Mastro Legends Auction Ended [Archive] - Net54baseball.com Forums

View Full Version : Mastro Legends Auction Ended

Archive

12-09-2008, 06:10 AM

Posted By: Tony NMastro's Legends auction ended last night, and some of the lots went really low in my opinion. I understand the economy has to be factored in, but I thought the Tip Top, Brunners Bread, and PSA 8 Mantle were steals. Some highlights with the juice: E107 Matty - $120,000 PSA 8 Mantle 52 Topps - $78,000 D322 Tip Top Set - $48,000 M110 Sporting Life Set - $78,000 D304 Brunners Bread Set - $48,000 Tony

Archive

12-09-2008, 06:54 AM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanTony, your conclusion that these prices were steals is based upon looking at the prices some of these cards and sets have received in the past couple years in other auctions -- which reflect that the values had really taken off during this period. Problem is, I don't believe that many of the previoulsy-reported prices are real (and I know this with certainty in some cases). So, I can't say that the prices of some of these lots received last night were actually "steals"; they may in fact simply be the appropriate prices without any fraud factored in. That the sad recipient of weak auction prices is Mastro, of course, is hilariously ironic.

Archive

12-09-2008, 07:07 AM

Posted By: barrysloateThe prices the D304 and D322 went for yesterday seem about what they should be. On the other hand, the prices similar cards went for in the past made absolutely no sense to me.

Archive

12-09-2008, 07:13 AM

Posted By: Dan BrettaYou know with certainty Jeff? Are you privy to the FBI's investigation?

Archive

12-09-2008, 07:17 AM

Posted By: dan mckeeIs that the same Tip Top set that Mastro sold that was found in a Baltimore Row home? I thought that set brought $100K 1st time?

Archive

12-09-2008, 07:20 AM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanDan, why would I have to be privy to the FBI investigation to know with certainty that some previously reported price on card(s) were not what they were reported to be?

Archive

12-09-2008, 07:41 AM

Posted By: andy beckerwhat grade was the d304 set?

Archive

12-09-2008, 07:46 AM

Posted By: barrysloateThe Cobb and Wagner were both SGC 40, and the balance ranged from EX-MT to Poor, with most cards Very Good.

Archive

12-09-2008, 08:00 AM

Posted By: andy beckerthanks barry

Archive

12-09-2008, 08:38 AM

Posted By: randi just dont get the 52 mantle prices, when you can buy 33 goudey babe ruth cards in the same grade for much much less. the card is very liquid, not tough to find in any grade throughout the year.

Archive

12-09-2008, 08:41 AM

Posted By: leon"demand".....that explains the price of the '52 Mantle

Archive

12-09-2008, 09:27 AM

Posted By: Rich KleinEVERY hobby story about a collector asked them about 3 cards T206 Wagner 1933 (34) Goudey Lajoie 1952 Topps Mantle Those 3 cards have been for years the "holy trinity" of cards. If you think some card(s) have replaced any of those 3 -- let's hear your opinion and why? Rich

Archive

12-09-2008, 09:33 AM

Posted By: davidcyclebackRich is correct. Many, many collectors will tell you that the 52T Mantle is the card they most aspire to own. The Mantle is second most famous baseball card after the Wagner, and is legitimately significant as the key card from Topps first full length baseball card set. I prefer Mantle's 51 Bowman, but that's just one vote.

Archive

12-09-2008, 09:36 AM

Posted By: BobA lot of card collectors in their 50's and 60's worshipped the Mick and there are a slew of us out there. In 30 years I think his card prices would plummet when we start dying off <img src="/images/sad.gif" height="14" width="14" alt="sad.gif"> as opposed to Ruth's which should always be strong.

Archive

12-09-2008, 09:39 AM

Posted By: Dan BrettaJeff, saying you know something with certainty presumes you have insider knowledge of what's going on with the FBI investigation...I was merely asking if you do.

Archive

12-09-2008, 09:41 AM

Posted By: Dan BrettaBob, my 7 year old's favorite player for a while there was Mickey Mantle...I let him watch 61* and he watched that movie over and over.

Archive

12-09-2008, 09:45 AM

Posted By: Anthony S.Bob, Potential advances in cryonics should keep the Mantle market strong.

Archive

12-09-2008, 09:46 AM

Posted By: barrysloate61* is right at the top of my favorite baseball films of all-time. I was especially impressed with how Barry Pepper and Thomas Jane so resemble Roger and Mickey.

