moderating on the board [Archive] - Net54baseball.com Forums

Archive

04-13-2007, 09:09 AM

Posted By: leonIn my efforts to make this the best place I can I have something I want to bring up.... I got an email today from a valued board member that says, in essence, they don't like some comments being made that are offensive to others. Here is an excerpt of what they said.... "The thread about Jesika and her Wagner card is insultating and degregating. In my opinion, the comment about her meeting her future husband at the family reunion is no different than Don Imus' comments. The comment was made as a joke, but its wrong and the board doesn't need any of it. Same goes for Hal's comment in another thread about the Tango Eggs. I click into a thread hoping to learn from the comments in it, and someone has to go and post something inappropriate, given the light of the Imus situation especially." Personally I don't really care if some off handed comments are made but maybe I am so numbed by what goes on that I am not in tune with the majority of board members feelings. My response is basically that it was a joke and not that big of a deal. Personally, I think what Imus said was very wrong. He has been well reprimanded and now folks need to move on. I almost think what has been made out of his comment is as wrong as his comment, if not more so.....just my personal opinion on that. My main question is, "should I take a harder line on jokes like this on the board?". Should I try to tighten the ship on personal insults and/or off color jokes?

Archive

04-13-2007, 09:17 AM

Posted By: ChadWithin reason, of course. I think the board is well moderated in this regard. You gotta be able to let people hang themselves. BTW, what's "degregating"? --Chad

Archive

04-13-2007, 09:20 AM

Posted By: Dave FMy IMO is let the jokes go. Some people are funny...some aren't. As long as jokes don't get too far into personal insults, I don't see the harm. Everybody has differant levels they reach as far as taking offense to something. I didn't see a harm personally in the "family reunion" joke...and I'm from Georgia! I just don't think most people want a board moderated to the point that you can't voice anything other than facts...

Archive

04-13-2007, 09:20 AM

Posted By: MarkI started the thread in hopes of finding out what had happened with the Wagner card. I had hoped to maybe hear from her. Now with all the comments i don't think she will respond.

Archive

04-13-2007, 09:22 AM

Posted By: Dave FMark..I really doubt she would have responded, nor do I think she has even checked back in on this board. By now she has found out her card was fake, if she didn't know it before...I seriously doubt she is going to decide to start getting into the hobby...therefore, we won't ever hear from her again.

Archive

04-13-2007, 09:33 AM

Posted By: Joe D.but depending on where it comes from - I usually give the poster the benefit of the doubt - and just chalk it up as a poor attempt at humor. that being said... I would love an "ignore this thread" button next to each thread. It would let all of the threads I am interested in move to the front page of my screen. And if someone is offended by the contents of a thread... they can just click to ignore it. Can we get something like that going?

Archive

04-13-2007, 09:33 AM

Posted By: Chris BlandI say leave em for two reasons: I hate to see free speech get censored in any form, and sometimes you learn a lot about a person (positively and negatively) by the comments they make about someone else

Archive

04-13-2007, 09:54 AM

Posted By: Marty OgelvieI for one don't think a harder stance needs to be taken towards light hearted jokes. In the short amount of time I have been reading these boards I have yet to read anything that even made me think twice. I read the Jesika thread and don't even recall the family reunion remark and I was born/raised in the south. Stuff like that doesn't even register offensive to me. Perhaps I am not hyper-senstive. I think its up to the offended person to speak up and let others know that such and such comments offended them. After which the offendee can make amends if he or she chooses to and/or the Moderator can take action if need be. Jesika seemed to respond well to the comments thrown at her. I am sure she didn't appreciate some of them and she let those offenders know what she thought. I think she was more upset at coming to the realization that her card was fake more so than the barbs she was taking. She might have walked away disappointed but she didn't walk away with a black-eye. She gave as much as she got. martyOgelvie nyyankeecards.com

Archive

04-13-2007, 09:59 AM

Posted By: MikeI believe the forum is being handled correctly. And efficiently. Some folks on here are way too thin skinned and get offended at just about anything, they don't agree with. Personally, nothing offends me, because words are meaningless. Some comments or actions, both on here and off, may make me angry. But offended ? Never. Because leon is forced to deal with us humans, there are going to be times when us humans say or do dumb things. That's the nature of the beast. But..there is one thing I wish there that could be (excuse the pun) "trimmed" down a bit, and that is the name calling. Comments that neither add anything to the knowledge base, or educate. Things such as "stupid" "dumb" "idiot" I get real tired of that crap. It's a real turnoff. And it usually says more about the person doing the insulting or name calling. I had an individual absolutely come unglued on here one time, because I "jokingly" took a shot at Hillary Clinton. I mean come on. If we could just try and stick to old cardboard, or related topics, it would be much more pleasant. But leon is doing a good job, and the best he can. I assume Leon must have a life away from this board as well...He can't baby sit 24 hours a day. Nor should he have to.

