Erroneous posts

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>jay behrens</b><p>We have the ability here to edit our posts. If you make an error or false assumption in a post, would be that difficult to go back and delete the erronous information?<br /><br />I watching the one thread Lee started asking for an opinion because one person mistakenly thought Lee wanted the cost of getting some cards graded back from a seller, he is constantly having to repeat that this is not the case. If the person making this erroneous post had jsut gone back and delted that part of his post, none of this would be happening.<br /><br />We have the ability to edit our posts, make use of it. Especially if what you posted is wrong and is a major source for a problem that should never have existed in the first place.<br /><br />Jay<br><br>I saw weird stuff in that place last night. Weird, strange, sick, twisted, eerie, godless, evil stuff. And I want in.

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Judge Dred</b><p>Jay,<br /><br />I don't think that the cost of grading the cards should be refunded. The seller was nice enough to offer a full refund. <br /><br />OK, I'm just kidding, don't let it be said that I have no sense of humor - even if it's a bit dry.<br /><br />The "edit" function is a nice tool and it could/should be used to minimize the amount of confusion generated by misunderstood posts. A little clean up can go a long way... <br /><br />

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Joe P.</b><p>"The "edit" function is a nice tool and it could/should be used to minimize the amount of confusion generated by misunderstood posts. A little clean up can go a long way..."<br /><br />Let's go one step foytha. (if we have the time that is)<br />Let's use the delete/edit/correct function on woids that threaten to be close to the Inglish language but aint.<br /><br />BTW, can anyone point me to dis function? <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> <br /><br />

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Julie</b><p>is a godsend. Also, to sneakily correct factual errors you've made before anyone calls you on them!

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>runscott</b><p>...but poor Jay