So who's going to pony up for Pete Hill? [Archive]

Archive

04-27-2006, 05:44 AM

Posted By: ChadIf you went to the owner of the card--not Ryan, btw--and tried to deal for the card, 200K is the minimum you'd have to pay, I'd guess. I'm sure he's just as happy with keeping the card as he'd be with selling it. There are only 2 Pete Hill cards extant, and only one copy of each card and this Cabanas card is by far the better of the two. As for rather having Cobbs, Mattys, Ruths, etc., we each have our own obsessions. I'd rather have the Pete Hill. It's a great card as it represents not only the coming explosion of baseball in Latin America, but also the card is emblematic of the series when black players proved they were every bit as talented as their white counterparts. The Cabanas set was issued to commemorate the Tigers tour of Cuba and Jose Mendez, Pete Hill and Bruce Petway starred for the Cuban team that gave the Tigers all they could handle. In fact, after the series, Cobb swore he'd never again play against black players and he never did. It was a crucial series in the history of baseball and that there are cards of it is a small miracle, IMO. This isn't to knock Cobb cards or Matty cards--my T205 and T206 Mattys are two of my favorite cards and I'd never part with them and I'd really love to have a V100 Cobb if I can ever save up the scratch--but I'm just trying to give some idea about why the 200k asking price isn't insane. And I haven't even mentioned that Pete Hill was a great player, one of the early black superstars along with Louis Santop and Home Run Johnson and a mainstay on the Chicago American Giants, the New York Yankees of the nascent Negro Leagues and also the barnstorming circuit at the time. Hell, if the Hill were my card, I'd want more than 200k for it. --Chad

Archive

04-27-2006, 08:31 AM

Posted By: RobertIn just my opinion if practically no one on this board knows of Pete Hill and have to do a search in order to find out. I seriously doubt that Mr. Christoff is going to get any bids on a card that practically nobody knows about. The Reccius Wagner is at least known about and also one of a kind as far as we know for the time being and it won't come close to those kind of dollars. Personallt I have no interest in a Pedro Hill baseball card.

Archive

04-27-2006, 09:04 AM

Posted By: ChadThe card is a consigment, it's not Ryan's card. 200k is the minimum the OWNER OF THE CARD wants for it. If it doesn't sell, it doesn't sell. That people on this board know of or don't know of Pete Hill is not a reflection of Hill's greatness as a player or his historical importance or the importance of the card. Those of us who do care about the Negro Leagues or Latin baseball, or the history of baseball as a world phenomenon know how cool this card is. There are more of us than you may think. --Chad Johnson

Archive

04-27-2006, 09:37 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisSerious question: Let's say the owner has someone bid on the card for him and it sells for $200,000 and returns back to the owner. The owner (through the buyer) has to pay $30,000 to Ryan... but has he actually "made money" by setting the market value of a $75,000 card that he still owns at $200,000??

Archive

04-27-2006, 09:53 AM

Posted By: James FeaginIt's not a reflection of the player, but a reflection of name recognition, which leads to price. I personally could care less about such a card. I appreciate their talent, but for my collection, Japanese and Cuban cards are compliments, not a centerpiece.

Archive

04-27-2006, 10:18 AM

Posted By: Gilbert MainesHal, you have asked this "strategy and price setting tactics" question applicable to other low population cards. The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind; for no one can know what the motivation of the seller is, with certainty. My guess is that the seller may have acquired the card for far less than the $75K value which you speculate, and currently will only part with the card for his price. No tactics, just facts. From the sound of this thread, my interpretation is that the Hill card in question is held by a collector with sufficient love for the history, complimented by deep enuff pockets to obtain this card whenever he did. Perhaps recognizing initially if Hill ever made the Hall, there could be a relative bonanza. But is now in the trap of holding a rare, desireable, and valuable card and not really needing to cash it in. And not really wanting to either. No strategy, just feelings. But seriously, if I knew anything, Id be holding the card right now.

Archive

04-27-2006, 10:40 AM

Posted By: ChadThere's no funny business going on. The owner just doesn't want to part with the card and has set a price so that if he does have to part with it, it was an offer he couldn't refuse. The only way it sells if there is somebody out there who loves the card as much as he does AND has the discretionary cash to make a bid. That's a real small subset of people. I love the card but don't have the cash, like most of the other people who lvoe the card. Those with the cash, well, a lot of them probably would rather have a whole crapload of Hutchison Communications stock or a Monet, or whatever. We are weirdos, you know. <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> --Chad

Archive

04-27-2006, 10:46 AM

Posted By: Gilbert MainesI think a lot more simply than you give me credit for, Chad. If I was to buy that Hill card - that would amount to over 6000 cases of beer that I couldn't drink. Now who in their right mind would sacrifice 6000+ cases of beer for any baseball card? Ooops, did I say that out loud?

Archive

04-27-2006, 10:49 AM

Posted By: ChadThat is a lot of beer. But, if I had enough money to pay 200k for a card, I'm guessing I'd still have enough money to keep myself in beer. Oh, who am I kidding. If I had $230,007.00 that card would be mine. I'd have just enough left over for a six pack! --Chad

Archive

04-27-2006, 11:48 AM

Posted By: MarkSo long as these negro league hof cards (aside from the Gibsons) continue to be sold almost exclusively in non-competitive avenues - private sales and auctions with extremely high minimum bids - it's hard to tell what they might sell for in a competitive bidding situation. There's no precedent for what most of the cards in Ryan's auction are worth post-induction announcement, so why not start them all at a dollar and let the market forces decide? Otherwise, the winner takes a huge risk that he would not be able to get his money back when it comes time to sell. Someone who wins the Pete Hill, for example, can only be assured that the card would sell on ebay for somewhere between $30k and $230k. That risk is not present in the case of high-dollar cards sold in REA or Mastro because (i) it's a competitive bidding situation so the winner knows that someone was willing to pay one increment less and (ii) nearly all these cards either have a track record or are similar enough to cards that do have a track record that there is some consensus among collectors as to the cards' value.

