View Full Version : PSA & Qualifiers...They're the only ones...
Archive
07-09-2007, 09:19 PM
Posted By: <b>rand</b><p>I was thinking about SGC, GAI, SCD, ect...How come PSA is the only company that uses qualifiers? I think its interesting about Beckett's sub grades and has a half point scale. What do you all think about (OC) (MK) (PD) ect...do you like them? how come the other companies do not use their own version?
Archive
07-10-2007, 07:48 AM
Posted By: <b>Glyn Parson</b><p>MK is the only one i like or think is necessary.
Archive
07-10-2007, 07:54 AM
Posted By: <b>Steve f</b><p> My simple belief is that all cards be 'Authenticated' and if applicable, tagged 'altered' if any Improvements are found. (The new Gretzky Honus owner may be able to sleep better?)<br /><br /> To respond to your question. Qualifiers from sloppy factory snafus; Miscut, Print Defect or Off Center are hogwash. Deduct this from the grade. Human causes, ie Stained or Marked should note 'Q' option as it is now. <br />
Archive
07-10-2007, 07:40 PM
Posted By: <b>rand</b><p>I think the (oc) and (mc) sometimes over lap, i see alot of psa cards that could go either way, again, is it necessary?