles throughout the background.

bnorth 07-15-2019 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899113)
How is it not detectable, you and I see it plain as day.

Are you being paid not to see it?:eek:

Snapolit1 07-15-2019 10:02 AM

Peter - please cease from being so cynical. This card looks exactly what I'd imagine a card that was sitting in the bottom of a candy box many decades ago would look like. Pristine blinding white. Snow white. White as the rice I am enjoyng for lunch.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899069)
To my eye the Caramel Gehrig was really white.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1932-U-S-Ca...p2047675.l2557

This natural beauty boasts an overall cleanliness not normally seen on the issue with virtually zero product toning present.

Maybe.

Why are we seeing all these super bright cards slabbed by S_C recently?


Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1899117)
I dunno how to answer that, Pete????? Borders on 85 year old cardboard just aren't that white in nature...only after treated not to mention the white speckles throughout the background.

That issue is notorious for toning. Even Brent notes, without a trace of irony, how unusually white it is. LOL.

topcat61 07-15-2019 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scooter729 (Post 1899010)
I've been following some of the sales, and haven't seen too much softness in the ones I've been looking at. I may not be looking at all the cards, but the handful I wanted to watch were coming in close to, if not higher than, recent prior sales.

Why would anyone want to continue doing business with this company? Certainly not on the level in any way, shape or form. I check the bids of PWCC's cards and check the % the bidder has had with them.

bnorth 07-15-2019 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899122)
That issue is notorious for toning. Even Brent notes, without a trace of irony, how unusually white it is. LOL.

Just snowballing here, maybe he uses those type of descriptions as a code. His "real" friends know that means STAY FAR AWAY.

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topcat61 (Post 1899124)
Why would anyone want to continue doing business with this company? Certainly not on the level in any way, shape or form. I check the bids of PWCC's cards and check the % the bidder has had with them.

Because they are selling cards people want.

BeanTown 07-15-2019 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899033)
Never again.

+1

They will slowly lose legit buyers and consignors. They will be forced to stop doing unethical money making practices. The once all mighty eBay seller known as PWCC, will become an after thought within two years.

bobbyw8469 07-15-2019 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeanTown (Post 1899138)
+1

They will slowly lose legit buyers and consignors. They will be forced to stop doing unethical money making practices. The once all mighty eBay seller known as PWCC, will become an after thought within two years.

Same thing happened to GlacierBayDVD. And JayandMarie1centCDs. They were both considered too big to fail. They both crumbled.

RedsFan1941 07-15-2019 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topcat61 (Post 1899124)
Why would anyone want to continue doing business with this company? Certainly not on the level in any way, shape or form. I check the bids of PWCC's cards and check the % the bidder has had with them.

where else are you going to get a brown lenox?

perezfan 07-15-2019 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeanTown (Post 1899138)
+1

They will slowly lose legit buyers and consignors. They will be forced to stop doing unethical money making practices. The once all mighty eBay seller known as PWCC, will become an after thought within two years.

Hopefully this will be the case. But the fact that prices are still very strong indicates that word of the scandal has not spread beyond Net54 and BO. It really demonstrates how many collectors there are who do not frequent these forums.

I know that many (less vocal) people here are probably still buying from PWCC because they want "the stuff"... but a big chunk here is not. And the boycotters are barely impacting prices realized (if at all). So until the word somehow reaches a larger audience, we might not see PWCC's demise anytime soon.

The best short-term opportunity for increasing exposure is obviously at The National. Hopefully, something will happen in Chicago, which will reveal their corruption to a greater audience. Otherwise we're likely in for more of the same deception.

irv 07-15-2019 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1899078)
I don't think there's any question that gehrig's been chemically bathed/bleached!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899104)
This is the third or fourth such card we've seen recently in an S_C holder that looked (to my eye) way too white. I don't know what's going on. A card that white, or as white as that Leaf Jackie was, should raise red flags.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1899110)
Sadly I think the reality is that some alterations are not detectable...atleast not with current techniques used by SGC/PSA/Beckett.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899113)
How is it not detectable, you and I see it plain as day.