Archive

04-27-2006, 11:51 AM

Posted By: warshawlawMortgage the house, do whatever, to get it, because it is worth a heck of a lot more. Which brings me back to the answer to the inquiries on this post: If the card is "worth" $230K+ in the eyes of a collector, someone will pony it up. It is all about perceptions. IMHO, it is not yet worth that much money (if it indeed ever reaches that level); I'd rather have any of a number of other cards (T206 Wagner or Plank, Baltimore News Ruth, T210 Jackson, 1948 Leaf Rocky Graziano, certain 19th century early cabinets, etc.) than the Hill card. Just my preference, so don't jump all over me, guys, but I think my preference is shared by the vast majority of the vintage collectors out there. Which isn't to say that someone might not want to buy the card, but I don't think right now is it. Frankly, if I was buying on a six-figure budget right now I'd rather make a serious run at the Josh Gibson autographed PC; what a card!

Archive

04-27-2006, 12:12 PM

Posted By: ChadI sure don't think it will and I don't think the seller does either, which will be a relief to him. I WOULD buy it if I could. Do I think everyone should feel this way? No, I don't and, frankly, it's a relief that not all of you guys dig the same stuff I do because I don't need the competition. I wouldn't pay six figures for a Wagner, but I understand why people do and respect their ambitions. I don't feel the need to jump into every T206 Wagner post or the Reccius Wagner posts and tell everyone I wouldn't pay X for that card. When it comes to the Negro League/Latin stuff, people sure aren't shy about jumping in and proclaiming their indifference. When I post about the Negro league/latin cards, I figure I'm posting for the people on the board who collect/admire/are interested in the cards. They are vintage, no? I don't post about them excessively, I think. I really love them and, after 10 years away from the hobby, my discovery that there were real live cards of Hilton Smith and Quincy Trouppe and Oscar Charleston, something I used to daydream as a kid about, that these cards exist and could be bought was a revelation. I own a Martin Dihigo card and 3 years ago I didn't think that was possible. All right, I'm officially off on a tangent. Need beer. Where's Gil when you need him? --Chad

Archive

04-27-2006, 12:41 PM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanHal, is there soemthing you want to get off your chest?

Archive

04-27-2006, 12:51 PM

Posted By: Gilbert MainesChad, you are doing just fine; educating many of us who do not fully grasp the history, passion and skill of these past heros, rogues, and survivors. It seems a little ironic to hear the lament that the best cards these players who were denied mainstream exposure, are not typically offered in mainstream auctions. This too will come around, Im sure.

Archive

04-27-2006, 12:52 PM

Posted By: Hal LewisNo, not at all. I am just worried about a "bubble" in our hobby... and I think it will be inflated even faster if more cards are sold in situations where the entire "marketplace" is not involved. On the flipside, I own a lot of cards, so I probably do better financially if the bubble continues to grow!! Obviously the two recent "open" auctions for the T210 Jackson cards show that the $180,000 bids on the "private reserve" EBay auction were bogus. Thus, any "misconceptions" as to the value of that card have come and gone... but I know FOR A FACT that some folks in the interim were offered the chance to buy a T210 Jackson for the "bargain" price of $150,000. I have no problems at all with the Pete Hill card... except that I would like to know who the owner is so that we can find out later if he bought the card from himself.

Archive

04-27-2006, 02:02 PM

Posted By: ChadThe owner has posted the card several times on the board. A quick search of past posts should turn his posts with scans of the card up. --Chad

Archive

04-27-2006, 02:11 PM

Posted By: Robert ZimmermanHow were these cards distributed?

Archive

04-27-2006, 02:14 PM

Posted By: ChadJust like T cards. --Chad

Archive

04-27-2006, 02:15 PM

Posted By: Robert ZimmermanIs this card in particular a shortprint?

Archive

04-27-2006, 02:23 PM

Posted By: ChadAs far as I know. Other cards in the set are floating around, but the card of Pete Hill is the only one extant. Somebody should correct me if I'm wrong, tho. --Chad

Archive

04-27-2006, 03:44 PM

Posted By: Ryan ChristoffHal, Eff you and your accusations. Just because you shill the prices up on stuff you consign doesn't mean everyone else does as well. -Ryan

Archive

04-27-2006, 04:15 PM

Posted By: PaulHow did we suddenly turn to a discussion of the first female Hall of Famer?

Archive

04-27-2006, 04:47 PM

Posted By: Mark"Effa Manley co-owned the Newark Eagles with her husband Abe Manley, whom she married in 1935. She ran the business end of the team, handling scheduling, travel, payroll, promotions, contracts and all the other daily details, from 1936-1947."" Paul, what better day to discuss Effa than Administrative Professionals Day?

