Love them all! Always a great job! I think the only thing, that kinda bothers me and this is really small but, I would of changed the color for your signature on the Cy Young.It doesn't stand out, like your others. Like I said, it doesn't take away from your masterpiece. The eyes are stunning on the Cy Young! Favorite one in the new bunch!
|
Thanks a lot for the kind words, everybody.
Regarding the signature in the Young painting, it's a good call. I think in this case, for whatever reason, the signature really disappears in the scan, though in the original, I'm pretty sure it's brighter. I'll have to double-check once I see it again. But thanks for noticing!! Oh, and also, Dean (the ol' agent) is starting to go through his contact list of those interested in my work, as he'll be sending out periodical updates in the very near future. So, if any of you want to be kept in the loop regarding news, prices and/or deals on my artwork, feel free to send me a private message with your email address. Of course, your info will NEVER be sold, rented or traded. Thanks again, Graig |
Dude,
That Young is crazy good. The whole face is so realistic it's incredible. Congrats on more great work. Any updates on the 27 Yankees? Best, Mark Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk |
Wow Greg
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
It shows that you enjoyed painting the Young portait. Very well done though I'm not sure I'd want that rough mug hanging in my den. Hard to believe he was just 41 or 42 at that time and still pitching some decent ball.
Since the signature die has already been cast I'll pick a nit as well. I actually prefer an obscured signature or even none at all. If attribution is necessary I'd rather it be on the back of the work. That being said you do have one of the nicest signatures I've ever seen and I do not find it obtrusive. |
Graig,
Thanks for continuing to share your work here! It's always great to see what you're working on. |
Hey all,
Thanks so much for all of the comments from my last post, especially the critique of the signature and everything. I really appreciate that honesty. You might have to exhibit some more of that for these next two paintings, which I got scans of today: http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...ps8056c173.jpg Dorothy Kamenshek, 14" x 18" http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...ps3020e945.jpg Rube Waddell, 1901, 16" x 20" Yeah, they're a little different from what I've done before in terms of subject matter, but that matters not. Kamenshek might not have been the most attractive of women, but she was still perhaps the greatest player ever in the AAGPBL. It's actually not one of Dean's favorites, though I like it a lot. And it was an honor to paint her. Rube is...well...Rube. I enjoyed painting this one too, especially with that bad@$$ double-breasted suit. It's amazing to see how clean-cut he was here, yet I can't even imagine the kind of craziness that must have been going on in his mind. I think the eyes have it. So, I'd love to hear your thoughts on any of these, be they good or bad. Or even unrelated. Thanks for all of the constant support, everybody. Graig |
Quote:
I absolutely LOVE the Rube Waddell. I think you captured him perfectly, FWIW... |
I agree w/Scott, you really nailed Rube there. He looks like his mother forced him to comb his hair and wear his father's suit for that portrait.
|
That Rube is absolutely fantastic.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:08 AM. |