Archive

12-09-2008, 09:48 AM

Posted By: leonI thought the prices realized were exactly in line with what I thought going into this auction. I only looked at the few cards, and card groups, I have knowledge of though. regards

Archive

12-09-2008, 09:58 AM

Posted By: davidcyclebackDon't discount the possibility of a holomickey. Holograms can get drunk (as can mechanoids, of course), but can't sign autographs. <img src="http://www.cyberpursuits.com/heckifiknow/rd/images/rd08.jpg" alt="[linked image]">

Archive

12-09-2008, 10:01 AM

Posted By: Jeff PriznerJust curious exactly which reported card prices turned out to be fake? Doesn't surprise me at all, just wondering which lots you were referring to in particular.

Archive

12-09-2008, 10:04 AM

Posted By: Jeff Lichtman"Jeff, saying you know something with certainty presumes you have insider knowledge of what's going on with the FBI investigation...I was merely asking if you do." Dan, I'm not sure what they're putting in the water in Nebraska but I would suggest bottled water going forward! I said I had certainty that the listed sales of a card or cards is not what it has been reported to be. How that translates into my having "insider knowledge" of the FBI investigation is one hell of a leap -- especially since last time I checked I'm not employed by the FBI or privy to the full scope of their investigations. In addition, as a defense lawyer I would never suggest that whatever the FBI collects in an investigation is information that is 100% certain. Edited to add: to clarify a bit, I wouldn't claim that I have knowledge with 'certainty' about any fact unless I learned it firsthand. Speaking to people who witnessed something would hardly qualify for 'certain' knowledge.

Archive

12-09-2008, 10:37 AM

Posted By: Dan BrettaThe allegations against Mastro are for shill bidding...you said "Problem is, I don't believe that many of the previoulsy-reported prices are real (and I know this with certainty in some cases)."....I took that to mean you have knowledge that the rest of us don't about the shilling charges. That's why I asked if you were privy to the FBI's investigation. It's that simple...if I misunderstood you (Which I apparently did) then I'm sorry.

Archive

12-09-2008, 11:03 AM

Posted By: DarrenSloate, I agree. Billy Crystal did a great job producing 61*. Casting was excellent. It is atop my movie lists.

Archive

12-09-2008, 11:45 AM

Posted By: Dan Bretta61* is a great film however some things bother me about it...Such as Bob Cerv being shown as a Yankee at the start of 1961 (He began the year with the Angels). Cerv used to live just down the street from me and I know his grandkids and they say he was not happy with how he was portrayed...sort of as a big, dumb oaf when in fact he was a college graduate and had been a teacher at different times.

Archive

12-09-2008, 11:45 AM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanDan, no problem. And who knows for certain other than the government what they are investigating regarding Mastro?

Archive

12-09-2008, 11:55 AM

Posted By: barrysloateCerv was a bit of a goofy character in the movie...but of course I have no idea what he was actually like.

Archive

12-09-2008, 12:24 PM

Posted By: Joe D.Dan.... I consulted the most wise oracle I know and was given this answer... <img src="http://blueroof.files.wordpress.com/2007/02/magic-8-ball.png" alt="[linked image]"> I can shake it and ask again? <img src="/images/happy.gif" height="14" width="14" alt="happy.gif">

Archive

12-09-2008, 01:26 PM

Posted By: D. BerginOk, apparently I haven't bid in a Mastro auction in awhile. I don't like to sound like a cheapskate but anybody else bothered by the $75 registration fee for the privilege of bidding in their auctions?

Archive

12-09-2008, 01:48 PM

Posted By: leonCall their customer service....Just mention Net54 Vintage Baseball Card Forum and your registration will be free. All members in good standing can register for free. LMK if there is an issue and I will help out.....take care

Archive

12-09-2008, 01:55 PM

Posted By: D. BerginGreat Leon. Thanks!!!!

Archive

12-09-2008, 02:14 PM

Posted By: Rob D.And be sure to mention Lichtman's name when you call. On second thought, scratch that. Best double-play combo ever? E-mail for scans and Bump for price reduction

Archive

12-09-2008, 04:33 PM

Posted By: dan mckeeI love magic 8 ball Joe!

Archive

12-09-2008, 04:37 PM

Posted By: Jim VB"And be sure to mention Lichtman's name when you call." Sure. Because that gets you the $150 registration special (and no pesky catalog in the mail.)

