View Full Version : How did this get a PSA 4
Archive
12-24-2006, 08:02 AM
Posted By: <b>RA</b><p><hr color=red><hr color=blue><br /><b><A href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120066613116&sspagename=ADME:B:AAQ:US:1">How did this get a PSA 4</A></b><br /><hr color=blue><br /><hr color=red>
Archive
12-24-2006, 08:37 AM
Posted By: <b>Dylan</b><p>if its the borders you refer to this is common in this set and T205. I think that that is taken into consideration when grading by psa <br />edited: now that i take a closer look, wow they missed that! i really have lost all respect for psa graded cards. I cant beleive their grades are so respected in our hobbies marketplace. Come on! i could never see sgc missing that
Archive
12-24-2006, 08:39 AM
Posted By: <b>RA</b><p>No I'm referring to the 1910 P. written on the card.
Archive
12-24-2006, 08:39 AM
Posted By: <b>ErlandStevens</b><p>I think it's the writing that is the issue.<br /><br />Maybe PSA thinks that neat writing in pen does not detract from the card.
Archive
12-24-2006, 09:24 AM
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>PSA thought the card came that way, with the writing on it, and therefore didn't deduct for it. If they had known then it would have an MK or be downgraded about 2 grades, imo.....
Archive
12-28-2006, 06:48 AM
Posted By: <b>Richard</b><p>Hello, do you think pencil on the back of a card would be as bad as pen with regards to PSA grading?<br />Happy New Year
Archive
12-28-2006, 07:22 AM
Posted By: <b>Frank Wakefield</b><p>Maybe a better question is how did it get bid up to $158.
Archive
12-28-2006, 07:59 AM
Posted By: <b>Dylan</b><p>Obviously someone may have bought the slab and not the card anyways