View Full Version : Leaf Newhouser
Archive
01-28-2009, 03:42 PM
Posted By: <b>Bobby Binder</b><p>Looks like that Leaf of Newhouser that came out here last summer is doing very well so far.<br><br><a href="http://www.hugginsandscott.com/cgi-bin/showitem.pl?itemid=10523" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.hugginsandscott.com/cgi-bin/showitem.pl?itemid=10523</a>
Archive
01-28-2009, 03:59 PM
Posted By: <b>Dave Hornish</b><p>Zounds!
Archive
01-28-2009, 04:16 PM
Posted By: <b>boxingcardman</b><p>And it's all because of you pesky kids!<br><br>Sic Gorgiamus Allos Subjectatos Nunc
Archive
01-29-2009, 11:32 AM
Posted By: <b>dan mckee</b><p>They are expecting a lot more out of that card, I guessed $10K total but looks like I will be wrong. It is a great addition to a full set but not at that price. What does this make the 1933 Goudey #106 that isn't Lajoie worth? I can't remember the player on it but I think Jonathon F. owned it. Dan.
Archive
01-29-2009, 12:18 PM
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Dan- I think it was Leo Durocher.
Archive
01-29-2009, 01:34 PM
Posted By: <b>CoreyRSh.anus</b><p>I guess I missed this one. Are you saying there was a 1933 Goudey #106 issued in 1933 of Leo Durocher? Is the front/verso different than on his #147 card? How many #106 Durochers are known to exist?<br><br>
Archive
01-29-2009, 01:38 PM
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>The #106 Durocher was in the Halper sale. I think it was unique.
Archive
01-29-2009, 01:52 PM
Posted By: <b>Paul</b><p>The 106 Durocher is believed to be from an early test print before all the cards were finalized. There are several other misnumbered cards as well. Conspiracy theorists argue that ol' Jeff Burdick and his buddies got a hold of the original goudey printing plates and had a little fun with them by producing cards like #106 Durocher. I don't buy it.
Archive
01-29-2009, 06:15 PM
Posted By: <b>dan mckee</b><p>That is it! Durocher and I think it is legit, not some printing garbage. If this Leaf brings $50K that Durocher is worth $150K, Dan
Archive
01-30-2009, 05:05 AM
Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>George Moll, the hobby pioneer responsible for all the Bowman and Play Ball cards, showed me<br> his 1933 Goudey Durocher (#106).<br><br>I was fortunate to visit George back in 1981. George showed me a tremendous amount of stuff,<br> from when he collected Goudey's to when his Adv. and Art Agency produced the Bowman Gum<br> cards from 1937 to 1955 (uncut sheets of Play Ball's and Bowman's to the original artwork for<br> the Horrors of War cards).<br><br>Among all these "goodies" he showed me his 1933 Goudey's, and occupying the slot in his album<br> for card #106 was this Durocher.<br><br>However, I vaguely recall his answer to me as to where this card came from. I think he said that<br> his Agency printed it back in the late 1930's when they started printing the cards for GUM, INC. ?<br><br><br>TED Z<br><br>
Archive
02-04-2009, 06:32 PM
Posted By: <b>Marc S.</b><p>with time to go on that Leaf Newhouser...
Archive
02-04-2009, 09:35 PM
Posted By: <b>Paul</b><p>It sold for $80,000. How many post-war cards have sold for more? How many that weren't graded 8 or above? <br><br>And how many cards, pre-war or post-war, sell for 80K in poor condition. Granted, this card was in damn nice shape for a technical "poor," but still. Pretty amazing price.
Archive
02-04-2009, 10:39 PM
Posted By: <b>Rhys</b><p>I am not a postwar collector so I am biased, but I could think of 8 $10,000 cards I would rather have than that card. It makes Larry Fritch's US Caramel Lindstroms look like a bargain at $120,000. To each his own.
Archive
02-05-2009, 05:10 AM
Posted By: <b>Jeff Lichtman</b><p>Rhys, I agree. Nice card....but 80K? Insane.