Archive

04-27-2006, 06:19 PM

Posted By: RhysRyan I dont think Hal was saying your auction is crooked as we all know you run a clean business and offer the best stuff from your niche in the Hobby. I think he would have made the same comment had it been any auction house offering this card for sale given what someone recently attempted to do with that T210 Jackson. He is not saying that there IS going to be a problem, just that somebody could theoretically do what he mentioned with shill bidding and attempt to raise the value of the card for a future sale. Consequently, if the owner of the card is known to several people in the hobby, it does not seem likely that this would happen. I am sure the owner is just like the rest of us. I am pretty sure that EVERY piece of sports memorabilia is for sale at a price, he has just set the price at what he would be willing to let the card go for. Also Ryan, why was Esteban Prats not given more consideration for the Hall? Everything I can find points to the direction that he was a great player but I saw no mention that he was even a topic of conversation among the recent Hall candidates, but I have yet to see any career statistics for him. Rhys

Archive

04-27-2006, 07:40 PM

Posted By: Hal LewisRyan: I am in no way accusing you of being "part" of the plot. If someone consigned a card to Mastro... and then had their friends bid it up to $200,000 so that they could win it back... THE AUCTIONEER IS NOT DOING ANYTHING WRONG. If the original owner of the card (who is also the after-auction owner) wants to pay $30,000 in "buyer's fees" to pull this off... I DON'T THINK HE IS DOING ANYTHING WRONG EITHER. That's why I was asking seriously whether anyone knows of anyone who has ever done this and successfully sent the market value of a rare card through the roof??? Are you going to deny, however, that you and the owner of the card are not good buddies??

Archive

04-27-2006, 07:46 PM

Posted By: Frank EvanovTo put this in perspective, here's a hypothetical: If this guy who no one has ever heard of, is worth $230K, what if a 1 of 1 card was "discovered" of a true star like Josh Gibson? What would that be worth? [hint check out lot #4 in REA]. Frank

Archive

04-27-2006, 07:49 PM

Posted By: David VarghaAs Hal would quickly tell you Frank, that is a postcard. DavidVargha@hotmail.com

Archive

04-27-2006, 07:53 PM

Posted By: Ryan ChristoffHal, I disagree with you that the consignor wouldn't be doing anything wrong if he decided to shill the card up. Whether he pays the buyer's premium or not, it's still shill bidding. It's still bidding on your own item. It's still wrong. Perhaps we just have different opinions regarding ethics within the hobby. Why do you think the opening bid is so high? It's because that's the very least the current owner would consider selling the card for. It has nothing to do with any objective "market" for the card. It has nothing to do with the "value" of the card. It simply means if someone wants the card, that's the very least it will cost to own it. And yes, I'm good friends with the consignor. What exactly is your point? I'm much better off taking consignments from people I know and trust, people who would never consider the kind of ideas you regularly scheme up, than from people like you who see no problem in bidding on their own items as long as their willing to pay the buyer's premium. Incidentally, every single item in my auction that is on consignment will be noted as such in the auction description. -Ryan

Archive

04-27-2006, 07:55 PM

Posted By: Ryan ChristoffFrank, That Hill guy who no one has heard of is a member of the same Hall of Fame those Ruth and Cobb guys are. -Ryan

Archive

04-27-2006, 08:00 PM

Posted By: Hal LewisRyan: Where do you think that I have ever shill bid an item of mine up? I don't even think I have ever even SOLD an item on EBAY... and can't bid on my own items in Mastro, Lelands, REA... and wouldn't anyways. NOTE: It is NOT "shill" bidding if you are going to keep bidding until you WIN the item. The only way it would be "shill" would be if you were driving up someone ELSE and then making them pay more for the item. If someone is CRAZY enough to pay $30,000 FOR THEIR OWN CARD... you think that is "morally" wrong? I don't. I just think it is MENTALLY wrong.

Archive

04-27-2006, 09:39 PM

Posted By: Frank Evanov"Frank, That Hill guy who no one has heard of is a member of the same Hall of Fame those Ruth and Cobb guys are. -Ryan" Gee, Ryan thanks for that info! BTW, he's still the guy no one has heard of. Frank

Archive

04-27-2006, 10:56 PM

Posted By: jay behrensIf no one has ever heard of him, then how can he have been elected to the HOF? Jay I like to sit outside, drink beer and yell at people. If I did this at home, I would be arrested. So, I go to baseball games and fit right in.

Archive

04-27-2006, 11:32 PM

Posted By: Mark"Why do you think the opening bid is so high? It's because that's the very least the current owner would consider selling the card for. It has nothing to do with any objective "market" for the card. It has nothing to do with the "value" of the card." Ryan: As a hof collector, it's quite disturbing to read that the minimum bids in your auction bear absolutely no relation whatsoever to your assessment of fair market value. If I understand you correctly, if someone were to win Hill and flip it on ebay, the winner might realize a mere fraction of the $230k+ he or she paid. In your own words, you are permitting consignors to set minimum bids that you feel exceed fair market value, and you are the foremost authority on the fair market value of these cards. That is not how other bb card auction houses - REA, Mastro, Lelands, etc, - operate. Other auction houses establish opening bids at less than fair market value. If you are going to operate fundamentally differently from other bb card auction houses, shouldn't you warn collectors who might be spending 10k or 35k or 230k on one card that the minimum price they're paying may exceed fair market value?? Mark

Archive

04-27-2006, 11:51 PM

Posted By: ramramMark - Many people that consign establish an unseen reserve, for their item, at a price at which they are willing to sell. I don't see this as any different. Rob M.

