Joe Jackson E 90-1

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Jim Clarke</b><p>Just getting thoughts on this. I e-mailed the seller with the question if I was to win this auction would he guarantee that the item would grade at PSA/GAI/ or SGC.. This was the response.<BR><BR><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2792757230&category=31718&sspagename=STRK%3AMEBWA%3AIT&rd=1" target=_new>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2792757230&category=31718&sspagename=STRK%3AMEBWA%3AIT&rd=1</a><BR><BR>"I don't know about CSA's reputation but I do know all grading is a matter of opinion not fact (I have seen some totally dubious cards in PSA holders and I <BR>know people who have trimmed cards and got them past PSA, etc.) so I am just not in a position to guarantee you what other companies would do. My understanding is that PSA probably would not grade it due to it being short as described."<BR><BR>My question is:<BR>1. Card is fake/counterfit<BR>2. Real but altered.<BR>3. Real and un-altered <BR><BR>

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Ben</b><p>Real but altered. Definitely trimmed on at least three edges (t,b,r). The card looks real to me though...it shows the off-registeredness typical of that card (red moustache) and the surface/colour look good to me.

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>Cycleback</b><p>How exactly does one assign a 1-10 grade for surface gloss?<BR><BR>"Honey, you might want to powder your nose before the company comes. It looks a bit Minty."

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>petecld</b><p>The card is real but trimmed on the right and bottom edges for sure. <BR><BR>Is the top trimmed too? Yeah, probably.

[Archive]

Posted By: <b>petecld</b><p>Sorry to pull a "hankron" but after a second look I would say the top is trimmed as well.<BR><BR>