PDA

View Full Version : 1927 Yankees baseball. Opinions, please.


David Atkatz
05-09-2013, 01:50 AM
This baseball has recently been put on display. I have no knowledge of any TPA certification. What do y'all (especially those fans of perfectly formed and uniform signatures) think?

http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j245/datkatz/19273_zps82cc62ce.jpg (http://s82.photobucket.com/user/datkatz/media/19273_zps82cc62ce.jpg.html)

http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j245/datkatz/19272_zps5394dcef.jpg (http://s82.photobucket.com/user/datkatz/media/19272_zps5394dcef.jpg.html)

http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j245/datkatz/19271_zps57a434bf.jpg (http://s82.photobucket.com/user/datkatz/media/19271_zps57a434bf.jpg.html)

yanks12025
05-09-2013, 03:14 AM
No photos are showing up.

David Atkatz
05-09-2013, 09:37 AM
Fixed.

mschwade
05-09-2013, 09:52 AM
Fixed.

Where's the picture of the Pat Collins signature and the Tony Lazzeri? :)

Mr. Zipper
05-09-2013, 10:44 AM
Looks like it could be in the gallery at Yankee Stadium.

You are right... every letter of every signature sure looks carefully and neatly formed. I'll let others opinion if that means fake or not.

packs
05-09-2013, 02:41 PM
I'm glad you mentioned the gallery at Yankee Stadium. Are those balls real? Every single one looked fake to me, even the Don Mattingly.

I should clarify. Fake as in manufactured, not signed by someone else.

Sean1125
05-09-2013, 07:41 PM
It almost looks like a stamped ball to me?? I will wait to see what OP says!

ATP
05-09-2013, 07:47 PM
It isn't stamped, I can see the ink lines from some of the overlaps. Does Lou have an extra letter in his first name???

David Atkatz
05-09-2013, 08:39 PM
No, it certainly isn't stamped.

GoldenAge50s
05-09-2013, 08:56 PM
The whole thing looks bogus & contrived to me.

dapro
05-09-2013, 09:31 PM
This ball looks too clean to me.

MVSNYC
05-09-2013, 09:44 PM
I'm certainly no expert, but i have owned a few Ruth signed checks in the past, so i guess i can comment. the Ruth sig actually looks fine to me, it's the Lou that looks off- maybe club house?

David Atkatz
05-09-2013, 09:47 PM
The only clubhouse Gehrigs known appear on late thirties team balls--almost always 1939--and look nothing like a genuine Gehrig.

kards
05-10-2013, 10:02 PM
Since no one asked yet, what do the markings look like on the ball as you can't see them in any pictures

David Atkatz
05-10-2013, 10:58 PM
What you see is all that is visible on display. I'm sure the markings are fine, though, for a 1927 OAL ball, as you can see a bit of the Ban Johnson signature in the first photo.

kards
05-10-2013, 11:12 PM
I looked at the 1927 Ban Johnson baseball on http://www.bigleaguebaseballs.com/ and the Ban Johnson signature is in a different position then this baseball, on this one the Johnson lines up with the signatures and the others would line against them.

David Atkatz
05-10-2013, 11:21 PM
The Johnson signature was applied by hand with a rubber stamp--it's in a different position on every baseball.

BrandonG
05-11-2013, 01:08 PM
The Johnson signature was applied by hand with a rubber stamp--it's in a different position on every baseball.

Yes, the position means nothing, this ball is cleanly stamped (but with a metal stamp, not rubber). Whomever owned it, or had the team sign it picked a very nice brand new ball, and probably told the guys it was for someone important, so sign it good!

Forever Young
05-11-2013, 01:18 PM
This baseball has recently been put on display. I have no knowledge of any TPA certification. What do y'all (especially those fans of perfectly formed and uniform signatures) think?

http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j245/datkatz/19273_zps82cc62ce.jpg (http://s82.photobucket.com/user/datkatz/media/19273_zps82cc62ce.jpg.html)

http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j245/datkatz/19272_zps5394dcef.jpg (http://s82.photobucket.com/user/datkatz/media/19272_zps5394dcef.jpg.html)

http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j245/datkatz/19271_zps57a434bf.jpg (http://s82.photobucket.com/user/datkatz/media/19271_zps57a434bf.jpg.html)

The Gehrig looks traced over does it not?

David Atkatz
05-11-2013, 02:26 PM
Whomever... had the team sign it... told the guys... sign it good!But did they? That's the question.

