1930 Ray-O-Print -Why'd these go so cheap? [Archive]

View Full Version : 1930 Ray-O-Print -Why'd these go so cheap?

Archive

11-09-2007, 07:21 PM

Posted By: Dan Bretta<a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270182806839" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270182806839</a> <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=270182807203" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=270182807203</a>

Archive

11-09-2007, 07:24 PM

Posted By: Al C.risafulliI think people shy away from them because it's possible to make modern prints of them. I don't know enough about them, but I've read that the Ruth and Gehrig are frequently reproduced, although I don't know how. But that's enough to get me to stay away. I'm sure others are in the same boat. Plus, MP & Co. produced much nicer-looking cards in 1943 than the Ray-O-Prints. -Al

Archive

11-09-2007, 07:26 PM

Posted By: MattMy understanding is that the Ray-O-Print was a kit which allowed you to make your own prints. If you have the kit, you could make as many as you wanted, so the prints are relatively worthless.

Archive

11-09-2007, 07:29 PM

Posted By: Al C.risafulliThat's right, that's what it was. Thanks. -Al

Archive

11-09-2007, 07:30 PM

Posted By: Dan BrettaDoes anyone slab these or do the grading companies stay away from them?

Archive

11-09-2007, 07:39 PM

Posted By: davidcyclebackIf you have a Ray O Print with the kit/envelope you're in good shape, in part as the kit itself is rare and valuable. While there are lots of Ray O Print reprints, reprinting doesn't appear to be an issue with most other self developing photo cards. So the collector doesn't have to be so worried with other issues.

Archive

11-09-2007, 07:45 PM

Posted By: MattDan - slab what - the prints? They are something you or I could make a thousand of on a whim. Or did you mean the kits?

Archive

11-09-2007, 07:59 PM

Posted By: Dan BrettaIt looks like a card to me...are the prints on photo paper or cardboard?

Archive

11-09-2007, 08:10 PM

Posted By: davidcyclebackThey're little photos, so they have to be on antique photo paper. I'd be automatically wary of Ray O Prints in extra high grade. 75 percent or so of the Ruth and Gehrig Ray O Prints are in very high grade, which probably means at least 75 percent or so are reprints. As they're old paper photos, if the paper is thin and there's some silvering in the image you can assume it's original. If it's on thick photo paper and Near Mint-Mint, it's probably a reprint.

Archive

11-09-2007, 08:19 PM

Posted By: KyleSome of the low end grading companies have graded them, like MINT or FGA. Junk. If anything, buy the negative, not the prints.

Archive

11-09-2007, 08:21 PM

Posted By: MattI would imagine, any grading company that grades cut pictures from the Spalding guide would grade one.

Archive

11-09-2007, 08:28 PM

Posted By: davidcyclebackThough scarce, you will find the complete kits for sale once in a while, including on eBay. Each kit is for one card, possibilities are Ruth, Gehrig, Dempsy, Lindbergh, Mary Pickford and Herbert Hoover. Comes in an envelope with clear text-- MP & Company manufacturer.

Archive

11-09-2007, 08:33 PM

Posted By: MattAnd I quote the esteemed David Cycleback: QUESTION: I have heard that some of the Ray O Prints Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig are reprints. Are you aware of this? ANSWER: I advise care, though not paranoia, when purchasing one of these items. The circa 1930 Ray O Prints were sold as little photographic kit that allowed a kid to make his or her own photograph of a famous American. The kid would receive a photographic negative and a snapshot sized piece of photographic paper. The resulting photo would be of a famous American. Subjects included Ruth and Gehrig, boxer Jack Dempsy, Herbert Hoover and Charles Lindbergh. The photos, which resemble blank backed trading cards, are check listed in the Standard Catalog of Baseball cards. The problem is that in modern times someone can take the original negative and make modern versions of the photos. All it takes is more photographic paper. It has long been rumored that many of the Ray of Prints on the market are modern versions. I have not seen a Ray O Print in person in several years, so am offering here nothing more than my impressions. I have seen an inordinate number of high grade Ray O Prints for sale— which, at least, raises an eyebrow. As someone who specializes in 20th century photographs, I can tell you that Mint Pre-WWII photographs are as common as hen’s teeth. I own thousands of photographs and not a single one is in Mint condition. The collector or dealer experienced with vintage photographs should not have difficulty distinguishing between vintage and modern versions. In particular, the vintage versions will often have distinct signs of aging (possibly including silvering to the image) that won’t appear on a modern version. A quick shine of a black light will identify many modern versions. The beginning collector’s best bet is to buy a Ray O Print when the original kit, including negative, comes with it. From a straight collecting standpoint, it would be neat to have the entire kit anyway.

Archive

11-09-2007, 08:37 PM

Posted By: davidcyclebackI have taken a blacklight to my photograph collection (sport and non-sport, wide variety of photo paper), and over 90 percent of the modern photo paper fluoresced brightly.

Archive

11-10-2007, 05:25 AM

Posted By: leonDon't forget...once made you need to dry them.... <img src="http://luckeycards.com/porayoprintstand.jpg">