View Full Version : ebays newest JOE JACKSON rookie...
Archive
03-22-2005, 12:29 AM
Posted By: <b>pete</b><p>item # 5177915302, what do you think about the back?? i dont know the seller but has good feedback...pete-
Archive
03-22-2005, 01:11 AM
Posted By: <b>Bottom of the Ninth</b><p>I think it belonged to Levi Bleam from 707 Sportscards and was purchased within the last 5 months by a guy who posts here, Bresdo. Guess he sold it to this ebay seller.<br /><br /><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5177915302" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5177915302</a><br /><br />There was also this one, which looks very similar.<br /><a href="http://catalog.mastronet.com/index.cfm?action=DisplayContent&ContentName=Lot%20Information&LotIndex=43753&CurrentRow=1" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://catalog.mastronet.com/index.cfm?action=DisplayContent&ContentName=Lot%20Information&LotIndex=43753&CurrentRow=1</a>
Archive
03-22-2005, 04:11 AM
Posted By: <b>steve k</b><p>1909 E90-1 CARAMEL JOE JACKSON <br><br>VERY NICE CARD. NO CREASES. PINHOLES, AND BACK WEAR. <br><br>ALL UNGRADED CARDS ARE AUTHENTIC AND UNTRIMMED. FEEL FREE TO REVIEW MY PAST CARD SALES FOR VERIFICATION. <br><br>Okay - So we'll take his word for all this he mentions and hope that it is all true. But what about recolored, retouched, erased pencil marks, wrinkles, moisture damage, etc., etc? In my view if a card such as this is not graded, then there is most likely if not definitely some problem which is NOT being mentioned.<br>
Archive
03-22-2005, 06:59 AM
Posted By: <b>Judge Dred</b><p>If I were the seller I would have it authenticated by SGC or PSA. Again, this only adds to the perception that the card is "more" real than if it were not authenticated, but at least people might will feel more comfortable bidding on the card. You have to figure a few dollars toward authentication would probably translate into a higher realized sales price. <br /><br />It does look real though. At least it doesn't have those tell tale sign "burnt" edges to make it appear older than it is.
Archive
03-22-2005, 09:17 AM
Posted By: <b>Scott Elkins</b><p>Henry Moses. I haven't bought anything from him in a couple years. However, I was always pleased with transactions involving this seller in the past.
Archive
03-22-2005, 09:28 AM
Posted By: <b>Wesley</b><p>Henry goes by "floridamoment" on ebay. It's "fl_estate_treasures" that is selling the E90-1 JJ on ebay now and I don't know who he is.
Archive
03-22-2005, 09:58 AM
Posted By: <b>rman444</b><p>I saw fl_estate_treasures selling t205's a few weeks back - some graded and some ungraded. I believe a couple of cobbs ungraded and a cy young psa 5 and another gai 5. All were sold I think. Seems to be a good seller.
Archive
03-22-2005, 10:25 AM
Posted By: <b>quan</b><p>good seller, have done many transactions with the guy. doesn't like to deal with graded cards, i was offered this card but passed because of the punchholes.
Archive
03-22-2005, 10:30 AM
Posted By: <b>Robert</b><p>Bottom of the Ninth I never owned this card, so I did not sell it. Just want to get the facts correct. I never buy anyu lower condition cards.
Archive
03-22-2005, 11:05 AM
Posted By: <b>Andy Baran</b><p>I was the consignor of the Jackson card that sold recently in the Mastro Auction. I originally bought the card from Levi Bleam, but that was about 7 years ago.
Archive
03-22-2005, 12:21 PM
Posted By: <b>Bottom of the Ninth</b><p>Sorry Robert. I had the wrong guy. This card was previously owned by a guy named Tom Regos but I still contend that it belonged to Levi within the last 6 months.
Archive
03-22-2005, 05:42 PM
Posted By: <b>Dan Koteles</b><p>being a Jackson collector, the pin hole detraction on such a small card as opposed to the larger Cracker Jack....it overwelms the card....wouldn't be for me.
Archive
03-23-2005, 01:30 AM
Posted By: <b>BCD</b><p>inspector CLUESO OR HITLER??? JACKSON