Archive

04-13-2007, 09:59 AM

Posted By: barrysloateChris- I think it may be more complicated than that because if you believe in any free speech then what Don Imus said would be perfectly acceptable. But it was in fact despicable. Leon, you are as tolerant and laissez-faire as you can possibly be. I think you have a right to expect people on the board to conduct themselves maturely. If you feel in your heart that something is inappropriate and might offend others, it is not be a bad idea to take some kind of stand. Perhaps start out with an email to the poster to express your opinion that the comment was in poor taste. It's your call in the end, but you don't have to feel that every time you get involved that you are censoring the board. CBS and MSNBC are rightfully censoring Imus, and most reasonable people feel it is the proper thing to do.

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:12 AM

Posted By: Chris BlandBarry, I agree what Imus said was reprehensible, but I believe he had a right to say it. Our society, not censorship, should determine if he gets to keep his platform for speech or not, in my humble opinion.

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:16 AM

Posted By: barrysloateChris- do Neo-Nazis have the right to march down Main Street of your town and spew their venom? Can the Klan have a meeting by your town hall and call for the lynching of minorities? I don't interpret free speech to mean you can say any blessed thing you want. There have to be limits.

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:18 AM

Posted By: Chris BlandBarry, who has a right to set those limits? i would argue our society as a whole does, wouldnt you?

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:19 AM

Posted By: MikeHere we go again.......

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:19 AM

Posted By: barrysloateIf society has that right, and I agree with you on that point, then isn't Leon as moderator a member of society? Edited to add Mike, I'll keep it civil <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:24 AM

Posted By: joeBarry, unfortunately yes the neo-nazis and the klan can have marches down anyones main street. of course they can't call for lynching of minorities. That's what our country has come to, very, very liberal views. We see these marches on the news time and time again. Joe Ty Cobb, Spikes flying!

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:28 AM

Posted By: Chris Blandbarry, I am making this my last post on this, because this is a baseball card board and i personally prefer to talk cards when i do post. My subsequent replies to you were not about the board per se; I was responding to your inclusion of Imus as a means of comparison to my comment about free speech. I would agree Leon is the "representative" of our society here, and I think he does a fine job of checking with us to gather a consensus as to what is acceptable or not. My initial response was my one vote in the matter...

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:29 AM

Posted By: Josh AdamsThe First Amendment only applies to government regulation. not an internet message board moderated by a couple guys. Second, the First Amendment only works when it protects the most reprehsible viewpoints. Nazis have just as much of a right to march (as long as that march does not include physical attacks), as the NAACP, DARE, or any other group. To sensor because one finds a certain viewpoint vile, is a scary thing. What happens if one day society finds your viewpoint "unacceptable." It's got nothing to do with "liberal" although people like to throw that word around alot. In fact, Sandra Day O'Connor would probably laugh at being called such, considering her opinions in various First Amendment cases. Bottom line, everyone should be able to say what they want (with general exceptions, i.e. "fire" in a crowded room). Of course, we all have the choice of just not listening.

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:33 AM

Posted By: ChadI'm not sure I get that. The Klan and the skinheads have a consitutional right to assemble--that's neither liberal or conservative, just American. Threatening to lynch people is, of course, against the law. And I'm not sure liberals or conservatives would argue that kind of "speech" shouldn't be illegal as it obviously should be. As for Imus, it's free speech all around--Imus said what he wanted, people offended reacted in the way they wanted, and CBS and NBC reacted in the way they saw fit. The government stayed out of it as they should. It was an orgy of freedom! --Chad

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:34 AM

Posted By: barrysloateImus was in fact free to say what he did. But you know, it didn't work out too well, and the firestorm it caused really wasn't worth it to him. It might have cost him his career, it was hurtful to a group of mature college women, it was misogynistic and disgraceful, and I'm sure we haven't heard the last of it. Yes, he was free to say it, but it sure was incredibly stupid. So getting back to the point Leon brought up, I think he has a right to expect a certain decorum on the board. And Chris, we're just debating, so please don't take it personally. Thank you.