Archive

04-27-2006, 11:56 PM

Posted By: Bottom of the NinthMark The fair market value of any collectible, almost anything for that matter, is determined solely on the price someone is willing to pay for that item at that particular time. The process is entirely subjective and values are constantly changing. There are no laws or ordinances that dictate what something is "worth." It is entirely a free market when it comes to this stuff. Not that I have any interest in defending Ryan but I am not sure I understand your logic. If the card does not sell for 200k plus the hammer then we can conclude that the item is not worth that right now, maybe ever, contrary to what the consignor feels or thinks. Greg

Archive

04-28-2006, 12:17 AM

Posted By: jay behrenseBay is not the perfect free market analytical tool. All is does is show you what the market value is, onne bid incriment higher than the second highest price someon is willing to pay. As a buyer, I like that. It means that I don't have spend the maximum amount I willing to spend on an item. Before eBay is something of a guessing game. Set a price high enough that the card will not be sold immediately, but within a reasonable amount of time. When I used to do shows, I'd put items from my personal collection on the table all the time. Items I had no real interest in selling, I would silly prices on. Evenw ith silly prices, once in awhile some items would get sold. I used to own a 1951 Millers jersey #24. Sadly it wasn't Mays' as he wore a different number. Still, I liked the jersey and people thinking it might be his. I had it at a show in San Fran. A guy asked my how much I wanted for it. I said $2500 and the guy didn't bat an eyelash. I told him it wasn't Mays' jersey. He said he didn't care. He wanted it so he could lie to his friends that it was Mays'. The jersey was worth maybe $150-200 at the time. Right now, I wouldn't sell my Thorpe for any price. When was the last time an m101-5 Thorpe was sold? Jay I like to sit outside, drink beer and yell at people. If I did this at home, I would be arrested. So, I go to baseball games and fit right in.

Archive

04-28-2006, 12:48 AM

Posted By: JimBI agree with Greg. Ryan is under no obligation to run his auctions in the same way Mastro or REA do with low minimum bids. He may or may not be making a wise business decision, but it is his choice. I don't follow the market in the cards he specializes in so I really don't know. If he is willing to put that kind of minimum bid on an item because that is what the conisigner wants, that is his perogative. And if there are consequences from that, he will deal with them. My suggestion to offer a much lower minimum bid earlier in this thread was based on limited knowledge and the presumption that the seller was eager to sell the card. THat does not seem to be the case, at least not at a price under 230k. JimB

Archive

04-28-2006, 12:58 AM

Posted By: MarkGreg - I don't believe I said there are any laws or ordinances mandating Ryan set his minimum prices at or below fair market value. I was just suggestintg that (i) he may want to point this out since it's different from what other bb card auction houses do; and (ii) as a buyer, it's frightening to hear him say I might buy a card from his auction and only recoup pennies on the dollar. Just my openions. But hey, it's America..and it's caveat emptor.

Archive

04-28-2006, 01:25 AM

Posted By: Ryan ChristoffMark, For the most part, your understanding of the situation is correct. I'll try to address some of the points: As far as the minimum bids in my auction bearing absolutely no relation whatsoever to my assessment of fair market value, which items are speaking of? If you're talking about the Pete Hill, it's a waste of time to discuss "fair market value" since it's a one-of-a-kind card and cards like that are worth what they sell for. You are correct that if someone paid $230k+ the winner might realize a mere fraction of that if they tried to flip it on ebay. If you are thinking about bidding on the Hill in order to flip it on ebay for a profit, I would strongly recommend you reconsider your strategy. My guess is, if it sells it will be to another collector who plans to keep it. The only reason I don't own the card myself is that I cannot afford it. Is it "worth" what the minimum bid is set at? In my opinion, yes. I realize there are only a handful of collectors that would agree with me. Most, like you, will consider this an outrageous price and voice that opinion by not bidding on it. Oh, and also by posting about it. Yes, many will voice that opinion by posting about it. If you're talking about another lot, let me know which one. Regarding me permitting consignors to set minimum bids, that is also true. That's the only reason you and other collectors have the opportunity to own the Pete Hill. There are many HOF collectors out there. Those who are trying to obtain one card of every player in the Hall, need this card. One of the reasons it was so important for the card to be in this auction is that there is a card of EVERY single Negro Leaguer in the HOF who has a card. Every one of them. There has never been an auction even remotely similar to this and for this to happen, Pete Hill had to be there. Every HOF collector may complain that the price is too high, but they can't complain that they never had a chance to complete their collection. One collector could knock EVERY Negro Leaguer off their list in one auction. I realize the other auction houses do not generally allow their consignors to set the minimum bids. But I do. At least for this auction. Once the auction descriptions are up you'll be able to see exactly which items are on consignment and which ones are mine. If you need a warning that I operate fundamentally differently from other bb card auction houses, consider this to be that warning. That's not a bad thing, by the way. I'm not sure what you would consider to be "fair market value" for a Cabanas Pete Hill, but if it's less than 200k and you're hoping to pick one up, just wait for one to pop up on ebay. Then you can pay "fair market value" for it. -Ryan

Archive

04-28-2006, 04:40 AM

Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)Just out of curiosity - What would this Hill card be worth if he wasn't in the HOF? What was the valuation on the card 1 year ago?

Archive

04-28-2006, 05:16 AM

Posted By: David VarghaPete Hill . . . The black Bid McPhee of the card collecting world. DavidVargha@hotmail.com

Archive

04-28-2006, 05:24 AM

Posted By: Peter_SpaethI don't see why it's Ryan's or any seller's obligation to tell potential buyers what they think a card is worth. This in my opinion is a completely honest transaction: here is the price, if you think it's worth it, bid. Seems a lot more straightforward than the practices of hidden reserves, running bidders up, not disclosing material alterations, not disclosing authenticators' ownership interest in consigned items, etc.

