PDA

View Full Version : Honus Wagner cabinet


Archive
04-05-2007, 08:30 AM
Posted By: <b>Chris Bland</b><p>Saw this on ebay and decided to roll the dice a bit - I am not sure what this piece is exactly - does anyone here have any thoughts? Thanks in advance<br /><br /><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=018&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=280098789404&rd=1&rd=1" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=018&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=280098789404&rd=1&rd=1</a>

Archive
04-05-2007, 08:31 AM
Posted By: <b>chris</b><p>saw this one too, but forgot about it...would be interested to hear other opinions also..

Archive
04-05-2007, 09:07 AM
Posted By: <b>D</b><p>NM

Archive
04-05-2007, 09:20 AM
Posted By: <b>Joe D.</b><p>The seller mentions in the Question and Answer portion that it is NOT an acutal signature (but rather part of the negative).<br /><br />I am no photo expert... and it might be a bad scan....<br />but this does not look like a first generation item.<br /><br />Photo quality is not that nice at all.<br /><br />Again in the Question and Answer - someone dated the picture taking to 1917.... and the seller mentions 1928 as a date of the piece.<br /><br /><br />I watched the item... but based on my thinking it is not a first generation photo....<br /> I would not have come close to that amount of $... and I personally think it is worth only a fraction of what it went for.<br />

Archive
04-05-2007, 09:23 AM
Posted By: <b>Dan Bretta</b><p>Joe, you and I were on the same page...and considering he had a Gehrig w/wife photo in the same type of cabinet folder it just didn't seem right to me.

Archive
04-05-2007, 09:34 AM
Posted By: <b>Mark L</b><p>Honus's uniform looks like the one they wore in 1912. I know that they added pinstripes a couple years later but could have used the uni in the picture at any time, I guess. Right now I can't find the website that chronicles this stuff.

Archive
04-05-2007, 09:42 AM
Posted By: <b>Dan Bretta</b><p><a href="http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/exhibits/online_exhibits/dressed_to_the_nines/database.htm" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/exhibits/online_exhibits/dressed_to_the_nines/database.htm</a>

Archive
04-05-2007, 09:56 AM
Posted By: <b>Chris Bland</b><p>Seller offered a 7 day return, so at worst I will send it back. Without the return policy, I would never have bid...

Archive
04-05-2007, 10:04 AM
Posted By: <b>Mark L</b><p>Thanks Dan

Archive
04-05-2007, 10:05 AM
Posted By: <b>Steve M.</b><p>Auction just closed yesterday. Paypal not offered. Can't imagine that you've paid yet. Are you planning on paying then getting the item and then sending it back? Or are you going to pay, get the item, and then decide?<br /><br />Looked like some nice high level activity on the item. Underbidder has a history of bidding on this type of material. Three bidders over the 1K level. Might turn out to be a nice acquisition. Hard to tell.<br /><br />

Archive
04-05-2007, 10:05 AM
Posted By: <b>Dave</b><p>I know that I have seen this picture before. It might be in the Smithsonian book but I can't remember. I do remember printing a copy of it at home and giving it to a friend about a year ago. If someone has the book available, maybe they can look it up.

Archive
04-05-2007, 10:17 AM
Posted By: <b>Chris Bland</b><p>Steve<br /><br />I was planning to get the item in hand before deciding fully - figured I would post it here and see if someone knew something definite about it that might save me trouble...<br /><br />The image was featured in the Smithsonian Baseball book.

Archive
04-05-2007, 10:17 AM
Posted By: <b>Steve f</b><p>Looks like a cut n paste dugout image was this possible at such high quality? The bluish fading is weird. The way the frame is shaped (pointing downward into his head) doesn't seem thought out. The seller appears honest and knowledgeable, but I'm not so sure I agree on this. His shoes are shiny, so it may well be a studio shot. Skeptical here,hope I'm wrong, that's a lotta dough for even an old reprint -Once bitten twice shy. <br /><br />I'd like to hear some other evals.<br /><br />Chris, Do you have a scan of the Smithsonian page?

Archive
04-05-2007, 10:37 AM
Posted By: <b>Dan Bretta</b><p>I don't like the fact that these photos are in the foldout type of cabinet that you usually see reserved for graduation or family photos. Not to mention this guys dates are way off especially on the Gehrig photo which he says is from 1927, pencil written in "1928" which is odd since the Yankees didn't wear uniforms with the NY on the front until 1936.<br /><br />Good luck to you Chris - I hope it's a real first generation photo.<br /><br />edited to add ebay link: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/27pnrx" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/27pnrx</a><br />

Archive
04-05-2007, 10:43 AM
Posted By: <b>Mark</b><p>have some kind of color variation from being in the sleeve? At least an outline from being in the holder for many years.<br /><br />I am not saying its not real, just looking for some kind of fading for being that many years old in the jacket.

