PSA 1 revisted [Archive] - Net54baseball.com Forums

Archive

06-25-2005, 09:29 PM

Posted By: CarlHi, I'm an infrequent poster to the board, but as a low grade collector of vintage cards, I do have a great deal of interest in this topic. I also hope it is okay to restart the thread - if not I apologize. It appears to me (and I hope you can follow me) that there is a bigger difference between the most beat up PSA 1 and the least beat up PSA 1 then there is between the best looking PSA 1 card and a typical psa 4 or even 5 - for example, I bought the following card a few months ago for a very fair price (hopefully the link will work) <img src="http://www.houseofcardsmd.com/06jt.jpg">. A pin hole dropped it to a one. I have also seen nicer looking PSA 1's then this. I think in this case, having the card graded actually lowered the potential selling price - I have bought worse looking raw t206's for more money. In terms of what will hold their value better, if you look at percentages, low grade cards appear to be a safer bet. The fair T206 Mordecai Brown card I bought for 25 bucks might lose half it's value (thought I doubt it), but I would lose only 12.50....if it had cost me 300 bucks, I might be out a whole lot more. I live in the Northeast, and though it may not be a good analogy to compare housing and real estate, the mid and low price houses are still selling well, while the homes over 600,00 dollars are sitting on the market longer. I'll always have 50 bucks to throw at a card here and there....will people always be willing to toss out a thousand bucks or more for a high grade common? Take it easy on me, this is my first post of any size. Carl

Archive

06-25-2005, 09:44 PM

Posted By: Josh K.not a 1, but one of the best looking 3's Ive come across (and no, that is not a spot of paperloss on this card): <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1119757029.JPG"> and here is a 1 (sgc 10) that looks pretty good - creasing accounts for the grade, but not too noticable IMO. <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1119757290.JPG"> PS - I hope we can keep this reincarnation on topic.

Archive

06-25-2005, 09:47 PM

Posted By: cn sometimes you have to shake your head when you see a card like this graded a 1 and a creased card a 2 or a 3.

Archive

06-25-2005, 09:48 PM

Posted By: AnsonThank you guys, as I really wanted to discuss this topic in the first place. Both of those cards are astounding for their grades. Without that pinhole, the Tinker would grade a solid 3 and possibly a 4.

Archive

06-25-2005, 10:16 PM

Posted By: Judge DredPSA is really tough on those pin holes. The card could have all the attributes of a MT card but the pin hole automatically drops it to a "1". I've seen SGC grade cards as high as a "2" with a pin hole. After seeing some of the cards in the other PSA1 thread it is quite apparent that a grade of "1" has an obviously wide range of aesthetics. Should a small pin hole automatically lower the grade of a card to a "1"? I've seen paper loss on cards that have been assigned grades of up to "3". I don't understand why PSA makes such a difference between a small pin hole and the loss of paper. It may depend upon the diposition of the grader at the time the card is viewed.

Archive

06-25-2005, 11:24 PM

Posted By: John BarnesThese arent pre war but they are on topic. I submitted these at the same time a couple months back. <img src="http://img225.echo.cx/img225/7906/koufax17bx.jpg"> Clean back <img src="http://img225.echo.cx/img225/1344/jackie15kt.jpg"> <img src="http://img225.echo.cx/img225/4918/jackie24or.jpg"> dirty, taped, and it's written on, and it gets the same grade as the decent presentable koufax. Seems like there needs to be some destinction between fair and poor. John

Archive

06-26-2005, 05:31 AM

Posted By: Keith O'Leary <img src="http://www2.propichosting.com/Images/421573170/103.jpg">

Archive

06-26-2005, 07:11 AM

Posted By: Steve<img src="http://images1.collectors.com/psa/set_registry/m583122/jackie.jpg"> the same 1949 bowman robby in a 2 steve d not sure if I did that correctly.....maid and gardener are off. card had a slight crease in the upper right habd corner that was flattened out by the seller. it presents well. PSA downgrades a card 2 points if that is done.

Archive

06-26-2005, 07:51 AM

Posted By: Chuck RI don't generally buy graded cards (or I release them from their tomb when I do buy them), but as someone who works with numbers at work it seems like the problem here is fairly simple. PSA decided to go with a 10 point system and then tried to cram in a grading scheme that has more than 10 levels. PSA 3,4,5 gives you the nuances of VG, VGX and EX. When you get below that, you really need G-VG, G, Fair and Poor to pick up some of these differences....but you've only got two PSA levels left. Seems to me they should have gone to a 12 point scale: Poor, Fair, G, G-VG, VG, VGX, EX, EXMT, NM, NM-MT, MT, Gem MT.

Archive

06-26-2005, 12:00 PM

Posted By: jay behrensI'd still like see someone use a true 100 point scale breaking the areas into corners, surface, edges, centering and maybe something else. Each area is on a 1-20 scale. Total up the 5 areas for the score. Jay My place is full of valuable, worthless junk.

Archive

06-26-2005, 12:51 PM

Posted By: CarlThe variation between PSA 1's is exactly why I like the grading system. The weakness gives me a chance to get a good looking card for a good price just because it's graded a 1 - break it out of the holder, and it can stand up nicely to a 3 or 4. Since I buy the card, not the holder, it makes sense to me to look for a good 1 rather than a higher grade card (well a 3 or 4 anyway). Of course, if I had unlimited funds at my disposal, I would prefer to get the nicest looking, highest grade card available, but, alas, I don't - Carl

Archive

06-28-2005, 09:33 AM

Posted By: Glen VDon't know how that Schalk card only got a 1. In comparison, I think SCG was a little generous with this one. <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1119972264.JPG">

Archive

06-28-2005, 11:58 PM

Posted By: BcDI have a PSA 1 Washington T-200 team card that is a solid 4 that is unbelievable. They are all over the map on that issue~

Archive

06-29-2005, 08:39 AM

Posted By: JimiThe problem I find with grading is that centering issues count for a whole lot!! I'm looking at some of the cards posted above and am thinking, "man, had some of those had 40/60 centering at least, the grades would be much higher." I never even paid attention to centering until the last couple of years. To me, centering shouldn't deter from the overall grade unless it is a miscut or 0/100. Of course the point in getting that "perfect card" you'd need to get one well centered. I just hate the fact that cards are degraded because of something that happened on the printing press. Someone couldn't cut straight. <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> Jimi

Archive

06-29-2005, 09:27 AM

Posted By: Josh K.In response to the comment above, the schalk is definitely a 1 - their is creasing throughout the bottom half of the card (look below the waist and you will see numerous faint lines - all creases that are not very apparent even when holding the card in your hand). Also some paperloss on the reverse. I just posted it as an example of a nice looking 1.

Archive

07-07-2005, 12:21 AM

Posted By: The TruthTellerI believe that grading is so subjective that you can have a "1" that looks as good as a 3 or 4 if the flaws are not as readily visible.

Archive

07-07-2005, 09:10 AM

Posted By: warshawlawlumping poor and fair together. To me, Poor is basically the equivalent of authenticating the item while Fair means very worn but not destroyed.

Archive

07-07-2005, 10:30 AM

Posted By: Gilbert Maines I'd still like see someone use a true 100 point scale breaking the areas into corners, surface, edges, centering and maybe something else. Each area is on a 1-20 scale. Total up the 5 areas for the score. Jay Ive had enuff with inadequate grading, if you need help count me in.