Archive

04-28-2006, 05:57 AM

Posted By: ChadI regret the way I started it. I just wanted to talk shop about the Negro League cards up on Ryan's auction and was using the Hill card as a means of starting the conversation. Clearly, that was a mistake. I hope it doesn't deflect attention away from the fact that it's an amazing collection of cards up for grabs. Lloyd, Charleston, Willie Foster!, etc. Great players and great cards. --Chad

Archive

04-28-2006, 06:48 AM

Posted By: leonI don't think it was a bad idea to start this topic/thread. Anytime a high profile vintage baseball card comes up for auction it is fair game to talk about. I think some of the explanation that Ryan gives is excellent. We all, including myself, have some cards we wouldn't sell below a certain price. Actually, I have no issue whatsoever about the way the auction is being handled. It's up front and out in the open. There are many major auction houses (dare I say "most") that let folks bid on their own items, and if they win, they pay the vig and keep the item. I am sort of on the fence about it but, since someone else could bid for you anyway, lean towards being upfront and stating it's ok. Again, I don't really think it's ok but otherwise we just have a deception game. ....regards

Archive

04-28-2006, 07:18 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisEveryone assumed that I was "accusing" Ryan, which I was NOT. All I was doing (and am still doing) is asking for an answer to my question: Does ANYONE know for sure of an instance where someone bought their own card (either directly or through a friend) and REALLY PAID the juice just to get their own card back -- in an effort to raise attention, market price, etc.?? OR... LEON, are you saying that some Major Auction have hidden reserves, where the auction house itself will bid up the item and if it does not sell, give it back to the owner?? If so, what is in it for the auction house? Just the possibility that it will sell and they will get juice. In THAT case, it is MUCH DIFFERENT and is definitely illegal shill bidding. I don't think it is illegal or unethical to pay to get your own card back. Why would it be? Dumb, maybe, but why "wrong"?

Archive

04-28-2006, 07:28 AM

Posted By: leonI am not saying auction houses bid on items. I am saying that I have been told by principals of some of the largest auction houses that I could bid on my item and if I win it I will pay the buyers vig. I get kind of an ambiguous feeling about bidding on my own item...that's all. Like I said before it's probably the best to just make it public that it can happen rather than pull an ostrich act and stick your head in the sand ....

Archive

04-28-2006, 07:40 AM

Posted By: SteveI don't think it is illegal or unethical to pay to get your own card back. Why would it be? Mr.Lewis, Earlier you stated that it could be done to establish a market in a card. Thereby influencing a 3rd party to think it was indeed 'worth' X In this way IMO I feel it would be unethical. Not illegal. This exact sort of stuff has happened on ebay many times. As for the Pete Hill card it is worth 200.000 to the owner as that is what he is willing to sell it at. What it would sell at in various forms of auctions is anyones guess. Steve

Archive

04-28-2006, 07:46 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisGood Points Steve and Leon. Can I make it CLEAR that Leland's is NOT allowing me to bid on the Reccius Wagner and that I would NOT do so anyways?? I need the money for lights for my son's High School baseball field. Having a card that now has a "set market value" won't let them play any games at night!!!! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> PS - They just finished the season. Here are the stats for the first-half (second half not complied yet): <a href="http://www.maclaybaseball.com/jvstatistics.htm" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.maclaybaseball.com/jvstatistics.htm</a>

Archive

04-28-2006, 07:55 AM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanLeon, perhaps you can buy your own consigned item if you win the auction -- but what if you don't win the auction and you only serve to drive up the final price? Hal, do you know of any instances in which a consigner has done that? Forget someone who won his own auction -- do you know anyone who has bid on their own item and DIDN'T win it? And Hal, while Leland's won't let you bid on your own card, what would stop you from having a friend bid on it for you?

Archive

04-28-2006, 08:24 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisJeff: I guess nothing stops me from having someone bid on the card... except that I would have to pay 17.5% just to get my card back... and... with a card that rare... everyone would know that I still own it and the whole thing would become pretty obvious. PLUS... like I said a while ago... the current bid is WELL BELOW what I paid for the card 2 or 3 years ago ($65,000)... so if I was bidding on it, I'm not doing a very good job of shilling! <img src="/images/wink.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive

04-28-2006, 08:42 AM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanHal, I hear you, but my question is not what would prevent you from winning your card back, my question is, what would prevent you from bidding up your card through proxies - without winning it back? And I don't disagree that if you were shilling you'd be doing a pretty bad job of it as of today, but what if you suspected there were no bidders that bid any higher than what it is at now?

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:03 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisI don't get your question. Are you asking me what would prevent me from having a friend bid up my card and then HOPE that someone else will outbid my friend in the end?? I don't see how anyone could do that and NOT still face the risk of BUYING BACK your own card if NOBODY bids at the end? Again, I need the money for a pet project, and the whole high school baseball team is anxiously watching the auction and rooting for their lights!! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> Thus, if I did not have 100% intention of getting rid of the card, I would have just kept it and sold something else for the money. BUT... I guess there is really NOTHING in ANY auction that can detect when a bidder is actually interested in an item or whether he is simply bidding and buying it because someone asked him to do so. Even at a live art auction at Sotheby's, couldn't a consignor hire an independent bidding agent to go and bid up a painting for him?? Nobody would know who the consignor was, so it would work.

