Question about trimmed cards in PSA/SGC pop reports.

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>cmoking</b><p>Does either PSA or SGC put cards they have encapsulated as Authentic (trimmed or otherwise) in their population reports?

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Scot</b><p> I just had my W590 Lou Gehrig graded by psa as authentic. There are no examples graded by them showing in the pop report to date. They post on mondays I'm told, check the pop report then.

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>cmoking</b><p>thanks, that's a good test case. My guess is that it won't show up at all...but it will be interesting to see. THanks.

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Anthony</b><p>Not in PSA- I've got a few (some T3's and T9's and a '67 Maris proof) and none of them show up in the pop reports. <br />They do show up on the registry as 3's.

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Wesley</b><p>Neither SGC or PSA count trimmed or altered cards on their population reports.

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Cat</b><p>I am fairly sure that PSA includes them. Often you will see a given number of cards in the 1 to 10 scale, while the total is a card (or maybe two) higher. The "Authentic" category is what I have believed makes up the discrepancy.

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Anthony</b><p>Not quite. The descrepancy is cards with qualifiers.<br />

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>jay wolt</b><p>"They do show up on the registry as 3's."<br />ANTHONY - I've noticed that too!<br />But the grade weight counts as zero. <br />Which is correct since its below a PSA-1<br />I saw my low grade T3 set dip a notch when I<br />added a John McGraw authentic in it.<br />If it did count as a 3, it would have rose slightly.<br />The important # to me which was accurate was that it<br />added the proper % towards completion...jay

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Cat</b><p><br /><br />Edited for further research