View Full Version : PSA mistake cost seller or did he?
nebboy
09-03-2016, 03:04 PM
This card is flapped as a E90-1 but is really an E106. Bresahan was not a CUB in 1909-11. The bad flap and Corresponding listing problem cost seller some money I'm guessing. I fill I would have to pay a more if sold as a E106.
So question is -
* Did PSA cost the seller.
* Is it seller that should have known his cards better before selling.
* Both got it wrong.
* I should have sent him a message through E-Bay for a heads up at error.
nebboy
09-03-2016, 03:09 PM
back totally different
ullmandds
09-03-2016, 03:23 PM
most e106s are much tougher than e90-1...of course there are exceptions. this is a pathetic...rookie mistake that should never be allowed to happen...never imo. hard to say if this cost seller as more people probably collect e90-1 than e106...and I have no idea what it sold for!
There are a few difficult e90-1s but I don't remember if Bressy is one of them. If he isn't, and I don't think he is but am not sure, and the seller didn't sell it as an E106, he and PSA cost himself money.
pokerplyr80
09-03-2016, 03:57 PM
Did you buy the card? If not I would have sent the seller a heads up so he can get it holdered correctly.
swarmee
09-03-2016, 04:35 PM
Should have been fixed as a mechanical error (free shipping both ways and reholder). But if the card was incorrectly identified in the auction, that's on the seller, too.
Most likely, that's what the original submitter sent it in as, and PSA didn't double-check their id.
Single bidder won the auction for $99 on 20JUL16.
Seller = squeabie
Aquarian Sports Cards
09-03-2016, 05:45 PM
Single bidder won the auction for $99 on 20JUL16.
Seller = squeabie
wow
jhs5120
09-03-2016, 06:09 PM
Am I missing something? An SGC 1.5 sold for $71 a few months ago. I'd $99 a good price for a PSA 1.5?
Aquarian Sports Cards
09-03-2016, 07:05 PM
HOF E106? I'd spend $100 every day of the week.
nebboy
09-04-2016, 08:52 AM
I was the one that bought the card for my pre war CUBS HOF collection. And the great mustache was a bonus. It will probably get sent back to PSA someday for correction.
ullmandds
09-04-2016, 08:57 AM
I was the one that bought the card for my pre war CUBS HOF collection. And the great mustache was a bonus. It will probably get sent back to PSA someday for correction.
But the question is...is bresy the only e106 with a moustache??? You could have a titus-itis on your hands!!!!
Gradedcardman
09-04-2016, 09:26 AM
He cost himself, yes PSA made the mistake but should the owner have no responsibility ? Did he put it on the submission sheet correctly ? Normally PSA corrects that but I guess they are just the only guilty party.
Do I need to be an expert on cards to hire an expert to do their job and do it correctly?
I would say it is a mistake and a bit of incompetence on PSAs part. (It's not the end of the world and they are still a good company)
Sure the seller should know but the mistake is PSA's.....imo. They got paid for their expertise, not the other way around.
He cost himself, yes PSA made the mistake but should the owner have no responsibility ? Did he put it on the submission sheet correctly ? Normally PSA corrects that but I guess they are just the only guilty party.
david_l
09-05-2016, 08:56 AM
I agree with Leon 100%. If you want to label yourself as the industry standard you have to do quality work. For a company that is based solely around their perceived reputation amongst collectors this should never happen. This is their job. They need to do it correctly.