PDA

View Full Version : Old Judge King Kelly Boston Portrait


Archive
02-05-2005, 10:59 AM
Posted By: <b>Bob C</b><p>I recently picked up a N172 Old Judge $10,000 Kelly Portrait, Bare Head with a Boston Jersey. It is in real nice shape & I cannot seem to locate this pose in the 2005 SCD. I understand the Boston version is more valuable can anyone help?<br />Thanks all.

Archive
02-05-2005, 11:10 AM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p><img src="http://www.lewisbaseballcards.com/classes/baseBallCard/images/543Lg.jpg"><br /><br />Bob: Does yours actually have a BOSTON jersey showing... or does the caption just say "Boston" while he is wearing this Chicago jersey??<br /><br />

Archive
02-05-2005, 11:37 AM
Posted By: <b>Bob C</b><p>Hal,<br />He is wearing a Boston jersey.<br />(nice card btw!)<br />Thanks,<br />Bob

Archive
02-05-2005, 11:43 AM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Wow... I have never seen or heard of an N172 King Kelly BOSTON portrait card... only him standing with his bat or fielding!!<br /><br />PLEASE post a scan of the card...<br /><br />and you may have the only one known to exist!!!<br /><br />Thanks for sharing and not "hiding it"! <br /><br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive
02-05-2005, 11:48 AM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Bob:<br /><br />The Chicago N172 Kelly "portrait" card pictured above is listed in the SCD as being worth TWICE AS MUCH as all of the "Boston" varieties...<br /><br />but that would be completely irrelevant if you have a UNIQUE "Boston" variety that has never been seen! I think it would be worth AT LEAST as much as my Chicago portrait and maybe more!<br /><br />ALSO ... if you are LUCKY enough that your card is a "PLAYERS LEAGUE" card instead of a "National League" card...<br /><br />then it will REALLY be worth a mint!!!!<br /><br />Does your card say "Boston, N.L." or "Boston, P.L." under the photo ??

Archive
02-05-2005, 11:53 AM
Posted By: <b>john/z28jd</b><p>If you check the gfg site on the Oregon find youll see a Boston portrait version of Kelly with no hat as Bob pointed out.Its probably the same version he has.<br /><br />I dont have the price guide to refer to so i cant help you out tho<br /><br /><a href="http://gfg.com/LLojfind/15.shtml" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://gfg.com/LLojfind/15.shtml</a>

Archive
02-05-2005, 11:54 AM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Bob:<br /><br />Here is an auction that ended on one like you are describing:<br /><br /><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=86839&item=5161259392&rd=1#ebayphotohosting" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=86839&item=5161259392&rd=1#ebayphotohosting</a><br /><br />BUT THIS ONE IS NOT REAL. <img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive
02-05-2005, 11:56 AM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Nice find, John!!<br /><br />I wonder if that is where Bob bought his??<br /><br />If so ... then this still may be the only one known??<br /><br />Either way, it is certainly NOT in the SCD Catalog and needs to be ADDED!!!

Archive
02-05-2005, 11:59 AM
Posted By: <b>john/z28jd</b><p>because David has a number to correspond with the Old Judge checklist im going to assume it is a known card just based on the fact he found cards that didnt match up to any listing and he labeled them 123-XX(just an example number) or 123-aX if the pose matched another but not the variation

Archive
02-05-2005, 12:04 PM
Posted By: <b>Bob C</b><p>Hal,<br />Here it is.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.rbcraik.com/ebay/OJKelly.JPG">

Archive
02-05-2005, 12:06 PM
Posted By: <b>Jay Miller</b><p>There are three different Kelly portraits, two with Chicago on the jersey, one with Boston. My experience tells me that they are equally common. Obviously, they are all listed.

Archive
02-05-2005, 12:17 PM
Posted By: <b>Bob Lemke</b><p>The Boston-uniform bare-head portrait card of Kelly has long been recogniez and was cataloged in the "by poses" listings of N172 last time we published that list. When the Hall of Famers were broken out for a separate listing in the 2005 book, the Boston card was overlooked. It will be returned to the Hall of Fame listings in the 2006 edition.

Archive
02-05-2005, 12:25 PM
Posted By: <b>Bob C</b><p>Terry Knouse and other knowledgeable collectors have told me the Boston one is much tougher. Thanks for all of the valuable input, and so quickly. I remain in awe of the combined talent and resources of this board!

Archive
02-05-2005, 12:25 PM
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Well... there you have it!<br /><br />Where else in the World can you go with a question about vintage cards...<br /><br />and have your questioned answered within an hour by:<br /><br />The leading N172 collector in the World...<br /><br />and the EDITOR of the catalog himself!!??<br /><br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />This site rocks!

Archive
02-05-2005, 12:35 PM
Posted By: <b>Julie</b><p>catalogued and known, is rarer than the other two, the beautiful one and the cross-eyed one. I never saw a Boston portrait till half a year ago. You won't find that portrait with "Chicago" on it.<br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/jphotos/BN172K002.jpg"> <br /><br />I know, it's higher up in this thread. I never get tired of it, though...