View Full Version : 1940 play ball joe jackson
Archive
11-05-2006, 04:33 PM
Posted By: <b>brock</b><p>Hi<br />Can any body tell me if this Joe Jackson looks like a reprint. I'm not to good with vintage baseball cards. Thanks for the help<br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1162686706.JPG"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1162686689.JPG">
Archive
11-05-2006, 04:41 PM
Posted By: <b>steve f</b><p>I checked this a few days ago. Looks bad.
Archive
11-05-2006, 04:45 PM
Posted By: <b>Cat</b><p>It's a reprint/fake in my not so humble opinion.<br /><br /><br><br>________________<br /><br /><a href="http://www.audiocomedy.net/soundboards/jacket.shtml" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.audiocomedy.net/soundboards/jacket.shtml</a>
Archive
11-05-2006, 04:45 PM
Posted By: <b>brock</b><p>Thanks you saved me some money.
Archive
11-05-2006, 05:04 PM
Posted By: <b>jay behrens</b><p>cropping looks wrong and picture is way too fuzzy<br /><br />Jay<br><br>I love pinatas. You get to beat the crap of something and get rewarded with candy.
Archive
11-05-2006, 05:25 PM
Posted By: <b>Sean Coe</b><p>It is a fake and not a very good one.
Archive
11-05-2006, 07:12 PM
Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>looks OK to me.
Archive
11-05-2006, 08:31 PM
Posted By: <b>Gilbert Maines</b><p>If the card looks like the scan in this thread, the card is fake. Gum Inc. produces a professional grade product.<br /><br />If you wish to see a real 1940 Playball Jackson, look at the one in Vintage Card Prices.
Archive
11-05-2006, 09:56 PM
Posted By: <b>Judge Dred (Fred)</b><p>The scan is pretty fuzzy. It's a bit difficult to tell from this scan. I'd ask the seller for a hi resolution scan of the card. There could be a bargain awaiting you.
Archive
11-06-2006, 05:36 AM
Posted By: <b>Steve M.</b><p>Might be a crappy scan. I agree that you should ask for a better one.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1162733622.JPG"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1162733643.JPG">
Archive
11-06-2006, 06:43 AM
Posted By: <b>jay behrens</b><p>I doubt it is the scan. If you look at the type, it's pretty clear. No real fuzziness to it. The picture part of it is very, very fuzzy. If it was a bad scan, both of these should be equally fuzzy.<br /><br />Jay<br><br>I love pinatas. You get to beat the crap of something and get rewarded with candy.