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:08 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisBut anywhere here who is considered a friend of mine is WELCOME to go bid on it NOW!!! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:09 AM

Posted By: Harry Wallace (HW)As far as I know Sotheby's is the only auction house that allows hidden reserves on items. I can see why it is done for million dollar paintings, but it seems silly for baseball cards. Plus it confuses bidders who think that they are bidding agains another real person. Instead they are basically bidding against the consignor's reserve. If you are not going to set a low minimum bid and let the item sell for what the market dictates (like REA, Mastro's, etc.) thein I personally like the way that Ryan is doing his auciton. At least you know the actual reserve. If I was interested in the card, it would piss me off to see the card see the bidding start at $5,000 and then find out it did not sell because it did not meet the hidden reserve. I was not aware of any of the hobby's major auciton housses (REA, Mastro's, Leland s, etc.) that allow the actual consignor to bid on his own item. But they certainly cannot stop you from having your next door neighbor (or hobby friend) bid on the item for you as long as you are willing to pay the fees on both sides.

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:15 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisTo bid on an item this large, I suspect, however, that the 3 Major Auction Houses would require the person to show a lot of credit applications, hobby references, etc. This would rule out me having my neighbor bid on the card. The drunk would actually have to leave his sofa to mail the application, so that would rule him out.

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:19 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisLET ME BE ABSOLUTELY CLEAR: There is NO HIDDEN RESERVE on my Wagner. I want cash, not card... so PLEASE bid if you are interested. I know that there are at least 7 people out there who at one time or another were the "High Bidder" on the card... so after the auction they can vouch for the fact that they were not "Outbid" by some "Max Bid" thing the minute they placed their bids. Again, if I was going to "shill"... I would have two different hobby friends bidding the card up to AT LEAST what I paid for it by now. Right now, I lose $20,000 if it sells... so obviously this is NOT happening. NOR is there any RESERVE. If you want it, please go get it and enjoy it.

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:20 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisPS - Andy Baran can vouch for the fact that I paid $65k to him as the "sales agent" for a mystery seller several years ago.

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:32 AM

Posted By: andy beckeri feel compelled to keep reading this thread.....more drama than the sopranos. jeff, you asked this of hal.... "Hal, do you know of any instances in which a consigner has done that? Forget someone who won his own auction -- do you know anyone who has bid on their own item and DIDN'T win it?" i obviously do not know this for a fact, but i really assume that this goes on all the time. why wouldn't it? also, i will add that i have never consigned anything to a major auction house.

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:33 AM

Posted By: cmokingwhat is going on in this thread? all of a sudden it's turned into an ad for Hal's Wagner?

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:45 AM

Posted By: ChadHas anyone gone and actually looked at it. Forget the Pete Hill for a minute. If you have any interest at all in Negro league stuff, it's just really cool to see all those cards in one place even if you're not/can't bid on anything. The Cool Papa Bell postcard and the Mallorquina sheet are just awesome. It's overwhelming, actually. I love it. --Chad

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:53 AM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanHal, you do seem to protest a lot. Perhaps you can take a polygraph test and post the results on here? I know the former head of the FBI's polygraph division; he can be in Florida by the end of the day with his machine.

Archive

04-28-2006, 09:53 AM

Posted By: James FeaginI have often looked at his auctions. However, my finances have never really jived with when his auction is conducted. I think many of us think these cards are unique and interesting, but otherwise don't really know what to think about them. I like Ryan's auctions, but like them even better when there are some more attainable cards out there. IMHO, a good auction has a high/middle/low-value tier so everyone can be a part of it. For the record, "low-value" is less than $100 in my book.

Archive

04-28-2006, 10:14 AM

Posted By: CatFor the sake of fair play, I did put a bid on Hal's card and was high bidder for about one day (maybe two). Unfortunately Hal, I am done bidding since I have a few cards in REA I need to make a run at.

Archive

04-28-2006, 11:15 AM

Posted By: Bottom of the NinthKing, Should that really shock you? Greg

Archive

04-28-2006, 11:25 AM

Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)Does anyone know the Hill card valuation 2 years ago, a year ago and right before he was given a pass to the HOF? Ryan, you're probably one of the few people that can answer this question. Do you know the last transaction price on this card?

Archive

04-28-2006, 11:42 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisThanks, CAT. Sorry to hear you are out of the bidding! <img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14> Jeff: I am protesting about as much as someone who might lose money would be expected to protest, I guess. If I were shilling, I wouldn't have a care in the world.

Archive

04-28-2006, 11:43 AM

Posted By: leonTherein lies the problem....hypothetically I bid my card to xxxx and am the underbidder....the "winner" has lost some cash. There is no way to stop it though as I could also have a hobby friend do it for me. Back to the Pete Hill card. I don't blame the consignor one bit and applaud the open reserve concept. regards

Archive

04-28-2006, 11:55 AM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanLeon, agreed; that's why the policy of not allowing consignors to bid on their own lots is somewhat specious.

Archive

04-28-2006, 11:58 AM

Posted By: Hal LewisLeon: Do you know if the Major auction houses ever do this (allow sellers to set their own very high reserve)?? I quite frankly relied on Leland's to set the "minimum bid" for my card, as they have more experience in the "psychology" of selling things than I do. Do you think Mastro would have accepted the Reccius Wagner for their auction if I had told them to set a minimum bid of $100,000? I can't remember anything with the big auction houses ever starting that high... and if it did, it was something clearly worth a ton more. It seems sort of a Hobson's Choice if someone is supposed to use a Major Auction house to sell because they have great reputations... but then the process of setting a hidden reserve is blasted when the small auction houses do the same thing (but in the open)? I guess what you are saying is that someone who really does NOT want to sell but will sell only if the "price is right" is out of luck if he wants to use one of the Major auction houses? Or not, I just don't know their practices as well as other might?