Archive

12-09-2008, 05:04 PM

Posted By: leonIt's the tape...remember....the tape. Lichtman pays $75 registration and $75 for investigation-proof tape.....

Archive

12-09-2008, 06:33 PM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanHey, I love paying that $75 registration fee which gives me the opportunity to get defrauded! Check out this great card that was on ebay tonight, a 1916 Herpolshemier's Cobb sold by Mile High: <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&it em=190270939971" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&it em=190270939971</a> Last time the card was sold at auction? October 1 -- in a Mile High auction! <a href="http://www.milehighcardco.com/LotDetail2.aspx?lotid=11390" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.milehighcardco.com/LotDetail2.aspx?lotid=11390</a>

Archive

12-09-2008, 06:39 PM

Posted By: peter ullmanI used to own that cobb...they re-holdered it! <img src="http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i176/ullmandds/cobbsfront-1.jpg" alt="[linked image]">

Archive

12-09-2008, 06:44 PM

Posted By: Jim VBWell, this would seem to rebut any argument that the "big" auction houses command substantially higher prices.

Archive

12-10-2008, 04:12 AM

Posted By: barrysloatePeter- that's the one you consigned to me, and we got $1988 for it. So the winner consigned it to Mile High, and now the "second time" it was sold it went for $38 more. Nothing like rolling over those profits.

Archive

12-10-2008, 05:20 AM

Posted By: MattJeff - nice detective work! Is what they did illegal?

Archive

12-10-2008, 05:21 AM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanI guess the winner of the card from Mile High in October was so impressed with Mile High's marketing in that auction that he immediately turned around and allowed Mile High to re-sell it on ebay. And lucky for that winner that a real, recent value was entered into VCP to guide all bidders last night as to the card's true value. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Archive

12-10-2008, 06:14 AM

Posted By: Matt<img src="/images/happy.gif" height="14" width="14" alt="happy.gif">OK, let me re-phrase: Is it illegal for an auction house to say something has sold when in fact it was a house account that was the high bid? Edited to add: I assume this would be some kind of fraud, but then again, I also would have guessed that it would be illegal to bid from a house account without disclosing that fact to bidders.

Archive

12-10-2008, 07:35 AM

Posted By: Tom Boblittthe Mile High winner renegged and Brian stuck it on ebay just to get rid of it. Who knows.......

Archive

12-10-2008, 09:04 AM

Posted By: boxingcardmanThis is perhaps not the best case to shout "fraud" on: 1. State law dictates what auctioneers can do and how auctions can be run. Many states allow reserves of various formats (including in some cases hidden reserves) to be placed on lots. Depending on Colorado law and on the auction rules stated, that could have been what happened and might have been legal. The Ebay sale could have resulted from a failure to reach a hidden reserve or a house account bid to create a reserve. The consignor also might have decided to let MHCC take a shot at Ebay at a reduced price. 2. Apparently, there was a real sale of this exact card at $38 less than the auction price the month before the auction, so I don't see a buyer taken advantage of here w/r/t price manipulation. If anything, the flipper (whoever it was) is the one who got hosed after paying consignment and/or Ebay fees. 3. Setting aside the legality and ethics of the situation to focus on theory, a house account purchaser could do quite well flipping cards from auction to Ebay, depending on the deal it made with the consignor. If you figure that anywhere up to 40% of the total on the sale (including vig) goes to the house anyhow for an auction, the opportunity is there to pick up cards at a substantial dealer advantage. You could selectively bid on lots that you would like to own secure that the outcome would either be your company owning the lot at a discount or your company making money on the bidding. Whether a subsequent Ebay sale made money or not enough to make up for the listing, final value and paypal fees would depend on the deal the auctioneer had with the consignor and the auctioneer's skill in selecting which lots to chase. A side bonus would be the creation of "verifiable" transactions for VCP to report on to give the next bidders comfort that they are in the ballpark for the card. Again, not saying it's right, just pretty smart. Sic Gorgiamus Allos Subjectatos Nunc

Archive

12-10-2008, 09:12 AM

Posted By: dan mckeeYea, what Adam said.

Archive

12-10-2008, 09:57 AM

Posted By: Matt"Setting aside the legality and ethics of the situation to focus on theory..." Is such a "business plan" legal in certain states? That is something...not sure if smart is the word for it.