PDA

View Full Version : Favorite 19th Century Catcher - Real Men . . .


Archive
01-21-2008, 06:29 PM
Posted By: <b>Joe_G.</b><p>My favorite catcher of all time, 19th century or otherwise, would be <b>Charlie Bennett</b>. Considered the best by many of his contemporaries, Charlie regularly led the league in fielding percentage. <br /><br /><CENTER><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1200881595.JPG"></CENTER><br /><br /><CENTER><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1200881534.JPG"></CENTER><br /><br />Other than the Tomlinson portrait, I don't believe I've posted these images in the past. I would like to thank Bob Richardson, Bruce Babcock, and eBay (Brian Deer) for bringing these cabinets together. The batting Tomlinson being my most recent pick-up.<br /><br />It would take volumes to relate all the interesting Charlie Bennett stories, but here is one account I'd like to share as published in the New York Times during the 1887 World Championship (w.r.t. Charlie behind the plate):<br /><br /><i>"When he held up that battered right hand, with its fingers swollen and spread like a boxing glove, with rags tied around three of them, and a general appearance of having been run over by a freight-car about the entire hand, it did not seem as though there was room to split it in any new place. He went right on with his play . . . though the blood was reddening his hand and could be seen now and then to drip from his fingers. Bennett wears a look of patient suffering on his bronzed features. His hands have suffered so much that they have probably become case-hardened and cease to feel . . ."</i><br /><br /><CENTER><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1200881615.JPG"></CENTER><br /><br />Here's a close-up of his Tomlinson Batting pose that shows his battered hands, hardly able to grip the bat. Consider that the photo dates to just before the start of the 1886 season, about half way through his career. His offensive dominance suffered as the injuries took their toll, but his defensive greatness remained.<br /><br />Bennett's playing days would tragically end after the 1893 season concluded when he lost both legs in a train accident. He would then move back to Detroit where he was still extremely popular. A new ball park was built at the corner of Michigan & Trumbull in 1896 for the new Detroit Tiger team (Ban Johnson's Western League which turned American League 1901). The park was named "Bennett Park" in Bennett's honor. Charlie would catch the cerimonial first pitch that season, a tradition that would continue every year until 1927 due to Charlie's passing.<br /><br />Feel free to comment and share scans of your favorite catcher, Charlie Bennett or otherwise.<br /><br />Best Regards,<br />Joe Gonsowski

Archive
01-21-2008, 06:45 PM
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>My favorite 19th Century catcher. Belongs in the Hall of Fame!!<br /><br /><img src="http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g5/jacklitsch1/19th%20Century/13.jpg"><br /><img src="http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g5/jacklitsch1/19th%20Century/14.jpg"><br /><img src="http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g5/jacklitsch1/19th%20Century/16.jpg"><br /><br />Played For<br />Toledo Blue Stockings, American Association (1884)<br />Detroit Wolverines (1885)<br />Philadelphia Phillies (1886-1888)<br />Detroit Wolverines (1888)<br />Cleveland Spiders, American Association (1888)<br />Rochester Broncos, American Association (1890)<br />Washington Senators, American Association (1891)<br />Washington Senators (1892-1899)<br />Brooklyn Dodgers (1899-1901)<br />Detroit Tigers (1902-1903)<br />New York Yankees (1904-1907)<br />Boston Red Sox (1907-1908)<br />Cleveland Indians (1908-1910)<br />Detroit Tigers (1912)<br /><br /><br /><br />Managed<br />Washington Senators (1898)<br />Boston Red Sox (1907-1908)<br />Cleveland Indians (1909-1911)<br />

Archive
01-21-2008, 06:53 PM
Posted By: <b>john/z28jd</b><p> Great scans Joe. I think Bennett is hall of fame worthy based on how great he was defensively at an incredibly difficult position. Just check these stats of Bennett vs Ewing who not only is the only 19th century catcher in the hall of fame, but he was considered by some as the greatest player of his generation,especially defensively. They played in the same era, Ewing caught just 636 games which is a high total for catchers still,but it shows that he had time off in between catching assignments which gave his hands time to heal. He had 360 passed balls and a .931 fielding % which was well over the avg at that time. Bennett on the other hand played played 954 games behind the plate but committed just 352 passed balls,8 less in 318 more games. He also had a fielding % of .942 in that same era.<br /><br /><br /> He obviously wasnt as good offensively as Ewing but he did have 3 seasons over .300 hitting and like Joe said,his average was hurt by the fact he could barely grip a bat near the end of his career which resulted in some poor offensive season but he was still dominant defensively at a position most of us wouldnt last an inning at under 19th century conditions,especially considering he started in 1878 when gloves were more like just hands. If Ewing is an obvious first ballot hall of famer, its hard to believe a guy who matched him defensively while playing 50% more games than he did,isnt even considered.