PDA

View Full Version : Its bacckkkk


EYECOLLECTVINTAGE
02-06-2017, 03:30 PM
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Very-rare-Original-1940s-Babe-Ruth-Bowling-Salesman-Sample-Calendar-Thermometer-/192098149950?hash=item2cb9f1263e:g:xEUAAOSw2xRYTvu V

GET IT WHILE YOU CAN!

RichardSimon
02-06-2017, 04:53 PM
You have to just grimace when you read this in the sellers ad:

"You have certain EBayers that have no idea what their buying so they go on NET54 for opinions. These are the EBayers I really don't need. Or want."

GUYS YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED :D:D. Stay away from this :D:D

slidekellyslide
02-06-2017, 05:24 PM
This seller deserves a negative. I'm hoping Kevin will oblige. :D

khkco4bls
02-06-2017, 06:40 PM
I tried the negative feedback and EBAY removed it on me. THIS GUY IS A REAL PIECE. again his email sfhnuffced@aol.com drop him a note... thx guys

slidekellyslide
02-06-2017, 07:09 PM
I asked him what provenance he has to back up his claim that the calendar company inserted the Ruth photo and not some joe blow who wanted to dramatically increase the value of an ordinary calendar. His reply to me was that the back stamp on the Ruth photo proved it. I googled the name on the back stamp and there is nothing out there except a website with another photo of Ruth with the same stamp.

ruth-gehrig
02-06-2017, 07:55 PM
Everybody go offer him $2 for it. I just did. He'll likely get the point and know it's the "net54 bunch". :D

buymycards
02-06-2017, 07:57 PM
I reported this item to ebay as being a hazardous material.


The item in the listing is identified as a possible danger to health, safety, or property while being transported.

The thermometer contains mercury, which cannot be shipped through the mail.

We will see what happens.

Rick

khkco4bls
02-06-2017, 08:06 PM
It's not Mercury it's an alcohol-based thermometer

khkco4bls
02-06-2017, 08:07 PM
He obviously has a thing for net 54 members also because he's had problems before with members

lrspaulp
02-06-2017, 08:27 PM
I just asked him if it was a fake like the last one he sold with the glued on photo. I hate scam artists that screw with collectors.

Bestdj777
02-06-2017, 08:35 PM
I offered him $1.54 as I need a thermometer.

lrspaulp
02-06-2017, 09:07 PM
I just got into it with him, he spewed something about my gay lover on Net 54 and I offered him 99 cents. I'm still laughing because obviously it pisses him off.

horzverti
02-06-2017, 09:27 PM
I offered him $1.54 as I need a thermometer.

x2

khkco4bls
02-07-2017, 06:03 AM
You know it's great I got my $150 back and then PayPal made a mistake and put a $145.35 credit into my account and they couldn't take it away because they put it in my account so I made $145.35.

khkco4bls
02-07-2017, 08:35 AM
Funny how he doesn't mention the Scotch tape on the back of the photo

Fuddjcal
02-07-2017, 09:30 AM
You know it's great I got my $150 back and then PayPal made a mistake and put a $145.35 credit into my account and they couldn't take it away because they put it in my account so I made $145.35.


F PAY PAL...The 2nd worst company in the world besides scam bay. Nice ending!

rjackson44
02-07-2017, 10:07 AM
this will never end..

Leon
02-07-2017, 10:30 AM
You have to just grimace when you read this in the sellers ad:

"You have certain EBayers that have no idea what their buying so they go on NET54 for opinions. These are the EBayers I really don't need. Or want."

GUYS YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED :D:D. Stay away from this :D:D

It is all Net54's fault .....he hasn't been able to scam someone (yet).

ooo-ribay
02-07-2017, 10:56 AM
It's always good to "out" dishonest sellers......but sometimes you just have to move on.

Leon
02-07-2017, 11:11 AM
It's always good to "out" dishonest sellers......but sometimes you just have to move on.

As long as they are being dishonest I am not moving on :)....

sicollector1954
02-07-2017, 11:28 AM
Does this mean I might get it? I am at $2.01.

khkco4bls
02-07-2017, 01:08 PM
does this mean i might get it? I am at $2.01.sold! Then burn it...

bgar3
02-07-2017, 01:13 PM
As mentioned above there is another online image of Ruth taken by this photographer, which appears original and vintage. It depicts Babe having some sort of make up being applied. I think you would probably be happy to win it at 2.01. Having said that, it does not appear to be original to the calendar.

khkco4bls
02-07-2017, 02:50 PM
I said that before on here that the photo is original to the thirties by that photographer, and I told him that but it does not go with that piece. And then he cursed me up and down