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:37 AM

Posted By: Chris BlandBarry nothing personal taken at all - i love a good debate (although I generally lose <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>) but i would prefer it be on a topic like "who is the toughest OJ HOFer" if I am on this board! take care, chris

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:38 AM

Posted By: BcDdid you see this! <a href="http://dwb.fresnobee.com/24hour/front/story/3597391p-12869919c.html" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://dwb.fresnobee.com/24hour/front/story/3597391p-12869919c.html</a> BcD <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:47 AM

Posted By: barrysloateChris- agreed, but Leon started this thread asking our opinion about whether he should take a stand when someone posts in bad taste. It was as much a question about manners as it was about censorship.

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:52 AM

Posted By: barrysloateBrian- I did know Vonnegut died, I read his obituary this morning. I saw him occasionally on the East End; I was once at a book party that he attended and he was kind of quiet and not very social.

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:53 AM

Posted By: Rob DewolfIf there's anything this country needs it's more censorship and editing, especially on an Internet message board about freaking baseball cards. I'm pretty tired of hearing how offended practically everyone gets over practically anything. I apologize ahead of time if I offended any two-headed people with my use of the word freaking.

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:54 AM

Posted By: MikeCouldn't agree more Rob. Right on !

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:55 AM

Posted By: James FeaginNot that I agree or care what Imus said, there are just a bunch of people that feigned offense at his comments so they wouldn't be thrown under the bus by association. They really weren't offended, it was just convenient for them professionally to be so.

Archive

04-13-2007, 10:55 AM

Posted By: barrysloateHey- I'm offended by hip-hop lyrics, I think they are despicable. But nobody asked my opinion.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:00 AM

Posted By: barrysloateJames- he called girls he never met whores! Some of them may go to church every Sunday, some may be virgins, many of them are on the dean's list...how could any reasonable person not be offended? I think an African American offensive lineman who is about 6' 8" and weighs 340 pounds and who has a daughter should take Mr. Imus into a private room, lock the door, and spend about ten minutes showing him what decency is all about. Then perhaps he will think twice next time.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:04 AM

Posted By: leonI will only let this thread go a little while longer. I am getting the jest of what the board wants. It's the same thing I want. I promise this thread won't go past this evening, maybe not that late. I just had to make sure I was on track. I am very overboard on not censoring, or editing, sometimes to a fault. I will continue. I love the hobby......

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:11 AM

Posted By: James FeaginHe called girls he never met whores, true. How many nationally-syndicated shock jocks do that, or worse daily, without impunity? The difference is that most of these women are part of a protected group. If these women were not part of a protected group, no one would bat so much as an eye.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:12 AM

Posted By: JoannLeon, I think it should stay the way it is. People do need to have thick skins to off-hand remarks. I don't note that any one individual is routinely over the line or constantly making offensive comments under the guise of humor. People here are generally very good, and even very good people can make a verbal gaffe or even an intentional statement that is maybe too close to the edge. So what? If one or two people were doing it all the time, I have no doubt in my mind it would get addressed in the normal course of moderating the board, based on a recognition that the person offends more than a few people and more than occasionally. And a note on Imus - because there truly is some parallel to his situation and the question of this thread: Perfect example of a good person saying the wrong thing (see above). His show is sarcastic, edgy and no real sacred cows. Even in that context, the comment was over the line - no doubt about that. But the aftermath was a complete shame. He apologized and it was very sincere. He suggested things he was going to do to make up for it and change his show. If you saw him on his show the past few days I have no doubt the contrition was genuine. But that wasn't enough for the head-hunters who smelled blood and saw an opportunity to grandstand on it (you listening, Al Sharpton?). They took a bad thing and made it worse by completely disallowing any opportunity for reconciliation or dialog. Only complete destruction of the man and his career would do. So .. to tie these two together. Let's let good people make jokes and be themselves on this board. If something occasionally goes over the line let it stay in that context. Save the total destruction for someone that really deserves it - in this case by constant and unabated racial, sexual or otherwise offensive humor. We'll know when it happens. Just like we knew that Sean had crossed a different line in a different way. Thanks for the ear. Joann

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:15 AM

Posted By: MarkPerhaps a related question is whether there should be any limits on what may be said in n54 chat. For example, should racial slurs/threats against member families be allowed?