Archive
04-05-2007, 10:55 AM
Posted By: <b>Chris Bland</b><p>I am pretty certain that the photo and the green frame are not original to each other (the studio names are different). I am not really considering the green frame as a true part of the cabinet.

Archive
04-05-2007, 10:58 AM
Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>If I am not mistaken, the picture in the Smithsonian book has the same bluish tint on the bottom as well. I can check when I get home if someone else doesn't have it handy.

Archive
04-05-2007, 11:53 AM
Posted By: <b>davidcycleback</b><p>My guess is it isn't genuine. <br /><br />There are too many things wrong with it. Including most 1900s cabinets aren't this color and usually have some sort of embossment. The stamp on back is similar to an 1800s stamp (crayon portraits are old time). There are famous folks cabinets with faux 'compliments of' signatures like this, but they are usually entirely on the mount, not straddling the photo and mount. The folder is vintage, but has nothing to do with the photo, as it's from a different studio. The photo wouldn't be from 1928 as the seller describes. Not only did they not make cabinets in 1928, but Wagner would have been 54 in 1928 and he retired in 1917. The image has a cross hatching background which is unusual. Why would Wagner, a lifelong resident of Pittsburgh, be posing in a Pirates uniform in Kingston NY? It's not impossible for Wagner to have a photo taken in Kingston NY (I had a Cap Anson street clothes cabinet shot in Syracuse), but wouldn't it seem more likely for it to be taken in Pennsylvania or a big MLB city like Chicago or Washington DC?<br /><br />Genuine photos can have an out of the ordinary, maybe even strange quality, maybe even two. This one, and the description, has a whole bunch of incongruities.

Archive
04-05-2007, 01:55 PM
Posted By: <b>Chris Bland</b><p>I am going to have to back out of this one - too many red flags. I guess its one of those times where its too good to be true (my first thought when I won it for that price - if it were real and period it would have had a lot more interest).<br /><br />Thanks to David for his emails to me about the item and to all of you who chimed in with your insight; you guys really helped me out.<br /><br />Chris

Archive
04-05-2007, 01:59 PM
Posted By: <b>Dave F</b><p>I would back out as well..however, to avoid a possible negative I would offer the seller at this point to pay for seller fees. Don't know what else you could really do.

Archive
04-05-2007, 02:12 PM
Posted By: <b>davidcycleback</b><p>As the seller's description has clear, unarguable errors (1928 date, folder original part of photo), it's reasonable for a bidder to take back bids. If a bidder discovered a seller misdated a baseball card by 11+ years or the 'original' box for the toy is not original, it would be fair enough for a bidder to take back a bid. It's the responsibility of the seller to get the material facts correct.

Archive
04-05-2007, 02:14 PM
Posted By: <b>chris bland</b><p>I am going to offer to pay his seller fees plus a little extra for his trouble. I dont think he is being dishonest, i am sure he doesnt know any better what it really is than I do. <br /><br />If I have to take a negative, I can live with that moreso than the hit to my pocketbook...

Archive
04-05-2007, 02:21 PM
Posted By: <b>davidcycleback</b><p>I sort of got the impression that the seller innocently bought the Wagner and Gehrig <br />at an antique store or flea market or such. I notice he lives in NY<br />State. Of course, innocent or not, anyone can look up and see when Wagner<br />played. And most would figure out that "Original 1928" and "image from 1917 or<br />before" are mutually exclusive. I know Chris figured the seller simply had the wrong <br />year, but it makes you wonder how the seller figured 1928 was the year. Even if<br />the cabinet was original, 1928 would be a strange choice. Most sellers, photo experts<br />or not, would assume it dated to 1917 or before.

Archive
04-05-2007, 02:26 PM
Posted By: <b>Greg</b><p>I believe the photo is the same one used on well known rare pinback that says "Honus Wagner for Sheriff".

Archive
04-05-2007, 02:31 PM
Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>If you and the seller agree not to complete the transaction ebay will refund the fees. If there are inconsistencies in his auction, or misrepresenting an item you are in the right, and dont have to complete payment, and wont be found of any wrong doing in a dispute.

Archive
04-05-2007, 03:09 PM
Posted By: <b>Denny</b><p>A Pocketbook!? <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> (justa jokin')<br /><br />Life's Grand,<br />Denny Walsh

Archive
04-05-2007, 03:15 PM
Posted By: <b>Kyle</b><p><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150106389992&indexURL=3&photoDisplayType=2#ebayphotohosting" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150106389992&indexURL=3&photoDisplayType=2#ebayphotohosting</a><br /><br />

Archive
04-05-2007, 03:16 PM
Posted By: <b>Steve f</b><p>Maybe it's the European Carry-All.