Big Borders. [Archive] - Net54baseball.com Forums

View Full Version : Big Borders.

Archive

11-21-2007, 03:31 PM

Posted By: Martin NealWho Likes Big Borders? Seriously, I found these two in a large lot recently. These two were well over an inch and a half in width. Does anyone have an idea how large the borders can actually get? <img src="http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e268/123MARTINS/hugeborders.jpg"> <img src="http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e268/123MARTINS/doughertyfat-1.jpg">

Archive

11-21-2007, 03:53 PM

Posted By: Jeff Lichtman<img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1195602796.JPG">

Archive

11-21-2007, 03:57 PM

Posted By: Mattbeautiful card Jeff!

Archive

11-21-2007, 04:14 PM

Posted By: Brian Weisner <img src="http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q257/hogan6g/17061376.jpg">

Archive

11-21-2007, 04:16 PM

Posted By: Brian Weisner Hi Martin, I love big borders........ <img src="http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q257/hogan6g/Scan0025-1.jpg"> No Jeff... I don't have a Chase....

Archive

11-21-2007, 04:19 PM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanBrian, I nearly laughed out loud at what you just wrote. As I'm scrolling down your cards...I'm thinking "damn, wonder if he has a Chase with borders like that."

Archive

11-21-2007, 04:28 PM

Posted By: Brian Weisner Hi Jeff, Even though you are a Dookie..... I would still sell you a Chase if I had one....... Be well Brian PS I might have a few Chase's with Rare backs that I might part with later. PS 2 Your Guys look good with Singer in the middle, but they are a bit young. Either way we should have fun in the ACC this year. LMK if you make it to NC for any games and the first 3-4 rounds are on me....

Archive

11-21-2007, 04:34 PM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanBrian, thanks, much appreciated. I think the team will be better this year than last's but still not very good. No size and a slow PG does not help. Btw, is Tyler ever going to graduate? He's like 30, right? Seriously, this year they will be very, very tough.

Archive

11-21-2007, 04:36 PM

Posted By: Martin NealThose cards are obscene. Brian, I had forgotten that you collect large bordered T206s. They're so... larger than life. <img src="http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e268/123MARTINS/biggborders.jpg"> By the way, I just looked at Carolina's schedule this afternoon, It looks to me that they have a good chance of going undefeated. Go Heels!

Archive

11-21-2007, 04:50 PM

Posted By: Brian Weisner Hi Martin, Nice big borders.... But you didn't look hard enough at the Heels Schedule... They play an easy one tonight, but then: Nov. 23, 2007 Old Dominion1 11:55 pm ET Nov 25, 2007 Louisville ???? Most likely Nov. 28, 2007 at Ohio State 9:00 pm ET Dec. 1, 2007 at Kentucky 2:00 pm ET Dec. 4, 2007 at Pennsylvania That looks more like an NCAA tournament schedule than real life... A game every 3 days, 2 sometimes? Plus, you can't go through the ACC undefeated anymore..... Hi Jeff, Be happy you have Davidson at Duke.... and you have 6-7 very solid players, that impress me a lot more than the last 5 years. Here are a couple of more graded Big B's.... <img src="http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q257/hogan6g/Scan0027-1.jpg"> <img src="http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q257/hogan6g/Scan0028.jpg"> PS I have about 50 more that are ungraded......

Archive

11-21-2007, 04:53 PM

Posted By: Rick McQuillanSo-if these were cut at the factory with wide borders, then there must be some real narrow cards around, so cards that measure less than the "normal" side should not always be judged as trimmed. Interesting. Rick

Archive

11-21-2007, 05:03 PM

Posted By: Anonymous<img src="http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a47/zouraspm/evers.jpg">

Archive

11-21-2007, 05:12 PM

Posted By: Brian Weisner Hi Rick, Wrong..... Most of the Big Borders cards came from three very different finds, where the card sizes differed from wayyyyy oversized to slightly undersized. I will put up some scans tomorrow when I have time, but quality control was not a big thing in 1909... Be well Brian PS I collect these cards and post these scans, so that the card doctors will never get there hands on these babies,,,