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:15 AM

Posted By: Jason LThe Don Imus thing has become embarrassingly out-of-control. The levels of hypocrisy being displayed by nearly everyone grabbing a microphone on this topic this week is astonishing. Now it has spread to this Board? The inbreeding joke in the Jesicka thread was funny. People who are offended by an incest joke, well...perhaps they should be upset about other things in their lives....I mean no personal attacks here, honest. I agree with JoshA...which is just great....as a White Sox fan, you are supposed to be my mortal enemy, and for the first time in my memory, I am on your side. wonderful...my whole universe is about to go spinning madly out of control. RobD - very well said. Leon, to answer your original question and keep myself on topic here, I have to say that I am quite impressed with your moderating skills, and generally, once a thread has nothing left to offer, you step in and lock it down, which is appropriate. Please continue to do so. carry on everyone, nothing to see here... Edited to say that I love when these issues pop up in the news, because that's when I am reminded that freedom of speech in this country is apparently based upon race.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:20 AM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanI think if you are touchy about every little thing that is on this board then this board is not for you. Leon has always handled everything in the right manner. What Imus said was hateful and nasty and he had no RIGHT to say it -- not when he's got an employer and has some responsibility to them (and presumably to the listening public). If he wanted to say it on the street corner that would have been ok. Not when he's working for a company and the company has sponsors and responsiblities to listners and viewers. My advice to those who get upset about some of the stuff they read here: go to a different thread. In defense of Hal, by the way, he said nothing inappropriate at all. Lighten up, Francis.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:32 AM

Posted By: John SMy humble opinion...let the comments stand. As an educator I walk on eggshells constantly fearing that the an innocuous statement will be misconstrued by a student. As a society we have become hypersensitive and vigilant regarding any action or statement that can be interpreted as offensive to some group. With that said the comments that Imus made were tasteless and crude. The Rutger's girls have every right to be offended by his statements. However, if I say that I am offended if someone calls me a white-trash hillbilly that should carry as much weight. I have disciplined students, both white and black, for using racially charged language. The N-word or cracker doesn't sound good coming out of anyone's mouth.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:32 AM

Posted By: James FeaginJoann---Agreed. Protected groups can say anything, and if it so happens to cross the line, then no worries, they can simply apologize. Their historic oppression has entitled them to not be responsible for words they may utter. Non-protected groups have to monitor themselves and if they cross the line, there's hell to pay, an NO apology can take it back or make ammends.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:39 AM

Posted By: leonI hear ya....but please understand that I can't moderate the chatroom area. It's impossible. Should those things be said over there? Absolutely not. They are dispicable. I don't go in there too often on purpose. I feel it's a benefit for some to have it, but everyone needs to know that it is no different than talking in person and I can't moderate it...nor will I take action on stuff that goes on in there, since I don't moderate it. If I get too many folks complaining then I could shut the whole thing down. Except for a few isolated incidents, which were bad, I haven't had to deal with much over there in over 2 yrs....Actually, including yours, there might have been about 1 other issue....The "shi* to equity ratio" tells me I should leave it the way it is.....In retrospect I am truly sorry for what was said over there about the situation you are talking about....

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:45 AM

Posted By: barrysloateFor anyone who thought what Imus said was just boys being boys, and that it is alright to say what he did because all shock jocks do it, please answer just this one question: If it were your daughter who played on the Rutger's basketball team, would you still be chuckling? Would you still be saying 'hey, it's America, he is free to express his opinions."

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:46 AM

Posted By: Robi have been happy with the content on this board for the past few weeks I've been a member here. Enjoyable reading, and the occasional OT thought just adds flavor. IMUS - forgive my ingnorance, if thats what it is, but i didn't realize that "nappy head" was a racial term, cuz i've jokingly told friends (of every ethnicity) that they've got nappy hair. I thought nappy meant greasy or something, and didn't realize it was a racist comment. And i didn't think "hoe" was racial either. Maybe i'm wrong. Certainly it wasn't a nice comment, but i don't think many of the people calling for Imus to get fired actually LISTEN to his program in the first place. I'd guess that most of his listeners are use to him taking shots at other people. If you don't like it, change the dial to a different radio station. Some people just want to find something to complain about cuz they have nothing better to do. So, onto baseball collectibles! What do poeple use to store their big photos/supplements in?

