View Full Version : Anyone seen/have a 1941 Play Ball variation like this?
Archive
10-22-2007, 12:26 PM
Posted By: <b>boxingcardman</b><p>I picked this up at the National. It has a Gumpert front and a Dimaggio back, upside down, indicating a flipped sheet. I've seen these with Leaf but not with Play Ball. <br /><br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1192991170.JPG"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1192991183.JPG">
Archive
10-22-2007, 12:28 PM
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>A dilemma for the grading company...
Archive
10-22-2007, 12:29 PM
Posted By: <b>Turner Engle</b><p>Man Adam, you have alot of cool freaks and geeks!<br /><br />
Archive
10-22-2007, 12:40 PM
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>I am not sure it was '41 it could have been '40 or even '39 but I have seen another Play Ball with a different player/back combo....very neat card. Thanks for sharing....
Archive
10-22-2007, 01:35 PM
Posted By: <b>Rhett Yeakley</b><p>For some reason you see a decent number of 1941's with the wrong back like this.<br />-Rhett<br /><img src="http://www.geocities.com/rhettmatthew_37/dickeypb.JPG">
Archive
10-22-2007, 01:44 PM
Posted By: <b>Danny Grimes</b><p>I have a tommy henrich 1941 Playball with upside down, miscut back of Arky Vaughn. Do these have a premium over the normal card?
Archive
10-22-2007, 01:46 PM
Posted By: <b>Gilbert Maines</b><p>Are these examples necessarilly the wrong backs?<br />I mean could Rhetts be a Camilli with an incorrect front, while Adams is a DiMaggio with a similar problem?
Archive
10-22-2007, 01:50 PM
Posted By: <b>Ted Zanidakis</b><p>ADAM W<br /><br />I had a Johnny Cooney (#50) front with a Joe DiMaggio back. I also had another Hi# with a Reese back (don't<br /> recall the front).<br /><br />Your card is very, very interesting, as it is the 1st Low # (Gumbert) that I've seen with a wrong back Hi# (Joe<br /> DiMaggio).<br /><br />The 1941 P/B Hi# wrong backs are quite plentiful....Rhett's is a typical example.<br /><br />TED Z