View Full Version : For you rookie collectors, word to the wise
Archive
07-13-2007, 02:10 PM
Posted By: <b>Todd Schultz</b><p>in case you didn't already know, this is not the Babe's rookie card:<br /><br /><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/1916-BOSTON-STORE-BABE-RUTH-PSA-3-ROOKIE-EXT-RARE_W0QQitemZ290135161442QQihZ019QQcategoryZ31718 QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/1916-BOSTON-STORE-BABE-RUTH-PSA-3-ROOKIE-EXT-RARE_W0QQitemZ290135161442QQihZ019QQcategoryZ31718 QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem</a>
Archive
07-13-2007, 02:21 PM
Posted By: <b>Brad</b><p>Todd,<br /><br />Do you consider the M101-4 1916 Sporting News Ruth a RC? I do! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><a href="http://members.aol.com/METSBWD/Hofers/ruth.html" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://members.aol.com/METSBWD/Hofers/ruth.html</a>
Archive
07-13-2007, 02:22 PM
Posted By: <b>P Spaeth</b><p>I thought someone determined all the variations of this card were really 16 not 15 -- so if that is the case what is his rookie card?
Archive
07-13-2007, 02:29 PM
Posted By: <b>Todd Schultz</b><p>The Boston Store cards were issued in 1917, not 1916 as PSA labeled.
Archive
07-13-2007, 02:31 PM
Posted By: <b>P Spaeth</b><p>My bad, thanks.
Archive
07-13-2007, 05:09 PM
Posted By: <b>Phil Garry</b><p>The Boston Store card is much rarer than the Sporting News RC and I might choose that one if given an option between the two.