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:47 AM

Posted By: davidcyclebackI don't think folks should be insulting others, but the Jessika thread seemed to be a minor dust up. Leon should remind people to mind their manors, and that should be sufficient. I think Leon does a good job as moderator.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:49 AM

Posted By: JoannJames, Just to clarify - and I'm not sure this is what you were saying - I did not mean to imply that society allows some groups to say what they want while others can't. I wasn't drawing any distinction between the ability or inability of different groups to freely speak. I was saying that I thought the Imus situation was an opportunity to have some genuine progress and growth on this issue. I've seen many of what I consider to be fake apologies by public figures that misspoke. I didn't think his apology was fake at all, nor compelled. I thought he was genuinely sorry and not just because of the brushfire it had started. It could have been very positive if the hand had been allowed to play itself out. We may have seen what it looks like, and what can happen, when there is a true effort for constructive reconciliation following such a huge blunder. But the howlers (and they were from ALL groups - not just African-Americans or even Al Sharpton) made this impossible. And Barry - no, I wouldn't be chuckling at all. I wasn't chuckling even though I have no dog in this fight, as they say. But if I were in that position, I hope I would try to at least hear the man out and see where it went, and to recognize that people do make mistakes. I don't know if I would - I have never been in that position. But I hope I would. Joann

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:49 AM

Posted By: Tom NievesThese pretzels are making me thirsty.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:52 AM

Posted By: Steve M.Where are you from? Guess because I grew up in NC on a tobacco farm (true)that it's pretty clear to me that use of the word "nappy" is definitley a racially charged word.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:54 AM

Posted By: Jason Land to be honest, I am not entirely sure how I would respond. I probably wouldn't like it, but: 1) Athletes at that level and above are entertainers, and as such are in the public eye, and should be accustomed (or getting accustomed) to being a target for praise and derision alike and 2) I hope I would shrug it off, just as I would comments made by other people who don't know me I just don't know how truly offended those folks can be, given that they are a public target, entertainers, in the spotlight, etc...there is no personal relationship or contact that should cause that comment to truly hit a sensitive nerve... I don't know good question though.

Archive

04-13-2007, 11:57 AM

Posted By: JKI think the board is fine just the way it is - there is no need to censor every joke or comment that is made. As for the Imus situation, I couldnt agree more with Jason's comments about hypocracy. While I think the comments were inappropriate, why is it that Jesse Jackson of all people is calling for him to be fired - has everyone forgotten about Jackson's "hymie town" comment? How many other anti-semitic comments do you think he has made? What moral high ground does he stand on where he can call for anyone's termination without offering up his own resignation? Why is it ok for comedians and rap artists to throw around racist words and everybody yawns. Finally, I dont know if anybody recalls this or not, but soon after the Duke Lacrosse players were accussed of rape, Sharpton and Jackson were in Durham convicting those kids in the media. Does anybody here think that Sharpton or Jackson called them to apologize for their actions now that the charges have been dismissed?

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:05 PM

Posted By: barrysloateThere are different degrees of insults, and there are different levels of transgression. Mr. Imus's comment was so over the top that I think it might be too late for an apology. Chris Rock is a very talented comedian and his stand-up is peppered with the "N" word; and audiences generally howl in laughter at his caustic humor. Does any one feel it would be funny if Jerry Seinfeld used the "N" word in one of his comedy monologues? Dom Imus has proven to me what I've always suspected about him- that he's just plain stupid, has nothing worthwhile to offer, and it's now time for him to get off the air. Maybe Mr. Sharpton and company are milking the moment for everything it's worth, but for once I think I agree with him. Added to say Josh, Jesse Jackson's anti-semitic remark is just as despicable. Too many public figures think they can get away with this stuff and they should all be taken to task. Has nothing to do with being thin-skinned; it's just about simple decency.

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:09 PM

Posted By: Dan BrettaImus' remarks were stupid and insensitive. He was trying to be funny and it backfired on him. I don't believe he is a racist. Imagine if Howard Stern had said the same thing....nobody would be talking about it today. PS. Tom Nieves I don't know who you are, but you just made milk go up my nose. Thanks for the laugh.

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:12 PM

Posted By: Dave SAmen JK!! One thing I think that should remain in context is the target audience that Imus draws...those that listen are generally used to his shenanigans and biased comments regardless of whether related to race, religion, or sex. Yes his ignorance borders on insanity and yes his comment what wrong...but those are the exact kind of comments that draws the audience he appeals to. And right or wrong, the big advertisers have known his tactics for years and continued to fund the show... As for Sharpton and Jackson, as Matt Lauer insinuated on the Today show...they want equal rights for everyone, "as long as they aren't white"! Jesse Jackson has and always has been about Jesse Jackson, not the black race in general. And Sharpton follows that same example. He made the comment this morning that the reason black rappers use the "ho", etc. lyrics they do is because of their white producers demand it! Totally ludicrous, get over it!

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:13 PM

Posted By: AlanLeon - This thread is going to get real ugly, real fast. I have a feeling you'll lock it before evening.... <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdlKux504-c" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdlKux504-c</a>

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:14 PM

Posted By: barrysloateDan- why would Howard Stern being any less culpabale if he said the same thing?

