View Full Version : Another variation: just when I thought my life was simple
Archive
04-20-2005, 01:53 PM
Posted By: <b>warshawlaw</b><p>While looking over the backs of some new 1925-29 PC Back Exhibits I just received I noticed that one says "not to be used in exhibit machines" (just like every other one I've ever had) while the other says "not to be used in exhibit machine". Since both make grammatical sense, there may be a legitimate variation. <br /><br />Does anyone else have one of these cards with the singular "machine" on the back? <br /><br />
Archive
04-20-2005, 02:07 PM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>The two that I just got in the mail today (Foxx rookie and Klein rookie) BOTH say "machines" plural.
Archive
04-20-2005, 02:11 PM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Adam:<br /><br />I thought these were called "1926-29"... but you call them "1925-29"... so do you know something about a player shown on a certain team that makes these date back to 1925??<br /><br />What else do you know about the set?<br /><br />Did ALL of the cards first come out in 1926 (or 1925) and remain available through 1929 without changes or additions to the set??<br /><br />That would seem to be the meaning of the hyphen designation: 1926-29
Archive
04-20-2005, 02:13 PM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>I think I answered my own question:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/k/kleinch01.shtml" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseball-reference.com/k/kleinch01.shtml</a><br /><br />Chuck Klein didn't play at all until 1928... so it is highly unlikely that he appeared on any Exhibit card in 1925 or 1926 or 1927.<br /><br />I guess he was added to the set in 1928.
Archive
04-20-2005, 02:14 PM
Posted By: <b>will watson</b><p>and all of them say "machines"<br /><br />does it appear the S was rubbed or scratched out in some way? or does it appear to be an actual printing omission (ala the '58 Hererra)?
Archive
04-20-2005, 02:18 PM
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>I thought Exhibits aren't cards? You changed your mind? I still love the '25 Gerhig I got in a Mastro years ago.....later
Archive
04-20-2005, 02:18 PM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>On the other hand, Everett Scott retired about halfway through the 1926 season and is INCLUDED in the set...<br /><br />which WOULD indicate that the FIRST cards from this set were issued in 1926.<br /><br />Jimmy Johnston also retired after 1926 and is in the set.
Archive
04-20-2005, 02:25 PM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>AND...<br /><br />Tommy Griffith retired halfway through the 1925 season and is included in the set!!!!<br /><br />This would indicate that some of the first cards from this set were indeed printed in 1925.<br /><br />I think a "1925-29" designation would be appropriate.<br /><br />
Archive
04-21-2005, 09:15 PM
Posted By: <b>warshawlaw</b><p>actually Woody Scharf wrote several on it. Best indications are that the first run started in 25 with changes thru 29 and printings maybe into 30