Like I mentioned to Swarmee in another thread, if there is no way to detect the bleach/chemicals, how can they reject it?

I agree it is definitely suspect but if there is no, 100% proof, that it has seen a chemical bath, then their hands are tied.

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1899146)
Like I mentioned to Swarmee in another thread, if there is no way to detect the bleach/chemicals, how can they reject it?

I agree it is definitely suspect but if there is no, 100% proof, that it has seen a chemical bath, then their hands are tied.

Cards get rejected for EVIDENCE of trimming, etc., there is no 100 percent proof standard, don't know where you are coming up with that. The human eye is probably the best evidence in any event. That's how most alterations are detected. Do you think they're putting cards through lab tests?

packs 07-15-2019 12:38 PM

Lets say a card is bleached, will it disintegrate over time? What are you left with in 20 years?

pokerplyr80 07-15-2019 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899152)
Cards get rejected for EVIDENCE of trimming, etc., there is no 100 percent proof standard, don't know where you are coming up with that. The human eye is probably the best evidence in any event. That's how most alterations are detected. Do you think they're putting cards through lab tests?

What are you suggesting then? If a vintage card looks too clean it shouldn't be graded because it was probably bleached? I'm not sure how this could be detected without some kind of forensic test, and don't think a card should be rejected without some kind of evidence that it was, or probably was altered.

Looking too clean or white is not enough evidence in my opinion for a TPG to reject a card.

trambo 07-15-2019 01:06 PM

I bid on 2 t205's last night in the PWCC. I bid accordingly to what I thought they were worth and used a snipe program to do the bidding. I lost both auctions.

Auction 1 was the same card listed and sold by PWCC in February (same PSA cert on the card). Of the bids by the winning bidder in all auctions, 66% of their bids were for PWCC auctions.

Auction 2-new item. Of the bids by the winning bidder in all auctions, 41% of their bids were for PWCC auctions.

The above tells me that at least auction 1 was a shill bid but most likely both were.

I wasn't too broken up that I didn't win the cards (ok..not broken up at all) but it crystallized my opinion of the shady tactics PWCC employs. Nothing to do here really but stay away from PWCC auctions as many have said. I'm sure this sort of thing has been posted more than once but thought my first hand experience may help someone even if it's buried on this thread.

drcy 07-15-2019 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snapolit1 (Post 1899121)
Peter - please cease from being so cynical. This card looks exactly what I'd imagine a card that was sitting in the bottom of a candy box many decades ago would look like. Pristine blinding white. Snow white. White as the rice I am enjoyng for lunch.

A rule of thumb is to avoid Pre-War baseball cards you can read in the dark by.

irv 07-15-2019 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899152)
Cards get rejected for EVIDENCE of trimming, etc., there is no 100 percent proof standard, don't know where you are coming up with that. The human eye is probably the best evidence in any event. That's how most alterations are detected. Do you think they're putting cards through lab tests?

Quote:

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 (Post 1899154)
What are you suggesting then? If a vintage card looks too clean it shouldn't be graded because it was probably bleached? I'm not sure how this could be detected without some kind of forensic test, and don't think a card should be rejected without some kind of evidence that it was, or probably was altered.

Looking too clean or white is not enough evidence in my opinion for a TPG to reject a card.

What Jesse says, Peter.
With trimming, one can compare to other cards or look for the telltale signs. Coloring is the same, tilt the card (if it's that easy?)

A clean card that was put away between pgs or out of the light altogether since new, I am sure would still be fairly clean, no?

Trust me, I'm as pissed as you are about this whole scandal and I am not trying to defend anyone here, but if the bleach and/or chemicals are not detectable how can a TPG reject the card based on them assuming the card is too clean looking?

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1899164)
What Jesse says, Peter.
With trimming, one can compare to other cards or look for the telltale signs. Coloring is the same, tilt the card (if it's that easy?)

A clean card that was put away between pgs or out of the light altogether since new, I am sure would still be fairly clean, no?

