Archive
04-21-2004, 08:43 AM
Posted By: <b>ramram </b><p><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=50129&item=4126036348&rd=1" target=_new>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=50129&item=4126036348&rd=1</a>
Archive
04-21-2004, 09:04 AM
Posted By: <b>Bill Cornell</b><p>This subject was covered recently here: <a href="http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=153652&messageid=1079277901">A&G/Goodwin Photo</a>.<BR><BR><BR><BR>
Archive
04-21-2004, 12:13 PM
Posted By: <b>hankron</b><p>I was asked to examine three of these proofs for a major auction house. They were these images, except in cabinet form. My opinion was that the photos should not be included in their auction, as I doubted their authenticity. I came to my opinion for a variety of reasons, both general and technical (I examined the paper and the photographic process). A well known and respected person at the auction house had originally examined the photos and had the same opinion, but, I was asked to offer a second opinion. The photos were not included in their auction.<BR><BR>I note that when I post an opinion on the authenticity of specific items, I am careful and conservative in my language. If you were there when I offered my in person five-word verbal opinion, you would know that my opinion on the photos is not weak.<BR>