View Full Version : T206 back scarcity and pricing analysis
Archive
08-19-2007, 03:34 PM
Posted By: <b>Frank C</b><p>I subtotaled the T206 PSA populations by listed back and came up with the following chart. I'm no economics expert, but if this sample is representative of the total population and there were no major hiccups in my subtotaling, the trend indicates that the market may need an adjustment on a few of these multipliers. If a subscriber to SGC could do the same maybe we could learn something. Maybe I should have started accumulating Broadleaf 350s before posting this <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> <br /><br />Back PopMult<br />Piedmont 6881 1<br />Cap 3009 1<br />Old Mill 613 1.3<br />polar bear4511.3<br />sovereign4051.3<br />el principe1661.3<br />tolstoi 1072<br />hindu 674<br />cycle 602<br />american beauty512<br />carolina brt225<br />lenox 1217<br />uzit 1030<br />broad leaf98<br />drum 565<br />
Archive
08-19-2007, 03:36 PM
Posted By: <b>Jim Dale</b><p>I take it the Broadleaf 350 and 460 are not divided?
Archive
08-19-2007, 03:40 PM
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>I'm not sure every T206 collector would agree that that is the precise order of scarcity. I would put Sovereign at third most common, and Cycle and Hindu are tougher than American Beauty, to cite two.<br /><br />That is only a list of cards submitted for grading, and does not represent the total population of T206.<br />
Archive
08-19-2007, 03:58 PM
Posted By: <b>Frank C</b><p>jim - unfortunately the PSA population report does not differentiate between different series of the same back. In fact for many cards backs are not listed at all. <br /><br />barry - I understand this just a sample of the overall T206 population, but I would argue that it would be a relatively unbiased sample, as opposed to the distribution of fronts (subjects), where you'll find many more Cobbs than Hinchmans. Unlike fronts, the back pricing is purely a function of scarcity. I'd be interested to see as large a sample as we could get - to see how well the numbers correlate with the perception.
Archive
08-19-2007, 04:09 PM
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>There are many past threads that go into relative back scarcity, and the multiplier effect, in great detail. A collector by the name of Bill Brown has done perhaps the most comprehensive study to date, and there are other board members with data, too.