BigJJ
05-11-2013, 06:42 PM
D, tough call. I wouldn't buy it, but thats not the question you present. Off hand don't like the single quote marks, the lead into the "e" in Babe and the cross of the "t" in Ruth. I also don't like the long Louuuuu. Odd because some of the flow feels right doesn't it. Tough one. And Ruth did make the "R" error with regularity and the under flow of the "R" though off in location, the flow is on. Do we receive a clear answer? This feels like a test. :cool:

David Atkatz
05-11-2013, 07:03 PM
No test. I have nothing to reveal.
I don't know--not sure myself. Really just want to see how others feel.

David Atkatz
05-13-2013, 03:21 PM
I'm really disappointed that the two guys with the trained "autograph eye" haven't offered their opinions.

Mr. Zipper
05-13-2013, 03:35 PM
Could this be one of those reproduction balls?

Note how the Cedric Durst hits the seam, yet cleanly goes across the hole. You'd think there would be a "catch" in the fountain pen there.

David Atkatz
05-13-2013, 03:50 PM
I don't think so. It seems to be a real OAL ball, while the "reproductions" are totally bogus--including the stampings.

ATP
05-13-2013, 08:39 PM
If you look at the "S" in Shocker, I am almost positive you can see the line of the ink overlap so it wouldn't be stamped. If I HAD to say yes or no, I would probably say yes it looks authentic. Some of the names look a little slow but it could be that they were signing a presentation ball for someone important, etc. I used to have a 1925 Yankees ball with Jacob Rubert and barrow on the sweet spot, all the other guys on the panels and it was arranged quit neatly. I always assumed with Ruppert taking the ss that it must have been a ball for someone special.

David Atkatz
05-15-2013, 05:29 PM
Thanks to all who have offered opinions.

Still waitin' for those "autograph eyes." (Perhaps if the ball was signed in green... )

Runscott
05-16-2013, 10:19 AM
Hi David. You're the self-proclaimed expert on '27 Yankees balls - why would you care what anyone else's opinion was?

And you don't have to keep flagellating yourself over that green-ink team-signed ball. Everyone blows one every now and then...or two...or three.

David Atkatz
05-16-2013, 12:15 PM
Hi David. You're the self-proclaimed expert on '27 Yankees balls - why would you care what anyone else's opinion was?.Just confirms what we all knew. Gutless.

RichardSimon
05-17-2013, 08:47 AM
Hi David. You're the self-proclaimed expert on '27 Yankees balls - why would you care what anyone else's opinion was?

And you don't have to keep flagellating yourself over that green-ink team-signed ball. Everyone blows one every now and then...or two...or three.

:):p;):D:o:rolleyes::cool::eek:
:eek::cool::rolleyes::o:D;):confused::)
You are a funny guy Scott.

David Atkatz
05-17-2013, 01:17 PM
:):p;):D:o:rolleyes::cool::eek:
:eek::cool::rolleyes::o:D;):confused::)
You are a funny guy Scott.I though for sure that someone with your expertise would offer his professional opinion. What a disappointment that all we get are smileys.
(And more of your puerile sh*t-stirring.)

earlywynnfan
05-17-2013, 02:01 PM
I though for sure that someone with your expertise would offer his professional opinion. What a disappointment that all we get are smileys.
(And more of your puerile sh*t-stirring.)

As I read it, I think he was pointing out the sh*t stirring of another.

David Atkatz
05-17-2013, 02:07 PM
There's no sarcasm in Richard's post, Ken.

Runscott
05-17-2013, 02:18 PM
As I read it, I think he was pointing out the sh*t stirring of another.

Sounds like I stirred a lump.

RichardSimon
05-17-2013, 04:16 PM
As I read it, I think he was pointing out the sh*t stirring of another.

I was only pointing out what a humorous guy Scott is, I quoted his post and thought that it would be obvious that I appreciated his humor.

David Atkatz
05-17-2013, 04:43 PM
More useless drivel. Have an opinion, Richard?

Deertick
05-17-2013, 05:08 PM
I was only pointing out what a humorous guy Scott is, I quoted his post and thought that it would be obvious that I appreciated his humor.

Ricjard,
You are trying to explain humor to the most humorless person on the planet. :eek:

Good luck with that! :D:D:D:D

GoldenAge50s
05-17-2013, 05:24 PM
In an attempt to get David's thread back on track I stand by my post 10 that the ball looks "too contrived" & the sigs are bogus. I may be wrong, but I made a stand & will live w/ it. Why can't some of the others do the same thing?

David Atkatz
05-17-2013, 05:36 PM
Thanks very much, Fred.

RichardSimon
05-18-2013, 07:06 AM
Richard,
You are trying to explain humor to the most humorless person on the planet. :eek:

Good luck with that! :D:D:D:D

To dream the impossible dream,,, and spell my name right :D:D

David Atkatz
05-18-2013, 10:10 AM
What a Dick.
Simon.

Shoeless Moe
05-05-2016, 11:33 AM
What ever came of this one? real or not?