PDA

View Full Version : Grading Companies 1-10


Archive
11-15-2003, 06:58 PM
Posted By: <b>George</b><p>I know there was a post about some of the grading companies a while back but I can't find the thread. I have never sent anything to a grading company and with all of the complaints, I am not sure if I should. If you have tobacco cards and regular Topps, etc. which grading company would you use? Would you use one for tobacco cards and one for others, etc. How would you rate the grading companies in rank order(as well as a 1-10 overall ranking), and ones to completely avoid? Thanks for all your input on experiences with grading companies.

Archive
11-15-2003, 07:32 PM
Posted By: <b>David Seaborn</b><p>1. SGC - nobody's perfect, but inmy mind they're the best. Especially when considering vintage material. very friendly too.<BR><BR>2. GAI - Still notvused that much, but clearly gaining momentum and, in my opinion, has passed PSA.<BR><BR>3. PSA - still the giant in terms of numbers, but that's also their downfall. To worried about an assembly line mentality. Poor customer service, much more concerned with modern cards (b/c that's where they can get more submissions = more $$$). their cards still sell a good penny though (more than SGC on some issues like T206's- although they are slipping, less on others like T202's and most caramel cards). Again, only my opinion, although the latter statement can be supported by data.<BR><BR>4&5. SCD & Beckett - just haven't cracked into the vintage market. Much more geared for modern cards. I don't even know if they have the expertise necessary for evaluating the few vintage cards that they have (maybe,I just don't know).<BR><BR>6. You probably don't want any company past the "Big 3" and you certainly don't want any of these. This would include PRO (known for trimmed cards), AAA (I won't vengo there), NASA (ditto),and any other three letter abbreviations.

Archive
11-15-2003, 07:59 PM
Posted By: <b>runscott</b><p>1. SGC - agreed. They have their problems, but they listen when we offer criticism.<BR><BR>2. SCD - so far, so good. The graded cards I've seen have been accurate, and few mistakes (I can't recall any so far). Low profile, but that's not all bad.<BR><BR>3. GAI - I don't like a lot of what they've done, but they are still better than PSA or Becketts. I would prefer their grading scale be the same as PSA and SGC, but I guess they have their marketing strategy and if it works - more power to them. A lot of collectors who I respect use them.<BR><BR>4. Beckett - way too many grading errors and ridiculous marketing experiments.<BR><BR>5. PSA - hey, if you want your cards to have value when slabbed, this company is at the top. I occasionally buy their stuff if the price is right, but I buy the slab rather than the card (just like their customers do), and I try not to look too closely - when I re-sell, I realize that customers are buying the PSA label and couldn't care less what's inside the plastic slab, so I feel no guilt - besides, PSA customers feel that PSA is perfect and would never complain. <BR><BR>6. agreed - waste of time going any lower on the list.<BR> <BR> <BR>

Archive
11-16-2003, 12:23 AM
Posted By: <b>botn</b><p>In terms of accuracy and presentation of the finished product there are only two choices: GAI and SGC. Both are quality companies that will go the extra mile for their customers. They have the best and most qualified graders in the hobby. Nobody else comes close. Each of its customers is given personal attention and nobody is more important than the next.<BR><BR>Both SGC and GAI are well respected for their vintage cards. PSA graded cards will generally sell for a little more, but only due to the Set Registry and for the reasons explained by Scott. That trend is changing as clearly illustrated in last nights Mile High auction.<BR><BR><BR>

Archive
11-16-2003, 12:56 AM
Posted By: <b>TBob</b><p>based on personal experience:<BR><BR>1) GAI<BR>2) SGC<BR>3) PSA<BR>4) SCD<BR>5) Everybody else, except<BR>Last) PRO and AAA <BR>The caveat is ASA cards. Some are obviously trimmed (I know, I have bought some of them early on, but many are simply overgraded a grade or two). You can still find deals on cards in ASA holders if you buy the card and not the holder. Ditto the ocassional VGish card in a PRO holder. For some bizarre reason, PRO grades trimmed cards and altered cards and assigns their NMT and MT grades to them and yet also grades VGish cards rather fairly. The problem is you rarely find these floating around. AAA is a joke.

Archive
11-16-2003, 10:36 AM
Posted By: <b>Scarecrow</b><p>Any comments on PGA graded cards? I see a lot of them on E-Bay but don't own any. They seem to be fairly graded from what I could see.

Archive
11-16-2003, 10:40 AM
Posted By: <b>Dan</b><p>isn't that a golf tour?

Archive
11-16-2003, 12:02 PM
Posted By: <b>Hankron</b><p>My concern is not the difference between GAIs and PSAs of the world, but between the have and have not graders ... Say an elderly woman, not familiar with collecting but who had done some research, came to me and said she wanted to buy a lower grade (say Vg) 1933 Goudey Wait Hoyt for her grandson, as Hoyt was her uncle. She was concerned about fakes and wanted to give something nice for her grandson, so she wanted to get one graded by a legitimate grader. Having seen one for sale in a GAI holder, she wanted to know if grader that was okay. "That grader is well known as a legitimate grader" I would say ... If she said PSA, SGC, perhaps one or two others, I would give her the same response ... If she said PRO or AAA I would recommend she not buy the card.<BR><BR>So, my general concerns are with normal, thoughtful beginners who want to get legitimate opinions from third-person companies, in order to get the items they want and to avoid fakes.<BR>

Archive
11-16-2003, 12:19 PM
Posted By: <b>Hankron</b><p>I will also note that a lot of it depends on expectations of the collector. There is a big difference between Mrs. Hoyt trying to get a nice, lower grade Hoyt and someone trying to snag a Gemmest Gem Mint SI for Kids Juan Lebron for investment purposes. For the later, discection of Beckett V PSA is worth the time.

Archive
11-16-2003, 06:26 PM
Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>Thank all of you for the valuable input. This is a big decision these days. G.

Archive
11-17-2003, 06:07 PM
Posted By: <b>Julie</b><p>If you buy a graded card (because that's the only way you can find it), and want to get it out of the holder, GAI is very difficult, but Beckett--you have to take one of those vice grip plyers and break the edges off. Either of which, as far I'm concerned, is better than PSA--what a lot of disappointment they've given me!

Archive
11-18-2003, 02:54 PM
Posted By: <b>Bob Lemke</b><p>not having done much vintage grading (besides the T206 "Florida Find"), check out the auction on Pages 78-79 of this week's (Dec. 5) issue. This is only the tip of the iceberg of vendor-fresh 1960s cards to come.

Archive
11-18-2003, 03:19 PM
Posted By: <b>Jeff</b><p>Where can you pick up the SCD?

Archive
11-19-2003, 11:37 AM
Posted By: <b>Bob Lemke</b><p>Because of its weekly frequency, SCD is virtually a subscriber-only publication. Some card shops handle it. Tell you what . . . the first auction ends Dec. 8. Send me a private e-mail with your mailing address and I'll put a copy of the 12/5 issue in the mail to you. This offer is valid for any non-subscriber.