Trust me, I'm as pissed as you are about this whole scandal and I am not trying to defend anyone here, but if the bleach and/or chemicals are not detectable how can a TPG reject the card based on them assuming the card is too clean looking?

Do you need a lab test to tell you if someone is probably drunk, Dale?
And why is it these cleaned cards all seem to be S_C?

Bugsy 07-15-2019 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1899164)
What Jesse says, Peter.
With trimming, one can compare to other cards or look for the telltale signs. Coloring is the same, tilt the card (if it's that easy?)

A clean card that was put away between pgs or out of the light altogether since new, I am sure would still be fairly clean, no?

Trust me, I'm as pissed as you are about this whole scandal and I am not trying to defend anyone here, but if the bleach and/or chemicals are not detectable how can a TPG reject the card based on them assuming the card is too clean looking?

Bleached cards will often illuminate under a black light.

Steve D 07-15-2019 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 (Post 1899154)
What are you suggesting then? If a vintage card looks too clean it shouldn't be graded because it was probably bleached? I'm not sure how this could be detected without some kind of forensic test, and don't think a card should be rejected without some kind of evidence that it was, or probably was altered.

Looking too clean or white is not enough evidence in my opinion for a TPG to reject a card.


If that were the case (rejecting cards that are "too clean"), the Black Swamp find, for one, would have never been graded.

Steve

ullmandds 07-15-2019 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve D (Post 1899198)
If that were the case (rejecting cards that are "too clean"), the Black Swamp find, for one, would have never been graded.

Steve

BSF cards were stored in paper practically from the time they were made and still did not have SNOW WHITE borders like the gehrig...or other bleached cards.

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1899201)
BSF cards were stored in paper practically from the time they were made and still did not have SNOW WHITE borders like the gehrig...or other bleached cards.

Plus there was provenance explaining the BSF cards.

Throttlesteer 07-15-2019 04:39 PM

One other possibility is to manipulate the scans to make the borders or colors brighter. I'm not saying that bleach was or wasn't used, but it's another way to make the card look good for prospective bidders.

deadballera 07-15-2019 04:41 PM

picked up a couple of T206's last night.

It seemed that prices were lower than what they normally go for. I personally thought some of the lower prices were due to Gavelsnipe not working.

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Throttlesteer (Post 1899209)
One other possibility is to manipulate the scans to make the borders or colors brighter. I'm not saying that bleach was or wasn't used, but it's another way to make the card look good for prospective bidders.

Read the description which I quoted.

Throttlesteer 07-15-2019 04:50 PM

I did. It references clean, free of toning. But. It doesnt necessarily negate my comment. A quick Google of 1932 US Caramels shows several old PSA examples with similar borders. Again, I'm not claiming it wasnt bleached, but I'm not as sure about this one as some.

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Throttlesteer (Post 1899214)
I did. It references clean, free of toning. But. It doesnt necessarily negate my comment.

PWCC stickered card, US Caramel described as free of toning or nearly so, plus scan that is blinding white. I'll rely on my experience and common sense here, do as you wish.

RedsFan1941 07-15-2019 05:21 PM

I do not know what is more puzzling. That people on this board continue to do business with pwcc or that they post about it like it’s nothing. congrats to everyone on their pwcc pickups. I hope every card is not what it was represented to be.

bnorth 07-15-2019 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedsFan1941 (Post 1899227)
I do not know what is more puzzling. That people on this board continue to do business with pwcc or that they post about it like it’s nothing. congrats to everyone on their pwcc pickups. I hope every card is not what it was represented to be.

It is seriously puzzling but with all the ethical questions I have seen posted over the years I am not surprised. The bright side is some very unethical people are honest about it.:D

Steve D 07-15-2019 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedsFan1941 (Post 1899227)
I do not know what is more puzzling. That people on this board continue to do business with pwcc or that they post about it like it’s nothing. congrats to everyone on their pwcc pickups. I hope every card is not what it was represented to be.


Here's why I choose to continue to bid with PWCC:

I live in an area (South-Central Texas), where the closest card show occurs twice a year, and is 200 miles away. I am dealing with chronic medical/physical issues that mean I'm no longer able to travel that far. I'm also not able to walk very far without difficulty.

