View Full Version : What is considered the Mickey Cochrane rookie card?
Archive
09-17-2007, 05:45 AM
Posted By: <b>Richard C</b><p>Greetings, what is considered the Mickey Cochrane rookie card? Look forward to some replies.<br />Thanks
Archive
09-17-2007, 05:50 AM
Posted By: <b>Phil Garry</b><p>1926 Sports Co. of America & 1926-29 Exhibit P/C Back
Archive
09-17-2007, 12:45 PM
Posted By: <b>Brad</b><p>Richard,<br /><br />Here's a list of all the Hofers RC's!!! <img src="/images/wink.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><a href="http://tinyurl.com/23sps8" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/23sps8</a>
Archive
09-19-2007, 01:39 PM
Posted By: <b>peter chao</b><p>Brad,<br /><br />Thanks for posting the link. It's very helpful. <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />Peter C.
Archive
09-19-2007, 03:09 PM
Posted By: <b>Frank Wakefield</b><p>Is Stan Musial on that tiny url list??
Archive
09-19-2007, 03:24 PM
Posted By: <b>peter chao</b><p>Frank,<br /><br />Looks like there's quite a number of recent HOFamers missing from the list.<br /><br />Peter C.
Archive
09-19-2007, 03:34 PM
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>It looks to be a list of HOF who's RC was pre-war
Archive
09-19-2007, 03:35 PM
Posted By: <b>boxingcardman</b><p>I don't put much stock in the rookie designation for many prewar HOFers because of their minor league cards. Cochrane has a pre-rookie card in the 1924 Zeenuts set. It is rarer and far more desirable (IMHO) than any of his MLB rookie cards. But then I'm biased in favor of PCL issues anyhow...
Archive
09-19-2007, 03:49 PM
Posted By: <b>jay behrens</b><p>calling a minor league card a rookie card is like calling a player in minor leagues a rookie. It may be a first card, but he's not in the majors yet.<br /><br />Personally, I think paying a premium for the first card or rookie card of a player is just plain silly. <br /><br />Jay<br><br>The richest person is not the one who has the most, but the one who needs the least.