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:19 PM

Posted By: robTom, that was brilliant!

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:25 PM

Posted By: E, DanielJames and Joanne. If any man calls my little girl a whore - I'm not going to wait and listen and hear the man out. I'm going to f@#* him up. That is, unless society takes the appropriate action, and f@#*s him up for me. Political correctness? I prefer to think of it as Moral correctness, and your right to be a miserable piece of scum only extends so far as you limit your hurt to yourself, and not others. When you hurt others, saying sorry as some get out of jail card just diappears. Step on my toe, sorry works. Demean my child in a way that may stick with her for years, affect how she interacts with society, whether she feels safe.....nah, sorry doesn't work all that well. How's that for simple, the right of free speech, and the likelihood of repurcussions? Doesn't bother you so much? That's great, no doubt your children will appreciate your devotion to freedom of speech were they to experience such defiling description. You'll be their absolute hero, no doubt! Daniel

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:26 PM

Posted By: RobSteve M., I'm from Connecticut, but spent ages 8-15 in Jacksonville, Florida. I heard the term alot in grade school and picked it up there. So, if i understand correctly, a person of non-African decent can't have nappy hair? I don't get it. "nappy" seems like an adjective. greasy or frizzy. I didn't realize it was racial so maybe I won't use it anymore. Rob <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:31 PM

Posted By: Dan BrettaBarry, Howard Stern says offensive stuff every day - he gets away with it because it's his schtick and nobody takes him seriously... I don't think people realize that Imus was the same type of shock jock as Stern in his early radio days...I also think you can't say that type of stuff though when you work for NBC and CBS and they acted appropriately in this case. They can't afford to lose viewers, listeners and sponsors. With that said I think Al Sharpton is a despicable man...one only need to remember the Tawana Brawley case and just recently the comments he made about NY City police officers involved in the Sean Bell case. Why anyone gives him a platform to speak is amazing to me....it's probably the same reason the media still gives Ann Coulter a platform. It's no longer about reporting the news it's all about making it.

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:31 PM

Posted By: JK"If it were your daughter who played on the Rutger's basketball team, would you still be chuckling? Would you still be saying 'hey, it's America, he is free to express his opinions." Barry - My answer is, I may not like that it was said and I may not agree with the statement, but I would absolutely still believe that he was free to express his opinions - as we all are. With regard to Imus, at the end of the day, his employer may not want him to express those opinions in the workplace (which in his case is on the air) and his employer is free to take any action it wishes to discipline him for those comments. As noted above, the Constitution on protects you from government interference with your right to expression. Your employer (assuming you work for a private employer) does not have to afford you any free speech rights.

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:37 PM

Posted By: John“Doesn't bother you so much? That's great, no doubt your children will appreciate your devotion to freedom of speech were they to experience such defiling description. You'll be their absolute hero, no doubt!” Daniel, tread lightly on that one, I know James and from what I know he and his wife are proud and wonderful parents. Kids couldn’t ask for a more loving home as far I can tell. So parenting advice aside, just keep that in mind. I think James and Joann are just voicing their opinions on the matter. My take on freedom of speech is simple. Say what ever the hell you want, where you want, when you want. However be prepared for the repercussions of your statements and take your lumps, and don’t cry the blues or the victim when people don’t agree with your comments.

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:43 PM

Posted By: Dan BrettaExactly John. Know your audience and know your employer. Bill Maher got cancelled for saying something politically incorrect on his show of the same name. The Dixie Chicks got tarred/feathered and booted from Country Radio for saying they were embarrassed that Bush was from Texas, Imus got canned from MSNBC for inappropriate comments about the Rutgers basketball team.

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:45 PM

Posted By: JimBI am for keeping this forum as it is. Even in this thread the underbelly of racisim rears its head and I personally don't mind knowing where people stand on these sorts of things, though I generally like to keep politics and religion out of my hobbies. I saw Al Sharpton on CNN a couple of days ago and thought he was very articulate and on target. The interviewer kept trying to twist his words and he kept it pretty straightforward. When Imus went on his show to apologize and then called Sharpton's arguments "jive", I think it was very revealing of where he was coming from on race. In this democracy, he is free to say and think what he wants, but I don't think he is deserving of a pulpit where his opinions are broadcast to millions. Barry, I think there is a big difference between when Chris Rock or any African American uses the "N" word and when a white person does. When a white person (as a person from the historically oppressing class in this country) uses a term like that which has for centuries been used by whites to denigrate a race of people, it perpetuates everything negative about the word and the attitudes it represents. When a black person takes a term like and uses it in a way that disengages it from its traditionally oppressive usage, its affect can be transformative of traditional racist attudes. When Chris Rock uses it, it can stimulate reflection in positive ways. WHen a KKK member uses it, it perpetuates a tradition of hatred. I don't think it is as black and white (pardon the pun) as to say that either everyone can use a word or nobody can. I don't know if that is what you were suggesting or not, but your comment stimulated my response which is trying to highlight some of the nuances. Jim