Archive

04-28-2006, 12:17 PM

Posted By: Tom BoblittHunt's does (or has done) it...........I have attended a couple auctions where bidding went on and then the lot was not sold due to some behind-the-scenes reserve. Right or wrong, I think most any auction house (save REA per their own statements) would likely take a card valued at $100K with an open reserve (or maybe even unopened). Publicity is everything for these guys. Average lot price, # lots sold, % lots sold, # lots above $10-$20-$50-$100K, etc. Statistics are what drives them. Whether they intend to go public (some have previously done this) or just hype the next auction, those type of lots are very important. And there are houses that will allow consignors to bid on their own lots I believe.

Archive

04-28-2006, 12:25 PM

Posted By: leonTo answer your question(s)I am not sure it's a "yes or no" answer. If your question is "Do auction houses allow the consignor to set their own reserve?" Technically, I think the answer is no. However by letting the consignor bid on their own item (yes, as I said there are at least 3 major ones who have said I could) aren't we doing the same thing....just covertly? Why all the games? I like what Ryan has done for that very reason. I could even see doing it with at least one of my cards if I ever sold it....For me I like to know where I stand on stuff. I know the Pete Hill WILL sell at 200k + the commission. To me that's far better than me giving a card to Ryan's company and then having an agreement to let me bid and win it and pay the juice on it....again, to me it's the disclosure I applaud...Also, I am not saying the auction houses are doing anything illegal or unethical but it is a slippery slope...I am a customer of almost all of the ones I am thinking of so have no moral issue with it....It's an interesting debate.....regards

Archive

04-28-2006, 12:40 PM

Posted By: Cobby33I sell a lot of items on eBay. According to eBay, I am not allowed to bid on my own items, even if I intend to pay myself after winning it. My wife, who also has an eBay account, is not allowed to bid on my items, even if she intends to pay me for them. The same applies to online auctions. If someone wants to set a high reserve and the auction house allows this, great. If not, you take your chances and if you get low-balled, that's one of the perils of listing a card in an auction. I've dealt with it, as I'm sure many others have.

Archive

04-28-2006, 12:40 PM

Posted By: Hal LewisI agree. If I had been "worried" about getting back 100% of my cost on the Wagner... I probably would have lobbied harder for an "Opening Bid" of $65,000. Granted, I fully expected (and still expect) and hoped to get at least that much... but if the market does not bear this out, then all it means is that I overpaid in the beginning. GEE, HOW MANY TIMES HAS THAT HAPPENED! <img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive

04-28-2006, 12:46 PM

Posted By: Cobby33Tell me about it! We've got our fingers crossed!

Archive

04-28-2006, 01:11 PM

Posted By: E, DanielTo take but ONE part of this thread, while it could theoretically work to have someone you know bid UP an item you are selling - just so you could be sure of buying it back if it didn't meet your reserve, or to set a "market" price for it, there seem to be some pretty big ramifications. First, on a $230000 transaction, the consignor would have to move that amount of funds into his "buddy's" account so that it could be paid for..........not sure how the IRS and Bank Manager would feel about that......and the whole thing starts to look like money laundering to me.... Secondly, if the consignor wants to maintain the charade after the sale, he will also still have to front up to the IRS man himself and come up with the capital gains tax amount accrued by "selling" the item. Thirdly, as Hal suggests, then trying to sell it later becomes enormously problematic and the consignor certainly couldn't use the same auction house, or probably any of the big auction houses as the ownership trails of such cards become almost as important as the card itself. I'm not sure the concept really works on large ticket items, and even on smaller items through ebay regular/serious collectors tend to lock away an image in their minds of cards that are interesting - and who is selling them..........not hard to get a really bad reputation that would sink your ability to work with the 'players' in this community who keep alot of the cards moving between hands and creating real demand and inflationary prices. Anyone agree? Daniel

Archive

04-28-2006, 01:25 PM

Posted By: ChadMan, I feel like I'm in one of my Patriot Act seminars at work. I know there's a lot of money at stake, but the cards are way more interesting. Aren't they? --Chad

Archive

04-28-2006, 01:29 PM

Posted By: E, DanielChad, could you supply a link to the auction site or just give me the name of it? I'm not aware of who Ryan is, though everyone else on the site seems to be, and do not know which auctions he runs..... Thanks so much. Daniel

Archive

04-28-2006, 01:37 PM

Posted By: Ben<a href="http://www.cubanbaseballauctions.com/auction.asp" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.cubanbaseballauctions.com/auction.asp</a>

Archive

04-28-2006, 01:38 PM

Posted By: ChadThat's the link. If you link to the old auctions, the descriptions will give you a pretty good background on Latin American cards. --Chad

Archive

04-28-2006, 01:40 PM

Posted By: Hal LewisNo doubt about it. Ryan's auction is chock full of GREAT cards!

Archive

04-28-2006, 01:47 PM

Posted By: SeanLooks like it also has a ghost of Pedro on the back...I think it's cool, 230k cool??? Good luck Hal, I'm pulling for you, it's good to see the money is going towards a worthy cause, but if you need other worthy causes, I'm one. <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> Sean BH

