View Full Version : 1922 Wm. Paterson V89s
Archive
03-09-2006, 03:32 PM
Posted By: <b>Anson</b><p>Paul and I have been discussing the two variances of V89 Wm Patersons. I'm curious, do the B&W versions use a different type of stock than the sepias?
Archive
03-11-2006, 09:06 PM
Posted By: <b>Paul</b><p>I guess nobody knows. Or nobody cares.
Archive
03-11-2006, 10:38 PM
Posted By: <b>Brad</b><p>Just a guess... I think your getting 1922 V61 Nelson Chocolates mixed up here with the 1922 V89 William Paterson's I know that the Nelson's have 2 types of cards, type 1 has Old English print on the back, type 2 has a thicker cardstock and no numbers on the front (type 2 is more desirable by %50 cost)<br /><br />I never heard anything about William Paterson card's having difference types of stock, if this is fact like they say in <a href="http://www.oldcardboard.com/foreign/canada/v/v089/v89.asp?cardsetID=1006" target="_blank">Oldcardboard.com </a>"Found in both sepia and black and white printings" its news to me. I don't think there would be any price difference do to the low count of cards. <br /><br /><br />"always looking for 1923 Maple Crispette Cards"<br />
Archive
03-11-2006, 11:14 PM
Posted By: <b>fkw</b><p>I think Anson is asking if the 2 types of V89s (sepia and B&W) have different paper stocks. I would have answered it but Im not sure myself, the only 2 I have at this moment are sepia and they are slabbed so I cant be sure of the thickness and I dont have one of each type to compare. It is a good question though.<br /><br />If anyone didnt know the V89s come in either B&W print or a Sepia (brownish) print.
Archive
03-12-2006, 07:32 AM
Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>I actually had asked this question to myself a few months ago when I picked up the Daubert from the set. I laid the card next to another one I had from the set and could find no difference and then I held each in one of my hands at the same time. By this very unscientific pair of experiments, I would say the two versions are of the same stock.<br /><br />
Archive
03-12-2006, 08:55 AM
Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>Is the sepia tone version clearly different?<br />Does it refer to the photo only?<br />Is the typeface and all other aspects of the card the same as the B&W version?<br />Is this sepia or B&W?<br />Thankshttp://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1142096099.JPG <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1142096099.JPG">
Archive
03-12-2006, 09:03 AM
Posted By: <b>Richard Masson</b><p>OK, I see the difference here:<br />Both are on the same card stock.<img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1142096633.JPG">
Archive
03-12-2006, 09:08 AM
Posted By: <b>Richard Masson</b><p>As an aside, I still need Shawkey, Marquard and Scott to finish the set (shameless plug, sorry, Leon).<br />Here's a few more scans so the post is legit:<img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1142096907.JPG">
Archive
03-12-2006, 10:41 AM
Posted By: <b>Anson</b><p>Paul, if you could post up your Heilmann for comparison. It looks as if these B&Ws have substantial stock like the E120s etc.
Archive
03-12-2006, 02:52 PM
Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>Actually the card stock reminds me of E121s, semi gloss on the front (finished) and raw on the back.