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:51 PM

Posted By: Steve fThe reverands Sharpton and Jackson are the epitome of opportunists and bigger 'sinners' by far. On Imus, I agree with them however. His show was sometimes funny, but that old Oscar the Grouch wanabe needed to go. I also believe Howard is far worse but protected, by cleverly teaming with Robin. Mod, You don't need to babysit us, much.

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:54 PM

Posted By: JK"Even in this thread the underbelly of racisim rears its head" Jim - I would sure like to know who you believe has shown themselves to be racist on this board. Because despite my belief that this whole situation is infested with hypocracy, it doesnt mean I or anyone else sharing my views are racist or otherwise believe Imus' comments were appropriate in any way.

Archive

04-13-2007, 12:55 PM

Posted By: barrysloateJim- I know blacks use the "N" word among themselves as a way of demystifying it and rendering it powerless, but there is actually a movement now among blacks to take the word completely out of the vocabulary. However, what two friends say to each other is much different than what some insensitive idiot says over the airwaves. And I am well aware of Al Sharpton's sordid past, and that whole Tawana Brawley fiasco. I'm not sticking up for him, but he is right in this instance to express his outrage. I'm not one of his fans for sure.

Archive

04-13-2007, 01:02 PM

Posted By: Dan BrettaI've heard both African American and white kids using the N word with each other. I believe that the younger generation is - to use Barry's word demystifying the word. How many of us know that "Chicano" was a racist slur against Mexican Americans in Texas in the early 1900's? It was in the 1960s that Mexican American groups began to proudly call themselves Chicano's that the word lost it's original meaning. I'm not saying that the same thing should be done with the N word, but to today's kids the word does not have the same powerful hate attached to it that it does to the older generations.

Archive

04-13-2007, 01:02 PM

Posted By: JKThe problem Barry is that Sharpton's outrage is manufactured. I just don't buy it. Where was his outrage when Jackson was denengrading (sp?) Jewish people? Where is his outrage that three college students were wrongfully accused and convicted by many in the media, including himself, before any facts were known about the case?

