View Full Version : I have now seen it all
Archive
02-03-2006, 02:50 PM
Posted By: <b>Genaro</b><p>This was in the pre 19030 singles on e bay<br /><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/My-daughter_W0QQitemZ8761014577QQcategoryZ86841QQrdZ1 QQcmdZViewItem" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/My-daughter_W0QQitemZ8761014577QQcategoryZ86841QQrdZ1 QQcmdZViewItem</a>
Archive
02-03-2006, 02:56 PM
Posted By: <b>Judge Dred (Fred)</b><p>The shipping charge is reasonable. Insurance may be a bit high at $12 but there's a full 100% satisfaction guarantee so if the kid doesn't poop and pee correctly you can ship her back for a full refund minus the shipping charges.
Archive
02-03-2006, 03:19 PM
Posted By: <b>DJ</b><p>DON'T BID! THAT'S MY DAUGHTER! HE DOESN'T OWN WHAT HE IS SELLING BUT HI-JACKED MY SCAN FROM WHEN I TRIED TO SELL MY DAUGHTER LAST WEEK, BUT THE RESERVE WAS NOT MET! GRRR..<br /><br />DJ<br /><br />P.S Since she didn't sell, looking for offers...got some EX/EX+ T205 Minor Leaguers you want to trade for? Doesn't poop that much, less than others. <br /><br />Of course, j/k
Archive
02-03-2006, 03:26 PM
Posted By: <b>pete</b><p>isnt she obligated to sell the item (daughter)? hmmm, .99 cents. was there a reserve? do i get the walker with the baby or is it baby only?
Archive
02-03-2006, 03:29 PM
Posted By: <b>Genaro</b><p>I think its very deceptive on his part meaning the dad. I dont think she is vintage so how can she be listed in the pre 1930s she looks like a singles 2005 to me.
Archive
02-03-2006, 03:51 PM
Posted By: <b>Brian E.</b><p>all kidding aside....this auction was for a 1920's Caramel Ty Cobb however the individual had listed it as an E-90. I dropped them a note making them aware of the mistake to which they replied requesting more information. I suspect they temporarly modified the auction with their daughter as a place holder rather than cancelling it or leaving it incorrectly listed. The individual also stated the card didn't belong to them and that they were playing middle man. <br /><br />Brian E.
Archive
02-03-2006, 04:24 PM
Posted By: <b>Genaro</b><p>I knew that I was just having a little fun with it thats all. I wonder how many people have put this on items to watch.
Archive
02-03-2006, 06:39 PM
Posted By: <b>Zach Smith</b><p>With the $1,000,000 shipping charge I'm scared to look at that one much less put it in my watch list. I guess shipping precious cargo has it's price!
Archive
02-03-2006, 08:51 PM
Posted By: <b>Andrew Parks</b><p>She definitely looks a little short - send her to PRO.