PDA

View Full Version : 3 T200 at small auction


Archive
09-02-2008, 04:21 PM
Posted By: <b>jge15</b><p>Anybody notice the T200's [Phili Clev Wash[ on Proxibid at music city auction also some early spalding sports equipment How hard would it be to put together a top graded T200 set<br>thanks Jon

Archive
09-02-2008, 06:50 PM
Posted By: <b>Craig W</b><p>Hi Jon,<br /><br />I'm not an expert on T200's but I'm very, very slowly working on a PSA 3 set. In eBay open auctions, common teams of that grade will run you about $250 ea. You can double that for Clev & NY Amer. T200s are fairly obtainable thru eBay up to PSA 4 / SGC 50, but rarely do I see any of what I'd consider High Grade (PSA 7 and above).<br /><br />I know it's not much, but hope it helps you out.<br /><br />Best Regards,<br />Craig<br />

Archive
09-02-2008, 08:59 PM
Posted By: <b>bruce Dorskind</b><p><br /><br />The reason you rarely see a T 200 in PSA 7 or above is that only 1% of 707 T200 cards<br />that have been graded by PSA grade 7 or above<br /><br />In fact, 7 cards grade 7 and there is a single 8. Most of these cards are in one collection.<br /><br />Only 15 cards have graded 6<br /><br />SGC's grading has been even tougher. Only 10 of the 857 cards graded by SGC have achieved<br />a grade of 80 or above. There have been 5 80s 4 84s and a single 88<br /><br />Ultra high grade T 200's are rare indeed- and will not likely ever find their way onto E Bay<br /><br /><br />Bruce Dorskind<br />America's Toughest Want List

Archive
09-02-2008, 09:03 PM
Posted By: <b>Griffins</b><p>Agreed with Bruce. Top graded T200's are very, very difficult. And you'll have to duke it out with at least 3 different collectors.<br /> Besides condition issues, there are tiers of scarcity.<br />NY AL and both St Louis teams are tough, Boston NL is a killer. About half the set is easy (in lower mid grade), and then it gets increasingly tougher.<br /> Great set though, and when there aren't major cracking issues and the images are sharp can be really beautiful.

Archive
09-03-2008, 05:14 AM
Posted By: <b>jge15</b><p>Thanks for the response I might try to put a mid grade set together

Archive
09-03-2008, 06:32 AM
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Even putting together a VG-EX set will prove a challenge.<br /><br />The combination of thin paper stock and a glossy surface make these very susceptible to cracking and creasing. I would focus more on getting them all with strong photos, and worry less about the numerical grade.

Archive
09-03-2008, 06:43 AM
Posted By: <b>Tim</b><p>Can someone with more knowledge than myself about this issue explain the big differences in price from one team to another and why some teams are more scarce than others?<br /><br />I finally picked up the Boston National team card last month thanks to a board member, but when it came to price I almost wish I was a fan of another team. j/k

Archive
09-03-2008, 08:07 AM
Posted By: <b>boxingcardman</b><p>Pittsburg: Wagner on a T card<br /><br />Cleveland: Shoeless Joe Jackson on a T card<br /><br />Giants: Jim Thorpe on a T card.<br /><br /><br><br>Sic Gorgiamus Allos Subjectatos Nunc

Archive
09-03-2008, 08:16 AM
Posted By: <b>Jason L</b><p>I could not have said it more succinctly.<br /><br />Those are the exact reasons that I own only those 3 cards in the set, in addition to my Cubbies.<br /><br />But also, with the NY Giants card, you get some of the most storied characters of the era...that card has ridiculous firepower.<br />McGraw<br />Mathewson<br />Thorpe<br />Snodgrass<br />Doyle<br />Marquad<br />Merkle<br />Meyers<br /><br />the only one missing is the crazy pitcher whose name is escaping me for some reason...<br />

Archive
09-03-2008, 08:46 AM
Posted By: <b>Aaron Patton</b><p><br />...Bugs Raymond

Archive
09-03-2008, 09:34 AM
Posted By: <b>Tim</b><p>I understand that some of the price differences are due to the players pictured on the cards, but is there a scarcity issue that drives the prices of some of the teams?

Archive
09-03-2008, 09:41 AM
Posted By: <b>Anthony N.</b><p>I think so.<br />According to Lipset, Phil AL, Boston AL, NY NL, Brooklyn, Cleveland and Cincinnati are "unusually common"<br />Cubs, WhiteSox are "moderately more difficult". He rates NY AL and both St. Louis teams, along with Boston AL as more difficult, with NY NL and St Louis AL the toughest. I'd disagree on this last part, as I feel Boston NL is the toughest card in the set, with NY AL and the Browns a bit easier, and the Cards a bit easier still.<br />I've never seen a reason for any of this.<br /><br /><br />edited to fix typo.<br /><br />

Archive
09-03-2008, 09:57 AM
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>Combined SGC+PSA Populations:<br /><br />BOSTON AMERICANS130<br />BOSTON NATIONALS35<br />BROOKLYN NATIONALS90<br />CHICAGO AMERICANS96<br />CHICAGO NATIONALS79<br />CINCINNATI NATIONALS104<br />CLEVELAND AMERICANS154<br />DETROIT AMERICANS71<br />NEW YORK AMERICANS50<br />NEW YORK NATIONALS131<br />PHIL. AMERICANS141<br />PHIL. NATIONALS129<br />PITT. NATIONALS122<br />ST. LOUIS AMERICANS50<br />ST. LOUIS NATIONALS61<br />WASH. AMERICANS112

Archive
09-03-2008, 10:02 AM
Posted By: <b>Tim</b><p>Thanks for that information Matt. It's telling of why the Boston National is so high. I would love to hear some thoughts on why there is such a difference in the numbers.

Archive
09-03-2008, 10:25 AM
Posted By: <b>Joe D.</b><p>Tim,<br /><br />The lowest population cards were the crappiest teams.<br /><br />Either fewer cards were produced, fewer cards were purchased, or fewer cards were saved of those teams.<br />Or all of the above.<br /><br /><br />Boston Nationals is the toughest - so nice going in picking that one up.<br /><br /><br />I posted earlier.... but my post didn't take.....<br />Jon -<br />go for the set.<br /><br />Incredible photos, full of great players and hofers.....<br /><br />it is definitely my favorite T set.<br /><br /><br />

Archive
09-03-2008, 10:35 AM
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>Joe - interesting suggestion. Here are the 1912 standings:<br /><br />AL Team W L WL% GB<br />BostonRS BOS 105 47 .691 -- <br />Washngtn WSH 91 61 .599 14.0<br />Phildlpa PHA 90 62 .592 15.0<br />ChicagoW CHW 78 76 .506 28.0<br />Clvlnd CLE 75 78 .490 30.5<br />Detroit DET 69 84 .451 36.5<br />St.Louis SLB 53 101 .344 53.0<br />NewYorkH NYY 50 102 .329 55.0<br /><br />NL Team W L WL% GB<br />NewYorkG NYG 103 48 .682 -- <br />Pittsbgh PIT 93 58 .616 10.0<br />ChicagoC CHC 91 59 .607 11.5<br />Cincnnti CIN 75 78 .490 29.0<br />Phildlpa PHI 73 79 .480 30.5<br />St.Louis STL 63 90 .412 41.0<br />Brooklyn BRO 58 95 .379 46.0<br />BostonBr BSN 52 101 .340 52.0