View Full Version : Did they just pick up the description from another auction?
Archive
12-03-2008, 06:24 AM
Posted By: <b>Ed McCollum</b><p>Hope this doesn't count as "outing a current auction" but<br><br>look at the condition of the card, then the description.<br><br><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6gvxpp" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6gvxpp</a><br><br>I would hope they just picked up the description from a previous auction, and forgot to change it. Otherwise, I sold about 200 pristine, gem mint t206s the last couple of years for PR/FR prices....
Archive
12-03-2008, 06:29 AM
Posted By: <b>Steve F</b><p>Thanks for the laff <img src="/images/happy.gif" height="14" width="14" alt="happy.gif">
Archive
12-03-2008, 06:40 AM
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>"card is in a least NM or better"<br><br>I am not sure I need more scans as they offered.....Hey, it supposedly doesn't have paper loss (we can't see the back)!!
Archive
12-03-2008, 06:55 AM
Posted By: <b>john/z28jd</b><p> According to this seller NM stands for noticeably mangled and I think that's a very accurate grade,you cant get on him for that!<br><br><br> Time for a short story that just reminded me of. A guy bought some 1969 Cubs commons of me a while back and I described them in my listing as overall GOOD condition with some VG. When the auction ended much higher(I figured it would go for $5 it was about $15) than I thought so I threw in a low grade Ron Santo card as well without telling him. When he got the cards he wrote me back saying none of the cards were in good shape,some had creases,all had corner wear,one had a pen mark on the back and he specifically pointed out what was wrong with the Santo card. I ended up taking the cards back because he couldn't understand what the grade GOOD meant