Archive

11-21-2007, 05:21 PM

Posted By: Rick McQuillanHi Brian, thanks for responding. My thinking is that if the T206's were cut from a sheet, if some were cut larger then some would have to be cut smaller. Did the size of the sheets vary? Rick

Archive

11-21-2007, 05:41 PM

Posted By: Brian Weisner Hi Rick, I think it was more to do with the quality control than anything else. Nobody cared in 1909 if the card in the pack was off center, miscut, or off color, they only cared about having a job. I think the majority of the cards were produced at the "acceptable size" while another 5-10% were produced larger or smaller. It doesn't take a grader or a rocket scientist to tell only someone who's handled a few hundred or thousand.. Be well Brian

Archive

11-21-2007, 05:57 PM

Posted By: Anthony S.It seems the vast majority of the large border T206s depicted in this thread are oversized at the top border. Could it be that uncut sheets had an extra large border above the cards at the very top of the sheet?

Archive

11-21-2007, 06:11 PM

Posted By: Brian Weisner Hi Anthony, It depends on the card. For instance Green background Cobb's tend to have more bottom border than top... I will post a few scans tomorrow. Be well Brian PS Good question.... As many of us have thought the same way.

Archive

11-21-2007, 07:26 PM

Posted By: J HullCool cards. I picked up these two several years apart, but they have many identical characteristics, and both are unusually wide T206s. I have reasons to think these came from a column of cards on the right-hand edge of the sheet. Also, certain cards are often seen with wider than average left and right borders. I can think of Crawford (Batting) and Young (Glove) off the top of my head. I suspect it has something to do with those cards' placement on the sheet as well. Jamie <img src="http://jimonym.com/Nattress.jpg">

Archive

11-21-2007, 07:42 PM

Posted By: JKBrian, For some reason I never realized there was another Tar Heel on the board. Do you make it to any games?

Archive

11-21-2007, 07:53 PM

Posted By: Steve DawsonIt seems the vast majority of the large border T206s depicted in this thread are oversized at the top border. Could it be that uncut sheets had an extra large border above the cards at the very top of the sheet? That's what I'm thinking. Since all the cards pictured on this thread have oversized TOP borders and regular sized BOTTOM borders, and since there's no hint of a player and team name at the top, then all these cards have to be from the top row on the sheet. Steve

Archive

11-21-2007, 08:10 PM

Posted By: leonbig borders are becoming rarer and rarer <img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14> <img src="http://luckeycards.com/pe92dockmanyoung.jpg"> <img src="http://luckeycards.com/pe105lajoie.jpg">

Archive

11-21-2007, 08:19 PM

Posted By: Scott M.Since Leon threw a caramel card into the mix... <img src="http://home.comcast.net/~phlflyer1/baseball/E98/E98_Green_Vaughn.JPG">

Archive

11-22-2007, 05:12 AM

Posted By: Brian Weisner Hi JK, Before I got married and had kids, I went to all of the games.... Now I go to 5-10 a year depending on how well they do in the Tournaments(ACC, NCAA). I have been to about 8 or 9 Final Fours and was lucky enough to be in New Orleans in 1982 and 1993 when we won.... Hated to miss 2005, but at least Mom was there.. Be well Brian PS I will try to post some big bottom and side border this afternoon. Here's a Cobb Bottom Border: <img src="http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q257/hogan6g/Scan0039.jpg">

Archive

11-22-2007, 10:12 AM

Posted By: DaveWHere's a link to an old post that lists the sizes of about 500 T206 cards, almost all Piedmonts. Larger than 1.5 in width seems rare (3 out of 500), but the norm is to be above the nominal width of 1 7/16. <a href="http://www.network54.com/Forum/153652/message/1090717955/last-1090718359/T206+sizes" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.network54.com/Forum/153652/message/1090717955/last-1090718359/T206+sizes</a>