Archive

04-13-2007, 01:03 PM

Posted By: Peter SpaethApologies if this was already posted. COMMENTARY Imus isn’t the real bad guy Instead of wasting time on irrelevant shock jock, black leaders need to be fighting a growing gangster culture. By JASON WHITLOCK Columnist Thank you, Don Imus. You’ve given us (black people) an excuse to avoid our real problem. You’ve given Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson another opportunity to pretend that the old fight, which is now the safe and lucrative fight, is still the most important fight in our push for true economic and social equality. You’ve given Vivian Stringer and Rutgers the chance to hold a nationally televised recruiting celebration expertly disguised as a news conference to respond to your poor attempt at humor. Thank you, Don Imus. You extended Black History Month to April, and we can once again wallow in victimhood, protest like it’s 1965 and delude ourselves into believing that fixing your hatred is more necessary than eradicating our self-hatred. The bigots win again. While we’re fixated on a bad joke cracked by an irrelevant, bad shock jock, I’m sure at least one of the marvelous young women on the Rutgers basketball team is somewhere snapping her fingers to the beat of 50 Cent’s or Snoop Dogg’s or Young Jeezy’s latest ode glorifying nappy-headed pimps and hos. I ain’t saying Jesse, Al and Vivian are gold-diggas, but they don’t have the heart to mount a legitimate campaign against the real black-folk killas. It is us. At this time, we are our own worst enemies. We have allowed our youths to buy into a culture (hip hop) that has been perverted, corrupted and overtaken by prison culture. The music, attitude and behavior expressed in this culture is anti-black, anti-education, demeaning, self-destructive, pro-drug dealing and violent. Rather than confront this heinous enemy from within, we sit back and wait for someone like Imus to have a slip of the tongue and make the mistake of repeating the things we say about ourselves. It’s embarrassing. Dave Chappelle was offered $50 million to make racially insensitive jokes about black and white people on TV. He was hailed as a genius. Black comedians routinely crack jokes about white and black people, and we all laugh out loud. I’m no Don Imus apologist. He and his tiny companion Mike Lupica blasted me after I fell out with ESPN. Imus is a hack. But, in my view, he didn’t do anything outside the norm for shock jocks and comedians. He also offered an apology. That should’ve been the end of this whole affair. Instead, it’s only the beginning. It’s an opportunity for Stringer, Jackson and Sharpton to step on victim platforms and elevate themselves and their agenda$. I watched the Rutgers news conference and was ashamed. Martin Luther King Jr. spoke for eight minutes in 1963 at the March on Washington. At the time, black people could be lynched and denied fundamental rights with little thought. With the comments of a talk-show host most of her players had never heard of before last week serving as her excuse, Vivian Stringer rambled on for 30 minutes about the amazing season her team had. Somehow, we’re supposed to believe that the comments of a man with virtually no connection to the sports world ruined Rutgers’ wonderful season. Had a broadcaster with credibility and a platform in the sports world uttered the words Imus did, I could understand a level of outrage. But an hourlong press conference over a man who has already apologized, already been suspended and is already insignificant is just plain intellectually dishonest. This is opportunism. This is a distraction. In the grand scheme, Don Imus is no threat to us in general and no threat to black women in particular. If his words are so powerful and so destructive and must be rebuked so forcefully, then what should we do about the idiot rappers on BET, MTV and every black-owned radio station in the country who use words much more powerful and much more destructive? I don’t listen or watch Imus’ show regularly. Has he at any point glorified selling crack cocaine to black women? Has he celebrated black men shooting each other randomly? Has he suggested in any way that it’s cool to be a baby-daddy rather than a husband and a parent? Does he tell his listeners that they’re suckers for pursuing education and that they’re selling out their race if they do? When Imus does any of that, call me and I’ll get upset. Until then, he is what he is — a washed-up shock jock who is very easy to ignore when you’re not looking to be made a victim. No. We all know where the real battleground is. We know that the gangsta rappers and their followers in the athletic world have far bigger platforms to negatively define us than some old white man with a bad radio show. There’s no money and lots of danger in that battle, so Jesse and Al are going to sit it out.

Archive

04-13-2007, 01:13 PM

Posted By: barrysloateJosh- I think you are focussing too much on Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. I almost don't even care what they have to say. But I am very focussed on what Don Imus said. And Peter- you can put any spin you want on the fact that the African-American community has milked this incident for all it was worth. But it's not what I'm concerned with. I'm concerned with that waste of time named Don Imus, and all the other shock jocks who make a living acting like idiots. In the last ten years I don't think I've listened to three minutes of talk radio, because I believe it is all worthless. I have the radio on all day since I work at home, and I pretty much listen to classic rock. John Lennon and Bob Dylan have a lot of important things to say. Don Imus has no clue, so he covers it up by being a pig. That's what you do when you are devoid of any discernable talent.

Archive

04-13-2007, 01:15 PM

Posted By: Al SPeter well put well said LEON read your words its time to close the thread!!!

Archive

04-13-2007, 01:16 PM

Posted By: Peter SpaethDo you feel the same way about MTV and the record companies and the radio stations and the African-American DJ's promoting rap music that is far more offensive than anything Imus said?

Archive

04-13-2007, 01:18 PM

Posted By: E, Daniel"Protected groups can say anything, and if it so happens to cross the line, then no worries, they can simply apologize. Their historic oppression has entitled them to not be responsible for words they may utter. Non-protected groups have to monitor themselves and if they cross the line, there's hell to pay, an NO apology can take it back or make ammends. " "Protected groups"? "Non protected groups"? To me, even understanding Wonka's post, this statement boldly paints one person's understanding of the world he lives in, that he feels not part of a larger grouping called human beings and universal rights and wrongs, but instead segregated groupings whose experiences are so different he is mystefied by their brutalized journey into society's grudging acceptance. You can taste the very distaste and disapproval in the words, and gnawing injustice he percieves. Makes me sick. Same way people talk about "the jews in holliwood and how they run everything" even as they follow up with "not that there's anything wrong with that, you've got to give them credit for being so creative and ingenious at coopting all that power..". Or on gays and "their lifestyles", and how many white christians truly believe in their soul that these 'people' are only getting what they deserve and gods corrective punishment. For me, anytime you seperate yourself from understanding injustice that would be injustice in your own world every-bit-as-much as it is in someone else's, you add a grain of intolerance and hate into this world. Just because justice doesn't come equally to all people at all times, doesn't mean you shouldn't believe that it must at every opportunity it can. Daniel