Archive

04-28-2006, 01:52 PM

Posted By: Ryan ChristoffFred, Yes, I do know the last transaction price on the Pete Hill card. I won't give you the exact number, but I can tell you it was substantial, even though it was many times less than the minimum bid in the auction. I can tell you this much, the current owner paid WAY more than ANYONE else on the planet would have at the time. In fact, if I was auctioning the card back then and started it at the price he paid for it, this exact thread would probably have taken place, just with different numbers. Actually, people would be more outraged at the price because back then there was never any talk about the realistic possibility of Pete Hill making the Hall of Fame. I've always thought Hill should be in, and the current owner felt stronger than me, but that's not why he bought the card. He bought it because he's a collector and that's the price he had to pay to get the card, regardless of what the "fair market value" was at the time. Had he sold it on ebay shortly thereafter he would have gotten a fraction of what he paid for it. I probably would have wound up as the high bidder for less than half what he paid for it, maybe a lot less. I don't see this as being any different than when you go back and read hobby publications from 30 or 40 years ago and you can't believe people were complaining about having to pay $10 for a T206 Cobb. The current owner of the Pete Hill paid a "crazy" price to get it. I guess it wasn't so crazy after all, just ahead of its time. Rhys, Esteban Prats was indeed a great ballplayer. So was his brother Miguel. I don't believe either are worthy of being considered legitimate HOF candidates, but something I will never be able to explain is the fact that neither of them are even members of the HOF in their own country!!! Esteban played from 1889 to 1910 and Miguel played from 1888 to 1909. Part of the problem might be that there are no stats for the greater portions of their careers, but they still should both have been no-brainers for the Cuban HOF. Both of them were definite stars and among the top few players of the era. I really like that team photo from Matty McIntyre's collection that you won when it was on ebay. They didn't mention Esteban Prats, but he's an easy one to identify. Do you still have it? Okay guys, you can continue discussing Hal and the Wagner. Sorry for hijacking the thread and talking about something other than Hal's defense of his non-shill bidding and the greatness of the Reccius Wagner. Back to the regularly scheduled programming. -Ryan

Archive

04-28-2006, 01:59 PM

Posted By: E, DanielYou're a scholar AND a gentleman. Now I had better go and learn a little about, well, stuff I don't know about. Daniel

Archive

04-28-2006, 02:02 PM

Posted By: Hal Lewis100

Archive

04-28-2006, 04:04 PM

Posted By: Jeff LichtmanDaniel, money laundering? Huh? Would the bank that the funds be transferred to be on the grassy knoll by any chance?

Archive

04-28-2006, 05:46 PM

Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)Ryan, Thank you for the explanation. It wasn't exactly what I was hoping for but it was more than I expected. That in no way was meant as a knock. Is there anyway to see a scan of the Pete card? Quick question a bit off the topic but something I'd be interested in: are there any 19th Century Cuban cards?

Archive

04-28-2006, 05:50 PM

Posted By: RhysRyan Thanks for the info on Prats. I found that he won a batting title in Cuba once, but could not find any career info on him. I still have the photo from the McIntyre estate. The person selling it did not mention anything about Prats being on it and he is clearly identified on the back as well. Interesting to note that out of all 60-70 photos I won from the McIntyre estate, about 2/3 had writing on the back that were in Matty's handwriting and this photo is the only one I bought that the writing on the back was obviously from someone else, probably the person who took the photo in 1904-05. Prats is on the bottom row, far left. <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1146181710.JPG"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1146181694.JPG">

Archive

04-28-2006, 10:06 PM

Posted By: Daniel BrettaRhys, that looks like the writing on a lot of my McIntyre photos...I always assumed that it was in McIntyre's hand....Maybe his wife's?

Archive

04-28-2006, 10:14 PM

Posted By: RickThere are some old cabinets from the 19th century...as well as some generic trade cards, thats about it.

Archive

04-28-2006, 10:19 PM

Posted By: prewarsportsDan This is a distinct other handwriting than on the back of the others I bought. I doubt very much this was in his wife's hand either. All the photos I had McIntyre identified himself as "Matty", and this is the only one that does not use that identification. Also, McIntyre is spelled "McIntire" on this photo which is incorrect and so I would assume his wife would know how to spell her own last name. I think it is more likely that the snapshots he or his wife took had their notations on the back, but some of the photos in the book were taken by photographers (including some by famous photgraphers) and notated and then given to McIntyre afterwards. Rhys

Archive

04-28-2006, 10:38 PM

Posted By: Daniel BrettaRhys, the photos that I have with writing resembling the same handwriting as your Tampa photo are all taken in Cuba....Of the team in front of the Student Monument, an "old boat", et cetera. Perhaps they were taken by a Tampa teammate of McIntyre's and given to him. Either way I still think that photo collection is one of the more interesting and important finds in the baseball memorabilia hobby in recent years. Your Tampa photo is a neat find...a lot can be learned from this collection.

Archive

04-29-2006, 01:11 PM

Posted By: E, DanielI know, I'm quite certain I grew up watching to much cop and lawyer tv serials.......... I was just thinking, that when you 'buy' something from yourself, and move funds through a number of accounts to do so, it gives the impression of either legitimizing the items ownership because you stole it or came upon it otherwise than buying it, or by moving large amounts of cash through a series of activities and transactions that end with you still having the cash - perhaps you are trying to move 'marked' or ill gotten bills through the banks so as to end up with 'unmarked' or 'safe' money that is not part of a trail........... Again, I know its convoluted and conspiratorial, but somehow thats how the process played out in my head as I was reading the thread! And it was fun daydreaming it out to you guys as well!!! Daniel

Archive

04-29-2006, 07:30 PM

Posted By: SteveDoing that could in fact come back and bite you if such transactions were over 10k each time. The banks send the fed a form I think for all transactions of 10k or more. The problem with buying something from yourself (especially if it is a rare item) is that the people that are willing to buy it will see the trail and put 2 and 2 together. It seems to me to be unethical to do such things. If a person wants to see how much an item would go for then a high reserve would tell them that. They could set a reserve for 300.000 for a card that normally sells for 200.000 (or has not been offered in years) in this manner I see no problem. But to buy it back from yourself to set a base price so others THINK it is worth a certain amount is wrong IMO. Steve