That leaves ebay and auction houses as my only resource for adding to my collection. Believe me, I look all over for the cards I want (including the BST Forum here), and for the most part, PWCC is one of the very few that seem to get what I'm wanting.

I have always been a "Buy the card, and not the holder!" person. A large amount of the time, I disregard a card on my wantlist even though it is in the grade I want; because it doesn't have the "eye-appeal" I'm looking for, or the seller doesn't provide large enough front/back scans. I carefully examine every card I consider buying.

I totally understand everyone's feelings about the current issues; I tend to agree with them. I do not feel, however, that I can simply disregard PWCC (or anyone else) out-of-hand, if I want to continue collecting.

Steve

Kenny Cole 07-15-2019 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve D (Post 1899278)
Here's why I choose to continue to bid with PWCC:

I live in an area (South-Central Texas), where the closest card show occurs twice a year, and is 200 miles away. I am dealing with chronic medical/physical issues that mean I'm no longer able to travel that far. I'm also not able to walk very far without difficulty.

That leaves ebay and auction houses as my only resource for adding to my collection. Believe me, I look all over for the cards I want (including the BST Forum here), and for the most part, PWCC is one of the very few that seem to get what I'm wanting.

I have always been a "Buy the card, and not the holder!" person. A large amount of the time, I disregard a card on my wantlist even though it is in the grade I want; because it doesn't have the "eye-appeal" I'm looking for, or the seller doesn't provide large enough front/back scans. I carefully examine every card I consider buying.

I totally understand everyone's feelings about the current issues; I tend to agree with them. I do not feel, however, that I can simply disregard PWCC (or anyone else) out-of-hand, if I want to continue collecting.

Steve

I respectfully suggest that you are exactly the type of prey PWCC is looking for. If you choose to do that after all that has been said here, good luck to you. I personally think you are making a huge mistake, but everyone is entitled to make his or her own decision. I hope that it works out for you.

bounce 07-15-2019 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vintageclout (Post 1899066)
Soft? I Don’t think so....

SGC 4.5 Green Cobb - $15K
PSA 4.5 Cobb Bat Off - $6K
PSA 4.5 Red Cobb - $5.8K
SGC 5 #144 Goudey Ruth - $10.6K
PSA 5 Brunner’s Young - Nearly $6K
PSA 4 M116 Wagner - $4.7K
PSA 5 T206 Speaker - Nearly $4K
PSA 5 US Caramel Gehrig - $6.1K

Just a few examples of strong pricing.

SGC 6.5 Wajo pitching - $4.1k
PSA 2.5 Matty portrait - $1k
PSA 4.5 Matty portrait - $2k
PSA 6 Matty dark cap - $3.2k
PSA 4 Cy Young portrait - $2.3k

Just a few examples of not strong pricing.

And either way, strong or not, they’re going to hit VCP.

bounce 07-15-2019 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedsFan1941 (Post 1899227)
I do not know what is more puzzling. That people on this board continue to do business with pwcc or that they post about it like it’s nothing. congrats to everyone on their pwcc pickups. I hope every card is not what it was represented to be.

Lots of focus on the bidders, but what about the consignors? Isn’t that really where it starts? Takes both to tango, but surely all the PWCC consignors aren’t scam artists?

Just pointing out there are multiple facets to this whole situation.

Kenny Cole 07-15-2019 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bounce (Post 1899284)
Lots of focus on the bidders, but what about the consignors? Isn’t that really where it starts? Takes both to tango, but surely all the PWCC consignors aren’t scam artists?

Just pointing out there are multiple facets to this whole situation.

At this point, I don't which are and which aren't. But I damn sure know some are scammers. That, in and of itself, is enough for me to say I'm out. Maybe I will miss some cards on my want list that are actually good. But I have no confidence that is true at this point. So I will take a hard pass on that. I can wait.

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 09:50 PM

They have a card I've been looking for for a long time, a 1969 Topps Super Bob Gibson. I know the card is good because nobody trims a 1969 card with huge rounded corners lol. So it goes. Pass.

Kenny Cole 07-15-2019 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899292)
They have a card I've been looking for for a long time, a 1969 Topps Super Bob Gibson. I know the card is good because nobody trims a 1969 card with huge rounded corners lol. So it goes. Pass.

Right thing to do IMO, but it still sucks massively. I get it.

Aquarian Sports Cards 07-15-2019 09:54 PM

So not to change topics but some of you know I've been working behind the scenes. Does anyone know for a certainty that the FBI or other law enforcement is involved? This info isn't for publication and you won't be quoted. It is just to satisfy some people who need to be careful what gets said for obvious reasons. Please PM me if you have knowledge (not conjecture) to share.

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards (Post 1899294)
So not to change topics but some of you know I've been working behind the scenes. Does anyone know for a certainty that the FBI or other law enforcement is involved? This info isn't for publication and you won't be quoted. It is just to satisfy some people who need to be careful what gets said for obvious reasons. Please PM me if you have knowledge (not conjecture) to share.

Good luck.

Brian Van Horn 07-15-2019 10:06 PM

Just curious when this whole matter ends up on "American Greed".

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenny Cole (Post 1899293)
Right thing to do IMO, but it still sucks massively. I get it.

It sucks worse that he does what he does.

Kenny Cole 07-15-2019 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899297)
It sucks worse that he does what he does.

True dat.

Peter_Spaeth 07-15-2019 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenny Cole (Post 1899299)
True dat.

Imagine, after everything that's been revealed, he still would have sold that bad PSA 2 T3 Cobb with a buried and bullshit addendum. For me, along with telling me that Gary had essentially retired, a defining moment.

Kenny Cole 07-15-2019 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899300)
Imagine, after everything that's been revealed, he still would have sold that bad PSA 2 T3 Cobb with a buried and bullshit addendum. For me, along with telling me that Gary had essentially retired, a defining moment.

You are preaching to the choir. Much as it hurts me, 100% agree. :) Complete bullshit and pretty much a character reveal, as if one was needed.

Johnny630 07-16-2019 05:48 AM

Am I the only one who thinks PWCC's business will be legally fine?

Sure a Black Eye buy Guys Who Collect but I don't see a slow down in their volume of consigned cards coming to auction.... looks to be fine to me.... every auction is loaded surely they all can't be bad.

Rhotchkiss 07-16-2019 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899300)
Imagine, after everything that's been revealed, he still would have sold that bad PSA 2 T3 Cobb with a buried and bullshit addendum. For me, along with telling me that Gary had essentially retired, a defining moment.

That was the nail in the coffin for me.

Bugsy 07-16-2019 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedsFan1941 (Post 1899227)
I do not know what is more puzzling. That people on this board continue to do business with pwcc or that they post about it like it’s nothing. congrats to everyone on their pwcc pickups. I hope every card is not what it was represented to be.

That is exactly how I feel. Everyone is outraged about cards being doctored, but even people posting in these threads continue to support PWCC.

Fuddjcal 07-16-2019 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vintageclout (Post 1899066)
Soft? I Don’t think so....

SGC 4.5 Green Cobb - $15K
PSA 4.5 Cobb Bat Off - $6K
PSA 4.5 Red Cobb - $5.8K
SGC 5 #144 Goudey Ruth - $10.6K
PSA 5 Brunner’s Young - Nearly $6K
PSA 4 M116 Wagner - $4.7K
PSA 5 T206 Speaker - Nearly $4K
PSA 5 US Caramel Gehrig - $6.1K

Just a few examples of strong pricing.

Just a few examples of fakes

Peter_Spaeth 07-16-2019 08:13 AM

If indeed PWCC has stopped taking Gary's cards, I wonder who he has found?

Leon 07-16-2019 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1899369)
If indeed PWCC has stopped taking Gary's cards, I wonder who he has found?

Investors

Peter_Spaeth 07-16-2019 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1899371)
Investors

Yeah he could set up a website and just sell direct. Or sell on ebay, or Facebook.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 AM.